Literature DB >> 19126132

Sensitivity and responsiveness of the Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale to the presence and treatment of adult laryngotracheal stenosis.

S A R Nouraei1, S M Nouraei, P S Randhawa, C R Butler, J C Magill, D J Howard, G S Sandhu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the sensitivity and responsiveness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, a psychophysical dyspnoea assessment instrument to the presence and treatment of adult laryngotracheal stenosis.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTINGS: Tertiary/National referral airway reconstruction centre. PARTICIPANTS: Fourty tracheostomy-free patients undergoing endoscopic airway examination/laryngotracheoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and clinical information, obtained from patient records, lesion severity, which was recorded intraoperatively, standard spirometry, which was measured preoperatively, and the MRC dyspnoea scale, which was administered preoperatively and at the first outpatient visit 4-6 weeks later.
RESULTS: There were 16 males and 24 females. Mean age at presentation was 44 +/- 14 years (+/- SD). Postintubation stenosis was the commonest aetiology (73%) followed by idiopathic subglottic stenosis and Wegener's Granulomatosis. Six patients were examined post-treatment and had minimal residual stenosis and the remaining patients had glottic stenosis (n = 11) or Myer-Cotton Grade I (n = 8), II (n = 7) or III (n = 8) tracheal stenoses. Pre-treatment MRC dyspnoea scores and the degree of change in the MRC score following treatment strongly correlated with pre-treatment stenosis severity (r = 0.75 and r = -0.71 respectively; P < .001). Moreover statistically significant correlations existed between preoperative peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in 1 s and preoperative MRC dyspnoea scores (r = -0.34 and r = -0.35 respectively; P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Exertional dyspnoea is the hallmark symptom of laryngotracheal stenosis and for many patients it is the primary cause of disability. These findings confirm that the MRC dyspnoea scale is an appropriate outcome instrument for assessing dyspnoea associated with this condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19126132     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01832.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  5 in total

Review 1.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Upper Airway-Related Dyspnea: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Meaghan Noud; Kristen Hovis; Alexander Gelbard; Nila A Sathe; David F Penson; Irene D Feurer; Melissa L McPheeters; David O Francis
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Assessment of peak inspiratory flow in the management of acute inspiratory dyspnoea.

Authors:  Emeline Drapier; Esteban Brenet; Marie-Anne Louges; Jean-Claude Merol; Marc Labrousse; Xavier Dubernard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Dyspnea Index: An upper airway obstruction instrument; translation and validation in Swedish.

Authors:  Eleftherios Ntouniadakis; Ole Brus; Mathias von Beckerath
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.597

4.  Serum interleukin 1β in patients with acquired laryngotracheal stenosis.

Authors:  Norazwani Azwal; Yogeswaran Lokanathan; Mawaddah Azman; Min Hwei Ng; Abdullah Sani Mohamed; Marina Mat Baki
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.618

5.  Contribution of flow-volume curves to the detection of central airway obstruction.

Authors:  Liliana Bárbara Perestrelo de Andrade e Raposo; António Bugalho; Maria João Marques Gomes
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2013 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 2.624

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.