Literature DB >> 19125279

A comparison of different two-dimensional approaches for the determination of the patellar tendon moment arm length.

Dimitrios E Tsaopoulos1, Vasilios Baltzopoulos, Paula J Richards, Constantinos N Maganaris.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to estimate and compare the moment arm length of the patellar tendon (d) during passive knee extension using three different reference landmarks; instant centre of rotation (ICR), tibiofemoral contact point (TFCP) and geometrical centre of the posterior femoral condyles (GCFC). Measurements were taken on the right leg on seven healthy males during passive knee rotation performed by the motor of a Cybex Norm isokinetic dynamometer. Moment arms lengths were obtained by analysing lateral X-ray images recorded using a GE FlexiView 8800 C-arm videofluoroscopy system. The d-knee joint angle relations with respect to GCFC and ICR were similar, with decreasing values from full knee extension (~5.8 cm for d (GCFC) and ~5.9 cm for d (ICR)) to 90 degrees of knee flexion (~4.8 cm for both d (GCFC) and d (ICR)). However, the d (TFCP)-knee joint angle relation had an ascending-descending shape, with the highest d (TFCP) value (~5 cm) at 60 degrees of knee flexion. There was no significant difference between the GCFC and ICR methods at any knee joint angle. In contrast, there were significant differences (P < 0.01) between d (ICR) and d (TFCP) at 0 degrees , 15 degrees , 30 degrees and 45 degrees of knee flexion and between d (GCFC) and d (TFCP) at 0 degrees , 15 degrees and 30 degrees of knee flexion (P < 0.01). This study shows that when using different knee joint rotation centre definitions, there are significant differences in the estimates of the patellar tendon moment arm length, especially in more extended knee joint positions. These differences can have serious implications for joint modelling and loading applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19125279     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-008-0968-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  32 in total

1.  A kinematic study of lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  B J Robinson; J L Rees; A J Price; D J Beard; D M Murray
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes.

Authors:  E Most; J Axe; H Rubash; G Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  On calculating the finite centre of rotation for rigid planar motion.

Authors:  Brendan McCane; J Haxby Abbott; Tamara King
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 4.  The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint.

Authors:  M A R Freeman; V Pinskerova
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Muscle balance at the knee--moment arms for the normal knee and the ACL-minus knee.

Authors:  W L Buford; F M Ivey; J D Malone; R M Patterson; G L Peare; D K Nguyen; A A Stewart
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  1997-12

6.  A rigid-body method for finding centers of rotation and angular displacements of planar joint motion.

Authors:  J J Spiegelman; S L Woo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Centers and angles of rotation of body joints: a study of errors and optimization.

Authors:  M M Panjabi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  A planar model of the knee joint to characterize the knee extensor mechanism.

Authors:  G T Yamaguchi; F E Zajac
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Errors in kinematic parameters of a planar joint: guidelines for optimal experimental design.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; V K Goel; S D Walter
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Joint forces in extension of the knee. Analysis of a mechanical model.

Authors:  R Nisell; G Németh; H Ohlsén
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1986-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Moment arms of the knee extensor mechanism in children and adults.

Authors:  Thomas D O'Brien; Neil D Reeves; Vasilios Baltzopoulos; David A Jones; Constantinos N Maganaris
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Anatomical and neuromuscular variables strongly predict maximum knee extension torque in healthy men.

Authors:  J Trezise; N Collier; A J Blazevich
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Anatomical and Neuromuscular Determinants of Strength Change in Previously Untrained Men Following Heavy Strength Training.

Authors:  J Trezise; A J Blazevich
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.