E T Liem1, E De Lucia Rolfe, C L'Abée, P J J Sauer, K K Ong, R P Stolk. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Room X4.301, PO Box 30.001, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands. e.t.liem@bkk.umcg.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Both intra-abdominal adipose tissue (IAAT) and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SAAT) are associated with cardiovascular risk factors, even in childhood. Currently, the gold standard in assessing IAAT and SAAT is computed tomography (CT), which is not widely applicable. The aim of this study was to estimate abdominal fat using anthropometry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and ultrasound, and compare these estimates with the amounts of IAAT and SAAT determined by CT in 6 to 7-year-old children. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: In 31 healthy children, weight, height, circumferences, skinfolds, DEXA, abdominal ultrasound and CT were performed. Measurements were compared by simple correlations and receiver operating characteristic analyses. RESULTS: Total abdominal fat on CT did not differ between boys and girls (86.5 versus 89.8 cm(3), P=0.84). Boys had a higher IAAT to SAAT ratio than girls (0.56 versus 0.37, P=0.03). The sum of supra-iliac and abdominal skinfolds was most strongly correlated with SAAT on CT (r=0.93, P<0.001), and the abdominal skinfold with IAAT on CT (r=0.72, P<0.001). Diagnosis of subcutaneous abdominal and intra-abdominal adiposity can also be made using skinfolds. The associations with circumferences, body mass index and DEXA were less pronounced; however, these techniques can also be used to classify children according to SAAT and IAAT. Ultrasound can be used to diagnose subcutaneous adiposity, although it was not superior to skinfold measurements. CONCLUSION: Skinfold measurements are the best non-invasive technique in predicting subcutaneous as well as intra-abdominal fat in our population of 6 to 7-year-old children.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Both intra-abdominal adipose tissue (IAAT) and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SAAT) are associated with cardiovascular risk factors, even in childhood. Currently, the gold standard in assessing IAAT and SAAT is computed tomography (CT), which is not widely applicable. The aim of this study was to estimate abdominal fat using anthropometry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and ultrasound, and compare these estimates with the amounts of IAAT and SAAT determined by CT in 6 to 7-year-old children. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: In 31 healthy children, weight, height, circumferences, skinfolds, DEXA, abdominal ultrasound and CT were performed. Measurements were compared by simple correlations and receiver operating characteristic analyses. RESULTS: Total abdominal fat on CT did not differ between boys and girls (86.5 versus 89.8 cm(3), P=0.84). Boys had a higher IAAT to SAAT ratio than girls (0.56 versus 0.37, P=0.03). The sum of supra-iliac and abdominal skinfolds was most strongly correlated with SAAT on CT (r=0.93, P<0.001), and the abdominal skinfold with IAAT on CT (r=0.72, P<0.001). Diagnosis of subcutaneous abdominal and intra-abdominal adiposity can also be made using skinfolds. The associations with circumferences, body mass index and DEXA were less pronounced; however, these techniques can also be used to classify children according to SAAT and IAAT. Ultrasound can be used to diagnose subcutaneous adiposity, although it was not superior to skinfold measurements. CONCLUSION: Skinfold measurements are the best non-invasive technique in predicting subcutaneous as well as intra-abdominal fat in our population of 6 to 7-year-old children.
Authors: Christina Brei; Daniela Much; Ellen Heimberg; Verena Schulte; Stefanie Brunner; Lynne Stecher; Christiane Vollhardt; Jan S Bauer; Ulrike Amann-Gassner; Hans Hauner Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Noel T Mueller; Mark A Pereira; Adriana Buitrago-Lopez; Diana C Rodríguez; Alvaro E Duran; Alvaro J Ruiz; Christian F Rueda-Clausen; Cristina Villa-Roel Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Kirsten S de Fluiter; Inge A L P van Beijsterveldt; Laura M Breij; Dennis Acton; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Laura M Breij; Marieke Abrahamse-Berkeveld; Dennis Acton; Emanuella De Lucia Rolfe; Ken K Ong; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega Journal: Ann Nutr Metab Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 3.374
Authors: Emanuella De Lucia Rolfe; Neena Modi; Sabita Uthaya; Ieuan A Hughes; David B Dunger; Carlo Acerini; Ronald P Stolk; Ken K Ong Journal: J Obes Date: 2013-04-17