Literature DB >> 19125053

Replacement of 137Cs irradiators with x-ray irradiators.

Brian Dodd1, Richard J Vetter.   

Abstract

Self-shielded 137Cs irradiators have been used for many years to irradiate blood products to prevent graft vs. host disease and to irradiate cells and small animals in research. A report by the National Academy of Sciences recommends that careful consideration be given to replacement of 137Cs irradiators with x-ray irradiators. Several manufacturers and users of x-ray irradiators were contacted to determine costs of replacing and maintaining 137Cs irradiators with x-ray units and to assess users' experience with x-ray irradiators. Purchase costs of x-ray units are similar to 137Cs irradiators, but maintenance costs are significantly higher if annual service contracts are used. Performance of the two irradiator types appears to be equivalent, but in some cases x-ray irradiations may need to be performed in multiple configurations to achieve adequate uniformity in dose. No literature reports were found that evaluated the biological effectiveness of x rays vs. 137Cs gamma rays; therefore, a careful study should be conducted to determine the biological effectiveness of x rays vs. 137Cs gamma rays for biological responses relevant to transfusion medicine and immunological research. Throughput may be problematic for large transfusion medicine programs, and back-up plans may be necessary in case the x-ray unit needs to be taken out of service for extended maintenance. Disposition of a 137Cs irradiator will add to the cost of replacement with an x-ray unit, but disposal may be possible through the U.S. Department of Energy's Off-Site Source Recovery Program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19125053     DOI: 10.1097/01.HP.0000334555.78657.bc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of Cesium-137 and X-ray Irradiators by Using Bone Marrow Transplant Reconstitution in C57BL/6J Mice.

Authors:  Brian W Gibson; Nathan C Boles; George P Souroullas; Alan J Herron; Joe K Fraley; Rebecca S Schwiebert; John J Sharp; Margaret A Goodell
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  Modeling Cell Survival Fraction and Other Dose-Response Relationships for Immunodeficient C.B-17 SCID Mice Exposed to 320-kV X Rays.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Yong Lin; Bryanna Saxton; Wenshu Chen; Charles A Potter; Steven A Belinsky
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of packed red blood cell irradiation by a linear accelerator.

Authors:  Ricardo Aparecido Olivo; Marcus Vinícius da Silva; Fernanda Bernadelli Garcia; Sheila Soares; Virmondes Rodrigues Junior; Helio Moraes-Souza
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2015-04-23

4.  Biological characterization of a novel in vitro cell irradiator.

Authors:  Tyler L Fowler; Michael M Fisher; Alison M Bailey; Bryan P Bednarz; Randall J Kimple
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of X-ray irradiation on hepatocarcinoma cells and erythrocytes in salvaged blood.

Authors:  Feng-Jiang Zhang; Jin-Ting Yang; Li-Hui Tang; Wen-Na Wang; Kai Sun; Yue Ming; Kanhar Ghulam Muhammad; Yin-Fei Zheng; Min Yan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of gamma and x-ray irradiation for myeloablation and establishment of normal and autoimmune syngeneic bone marrow chimeras.

Authors:  Thomas Rea Wittenborn; Cecilia Fahlquist Hagert; Alexey Ferapontov; Sofie Fonager; Lisbeth Jensen; Gudrun Winther; Søren Egedal Degn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.