Literature DB >> 19125796

A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.

J Kondra1, S R Y Ong, J Clifton, K Evans, R J Finley, J Yee.   

Abstract

Cervical esophagogastric anastomoses are commonly used for reconstruction after esophagectomy because of the lower mortality rate associated with an anastomotic leak compared to intrathoracic anastomoses. However, cervical esophagogastric anastomoses have been criticized for their higher leak rates, stricture formation and greater need for later dilatations when compared with intrathoracic anastomoses. Multiple studies have looked at varying techniques to improve the outcome of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. This study was performed to determine whether a partially stapled (posterior stapled wall and anterior hand-sewn wall) anastomosis reliably reduced leaks and the need for later dilatation. From January 2001 to March 2006, 168 patients who underwent cervical esophagogastric anastomosis following esophagectomy (transhiatal or three-hole) for cancer were identified. Beginning in September 2003, the partially stapled technique was introduced and used in 79 patients. Clinical outcomes were compared to patients in whom hand-sewn technique was used (n = 89). Outcomes related to anastomotic leak, other hospital complications, length of stay, postoperative dilatations and survival were compared using Student's t-tests and chi-square tests (P < 0.05), as well as multiple regression analyses. An anastomotic leak occurred in 10 (12.7%) patients who received a partially stapled anastomosis. A hand-sewn anastomosis was complicated by an anastomotic leak in 24 patients (27.0%). This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.021). This lowered incidence of leak was associated with an earlier initiation of oral feeds (median 7 vs. 9.5 days, P < 0.001) and a reduction in hospital stay (median 10 vs. 15 days, P < 0.001). Furthermore, dysphagia associated with stricture requiring postoperative dilatations was markedly diminished in the stapled anastomosis [23 (31.3%) vs. 49 (55.1%), P = 0.001]. The partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leaks and the need for postoperative dilatation to treat strictures compared to the hand-sewn anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19125796     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00792.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  17 in total

1.  Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck.

Authors:  Sundeep Singh Saluja; Sukanta Ray; Sujoy Pal; Sumit Sanyal; Nikhil Agrawal; Nihar Ranjan Dash; Peush Sahni; Tushar Kanti Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Extending the reach of stapled anastomosis with a prepared OrVil™ device in laparoscopic oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Abdelmonim E A Salih; Gary A Bass; Yvonne D'Cruz; Robert P Brennan; Sebastian Smolarek; Mayilone Arumugasamy; Thomas N Walsh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Fady Yanni; Pritam Singh; Nilanjana Tewari; Simon L Parsons; James A Catton; John Duffy; Neil T Welch; Ravinder S Vohra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Planned delay of oral intake after esophagectomy reduces the cervical anastomotic leak rate and hospital length of stay.

Authors:  John S Bolton; William C Conway; Abbas E Abbas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu-Feng Deng; Quan-Xing Liu; Dong Zhou; Jia-Xin Min; Ji-Gang Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Is hand sewing comparable with stapling for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Quan-Xing Liu; Jia-Xin Min; Xu-Feng Deng; Ji-Gang Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.

Authors:  Qi-Rong Xu; Kang-Ning Wang; Wen-Ping Wang; Kun Zhang; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Takahiro Hosoi; Tetsuya Abe; Norihisa Uemura; Eiji Higaki; Ryosuke Kawai; Jiro Kawakami; Byonggu An; Masato Nagino; Yasuhiro Shimizu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Author's Reply: Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Fady Yanni
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Benefits versus risks: a prospective audit. Feeding jejunostomy during esophagectomy.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.