US homeland security concerns related to potential misuse of γ-ray-emitting radiation sources employed in radiobiological research (eg, shielded cesium-137 irradiators) led to recommendations by the National Research Council to conduct studies into possibly replacing γ-ray irradiators used in research involving small rodent and other models with X-ray instruments. A limiting factor is suitability of the X-ray photon energy spectra. The objective of our research was to demonstrate the suitability of the radiation energy spectrum of 320-kV X rays after filtration (HVL = 4 mm Cu) for in-vivo cytotoxicity studies in immunodeficient C.B-17 SCID mice. By using a previously-published Hazard Function (HF) model to characterize dose-response relationships for in vivo bone marrow and spleen cell survival fractions and also to characterize the acute lethality risk (hematopoietic syndrome mode) we demonstrate that the filtered 320-kV X-ray beam appears suitable for such studies. A key finding for C.B-17 SCID mice when compared to results previously obtained for immunocompetent C.B-17 mice is that the immunodeficient mice appear to be more radioresistant, implicating a possible role of the immune system capacity in radiosensitivity of mammals.
US homeland security concerns related to potential misuse of γ-ray-emitting radiation sources employed in radiobiological research (eg, shielded cesium-137 irradiators) led to recommendations by the National Research Council to conduct studies into possibly replacing γ-ray irradiators used in research involving small rodent and other models with X-ray instruments. A limiting factor is suitability of the X-ray photon energy spectra. The objective of our research was to demonstrate the suitability of the radiation energy spectrum of 320-kV X rays after filtration (HVL = 4 mm Cu) for in-vivo cytotoxicity studies in immunodeficient C.B-17 SCID mice. By using a previously-published Hazard Function (HF) model to characterize dose-response relationships for in vivo bone marrow and spleen cell survival fractions and also to characterize the acute lethality risk (hematopoietic syndrome mode) we demonstrate that the filtered 320-kV X-ray beam appears suitable for such studies. A key finding for C.B-17 SCID mice when compared to results previously obtained for immunocompetent C.B-17 mice is that the immunodeficientmice appear to be more radioresistant, implicating a possible role of the immune system capacity in radiosensitivity of mammals.
The world we live in today is challenged by the threat of radiological terrorism.
This includes the possible use by terrorists of a radioactivity dispersal device
containing radioactive materials such as cesium-137 (137Cs), a γ-emitting
radionuclide. While the use of such a device is likely not life-threatening, it
could possibly lead to large costs associated with population evacuation,
relocation, and area decontamination. There is an ongoing effort to replace
137Cs irradiators used in radiobiological studies with X-ray
irradiators with suitable energy spectra. One attractive X-ray irradiator is the
X-RAD 320.For each type of radiobiological study (eg, in vitro, in vivo) of interest that would
be conducted using 137Cs γ rays, it is important to consider an
alternative X-ray source with a suitable photon energy spectrum.
Self-shielded 137Cs-chloride irradiators with radioactivity at the
International Atomic Energy Agency Category 1 and 2 levels (ie, greater than 27 Ci)
are mainly used in 3 major applications
: (1) biomedical research involving live cells in culture and small mammals
(eg, mice, rats), (2) blood sterilization, and (3) calibration. Cesium-137 chloride
was selected for the irradiators because of the radiation photon energy spectra in
the different radiation exposure chambers. The radioisotope has a single initial
photon energy (0.662 MeV), very long half-life, low cost (relatively), and moderate
shielding requirements. After the emitted photons penetrate the irradiator housing
materials there is a complex spectrum of photon energy.A report by the National Research Council
recommended that careful consideration be given to the possibility of
replacing 137Cs irradiators with suitable X-ray irradiators with respect
to characteristics of the filtered (which removes low-energy, X-ray photons that
produce higher local radiation doses than high-energy photons) photon energy
spectrum.Our previous research
that relates to the findings discussed here focused on comparing the relative
biological effectiveness (RBE) of filtered 320-kV X rays (HVL = 4 mm Cu) as compared
to shielded 137Cs γ rays for 2 in vivo endpoints in
immunocompetent C.B-17 male and female mice after split-dose,
whole-body-bilateral exposure: (1) in vivo cytotoxicity to bone marrow and spleen
cells evaluated at 1 day post exposure and (2) bone marrow and spleen reconstitution
deficits (repopulation shortfalls) evaluated at 6 weeks after radiation exposure. We
found that the cell survival fraction (and related cell lethality hazard)
dose-response relationships for bone marrow and spleen cells are complex, involving
negative curvature (decreasing slope magnitude on semi-log plot of survival fraction
as dose increases). The negative curvature can be explained on the basis of a known
mixed cell population comprised of hyper-radiosensitive, moderately radiosensitive,
and radioresistant cells. The hyper-radiosensitive cells appeared to respond with
50% being killed by an absorbed dose <0.5 Gy.The X-ray RBE, relative to γ rays, for a loss of bone marrow cells in vivo was found
to be > 1, while for a loss of splenocytes it was unexpectedly <1 (explainable
based on absorbed doses to spleen being possibly underestimated). Dosimetric
research has revealed that absorbed dose underestimation for internal organs of
X-ray-exposed mice can be an issue.In contrast to early occurring effects of irradiation, dose-response relationships
for reconstitution deficits (ie, shortfall on full recovery) in the bone marrow and
spleen of immunocompetent C.B-17 mice at 6 weeks post irradiation were of the
threshold type with γ rays apparently being more effective in causing reconstitution deficit.
This may relate to radiation doses to spleen being in error and/or to RBE
being different for reconstitution deficit than for early (after 24 hours)
cytotoxicity response.The observed differences between 320-kV X rays and Cs-137 γ rays for mouse bone
marrow and spleen cells may also relate in part to microdosimetric differences for
bone marrow cells and spleen cells,
which cannot be resolved using macroscopic absorbed dose.
Bone marrow cells near bone receive higher local radiation doses (from
photoelectrons) than is the case for 137Cs γ rays.
In addition, at the level of individual cells and for subcellular targets
(eg, nucleus), the microdose distribution is inferred to be different for shielded
137Cs γ rays and filtered 320-kV X rays (based on in vitro studies
data and biological microdosimetry for other cell types).
This is consistent with physical microdosimetric principles.
Research Aim
Research results reported here relate to determining whether the energy spectrum of
filtered photons of the X-RAD 320 irradiator
is suitable for simultaneously depleting live cells in bone marrow and spleen
of irradiated male and female C.B-17 SCID mice to levels (associated with highest
dose of 7 Gy used) expected to be suitable for bone marrow transplantation
studies. Judgements about successful depletion are based on cell
survival levels observed after successful bone marrow engraftment following
137Cs gamma-ray exposure. Bone marrow transplantation was not
performed in the new study discussed. The immunodeficientmice were used because
immunocompetent C.B-17 mice (as previously used) are no longer available. We assumed
that bone marrow and spleen cell radiosensitivity is not influenced by the immune
system or gender.A key finding of our dose-response modeling research using the immunodeficientmice
is that they appear to be more radioresistant than the immunocompetent mice,
implicating a possible role of the immune system in radiosensitivity in
vivo.
Materials and Methods
Mouse Strain
Equal numbers of male and female C.B-17 SCID mice were purchased from Taconic and
used in this research. The animals were placed in standard rodent housing and
provided water containing Baytril (enrofloxacin, 175 mg/L) antibiotic for 1 week
prior to irradiation.
Irradiator
The X-RAD 320 Unit
from Precision X-Ray, Inc. (Nort Brandford, CT) in conjunction with a GE
ISOVOLT 320 TITAN X-ray Unit is a self-contained X-ray-photon source designed
for biological and medical research. A cathode generator with a power
electronics module and anode generator are used to generate the negative and
positive high voltages to excite the X-ray tube. X-ray exposures employed a
filter comprised of 0.75-mm tin + 0.25-mm copper + 1.5-mm aluminum (HVL = 4-mm Cu).
The PTW UNIDOSE E dosimeter and related Farmer chamber recommended by
Precision X-Ray were used for accurate dose measurements rather than relying on
the setting of the X-RAD 320 device. Radiation exposure was
unilateral-single-dose at a source to surface distance of 50 cm. A fixed dose
rate of 1 Gy/min was used. The X-RAD 320 irradiator is housed in a secure area
only accessible to approved qualified individuals.
Exposure of Mice
Mice 6-8 weeks old at the start of irradiations were placed in a pie-cage on a
rotating specimen turntable designed for X-RAD devices and whole-body exposed to
0.1, 1, 3, 4.5, or 7 Gy of filtered 320-kV X rays. Age-matched, non-irradiated
control mice were placed in the pie-cage and mock-irradiated for the same period
of time as for the highest dose (7 Gy) group. After irradiation, mice were
housed in autoclaved cage setups and provided antibiotic-containing drinking
water and irradiated food. The protocol for animal experiments was approved by
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC) of Lovelace Biomedical
Research Institute.
Surviving Cells Assessment for Bone Marrow and Spleen
On Day 1 after radiation exposure, bone marrow and spleen were prepared from the
irradiated and control mice. Six irradiated mice/dose group (n = 30 mice total
for irradiated mice, with half males and half females) were euthanized 24 hours
after irradiation and the extent of bone marrow and splenocyte cellularity was
assessed. The control mice (n = 6, with half males and half females) were also
euthanized 24 hours after mock irradiation and assessed for
spleen and bone marrow cellularity. Spleen and bone marrow from each of the
euthanized mice were harvested, evaluated to determine live cell counts
per unit body weight (an adjustment for different body sizes to
that of a 25 g mouse irrespective of gender).
Evaluating Mortality via the Hematopoietic Syndrome Mode
Mortality via the hematopoietic syndrome mode was assessed based on 30-day
lethality among 60 mice (10 for each of 6 exposure groups with equal numbers of
males and females) assigned to a 6 weeks follow-up group. Thirty-day lethality
has historically been used in mouse studies when assessing expected deaths
caused by damage to the hematopoietic system by brief, high-dose-rate,
total-body exposure to ionizing radiation.
The median lethal dose for 30-day lethality (i.e., LD50/30) is
monitored in mouse models for radiation countermeasures research related to the
hematopoietic mode of death.
Bone Marrow Isolation and Spleen Cell Preparation
The femur was removed from a euthanized mouse and cleaned of soft tissues and
muscles. The bones were then cut at both ends and the marrow flushed into 15 ml
tubes with RPMI 1640 medium containing 5% FBS. The bone marrow was collected by
centrifugation at 500 × g for 10 minutes and re-suspended in 1 ml of ACK lysis
buffer (Gibco, A10492-01) at room temperature for 3 minutes to lyse the red
blood cells. The debris were removed by addition of 10 ml of PBS and
centrifugation at 500 × g for 10 minutes, and the bone marrow cells were
resuspended in 3 ml of medium. Single cell suspension of the spleen was prepared
by pressing mouse spleen against a 70 µM size cell strainer. After red blood
cells were lysed using ACK lysis buffer, the spleen cells were resuspended in 3
ml RPMI 1640 medium. The tissues and cells were placed on ice where applicable
during the preparation.
Cell Counting
Cells were stained with Trypan Blue and counted using Countess II automated cell
counter (Life Technologies) with default settings, which provided cell counts of
dead, live, and total number of cells per ml. The data were used to calculate
total counts of bone marrow cells from femurs isolated from mice resuspended in
the same amount of medium as described above.
Dose-Response-Modeling Approach
A Hazard Function (HF) model
(mathematical construct is specific for high dose rates)
was used for evaluating in vivo cell survival fractions. The model has the
very useful features that not only can it be applied to cell survival modeling,
but also to acute lethality modeling as well.
For combined exposures to different radiation types or for combining results
for different radiation sources (e.g., 137Cs gamma ray and 320-kV X
rays), a more complicated form of the HF model can also be employed using
RBE-weighted dose and dose rate.
Changing dose rates from internal radionuclides can also be addressed with
the more complicated form.In the current research we use HF models (specific for high dose-rate exposures) for
both cell survival fraction and acute lethality via the hematopoietic mode for 320
kV X-ray-exposed C.B-17 SCID mice. Different model-parameter and
dose-response-function indicators are used in distinguishing these 2
endpoints. We first present the general HF model with related basic parameters and
then introduce new parameter and dose-response function indicators to differentiate
between cell killing and acute lethality via the hematopoietic mode as
endpoints.With the HF model and radiation absorbed dose D for the target tissue of interest,
the survival probability S(D) (for cells or individuals), associated risk R(D), and
hazard function H(D) are related through the following equation:Values of both S(D) and R(D) are limited to the range 0 to 1, while H(D) can take on
values from 0 to very large numbers.The hazard function H(D) as previously modeled and as used here has but 2 parameters:
shape parameter v and median effective dose D50 which is the radiation
dose for a risk of 0.5 (or 50% being affected). For cell killing D50 is
the dose associated with loss of 50% of the cells. For acute lethality of mice
related to the hematopoietic syndrome, D50 corresponds to the
LD50 dose for 50% mortality of irradiated individuals. For mice, the
hematopoietic syndrome mortality has been estimated based on lives lost within 30
days after brief, single-dose exposure at a high dose rate, so LD50/30
evaluations are used for estimating LD50.The function H(D) is given by the following equation:When D = D50, H = ln(2) = 0.6931. Based on Equation 2, the dose
Dx for x% of the cells being killed (when modeling cell survival) or
for x% of the irradiated population of animals not surviving (when modeling acute
lethality) is given by the following, where Hx is the value of the hazard
function H(D) for the effect level of interest:Because Equation 2 applies to different endpoints (cell killing [ck] or
acute lethality [al]) in this paper, to distinguish these endpoints
we substitute vck for v for cell-killing modeling and also substitute
D50ck for D50. Corresponding substitutions for acute
lethality [ac] of animals are val and LD50 (estimated
based on LD50/30 for mice).
The parameter LD50 is formally the historical median
lethal dose. The mode of acute lethality focused on here, that is the
hematopoietic mode, is linked to bone marrow damage.A benefit of being able to use the HF Model for characterizing dose-response
relationships for S(D), R(D), and H(D) for cytotoxicity is that this allows for
generating expected cell survival curves for subpopulations of
cells with differing radiosensitivity distributions. For example, a
cell survival curve can be generated for the subpopulation of cells expected to be
eliminated by doses up to but not exceeding the LD50. This allows for
comparing expected cell survival curves for radiation doses up to acute lethality
dose percentiles, eg, LD01 (dose expected to eliminate 1% of animals),
LD20, LD50, LD90, and LD99 (dose
expected to eliminate 99% of animals). These curves can also be compared to the
modeled cell survival curve for the total cell population.
Characterizing Cell Survival Fraction and Related Dose-Response
Relationships
The predicted average cell survival fraction, dose-response for the subpopulation
of cells (highly radio-sensitive and moderately radiosensitive) eliminated by
absorbed radiation doses up to the LD50 is given by the following
equation (for D in the range 0 to LD50 but not any higher doses):Again, the subscript ck is used to specify the cell killing
endpoint, rather than the acute lethality (al) endpoint. Also,
LD50 relates to acute lethality of animals here and not to cell
loss specifically, as previously indicated. For any other acute lethality dose
percentile LDx (for x % of the irradiation population of animals
eliminated), the more general cell survival faction equation Sx(D ≤
LDx) is given by the following equation:Equation 5 only applies to radiation doses up to the acute lethality dose
percentile LDx. Previously, vck has been assumed to have the same
value for both X rays and γ rays but may differ for different tissue.For D = 0 Gy, Sxck(D ≤ LDx) = 1, so Sxck(D ≤
LDx) takes on the value [1 − Sck(LDx)]/[1 −
Sck(LDx)] which equals 1. For D = LDx, all
of the cells in the subpopulation considered are expected to be
eliminated and this is reflected by the numerator of Equation 5 then
being [Sck(LDx) − Sck(LDx)], which
is of course 0 at the indicated dose LDx.Values for LDx and related uncertainty can be obtained when using
Bayesian inference in applying the HF model to data for acute lethality. We have
focused on the 3 specific values LD1, LD50, and
LD99 for some comparisons and on LD01,
LD20, LD50, LD90, and LD99 for other
comparisons. Of the different dose percentiles, only LD50 is a HF
model parameter (for lethality of animals) that is evaluated (along with related
uncertainty) via our current Bayesian analyzes program. However, the other acute
lethality dose percentiles can be (and are) calculated (central estimates) based
on Bayesian-analysis posterior means for HF model parameters.For X-ray cytotoxicity in vivo, Rck(D) corresponds to the ablation
function A(D), as used in Gott et al
for immunocompetent C.B-17 mice. For characterizing the average
live cell counts C(D) in bone marrow (or spleen) per unit body
weight 1 day after radiation exposure as a function of absorbed dose D, an
additional parameter C0 can be used to represent the average live
cell count per unit body weight among un-irradiated control replicates. The
expected average live cell count per unit body weight after dose D is given by
C(D) = C0Sck(D). The expected average survival fraction
for live cells after animal exposure to dose D is derived from data for C(D)
based on the following relationship:Thus, experimental data for C(D) and C0 can be used to generate data
for Sck(D), which is the approach that has been used in this paper.
This is how the data in Figure
1 for bone marrow cells and in Figure 2 for spleen cells are related to
the corresponding cell survival fraction data (averages) in Figures 3 and 4. Because mice in our study were of
differing body weights, results obtained for cell counts per gram body weight,
were adjusted to cell counts for a reference 25 g mouse. Thus, results in Figures 1 and 2 relate to 25 g mice.
The adjustment has no impact on Sck(D) as evaluated.
Figure 1.
Live bone marrow cell counts (×105) 1 day after 320-kV X-ray
exposures of C.B-17 SCID mice. Cell counts were adjusted to a body
weight of 25 g (reference mouse) using data for cell count per unit body
weight. Each data point represents an individual animal. The dose scale
is linear so the 0.1 Gy group is near the 0-dose group (controls). As
illustrated, there is large variability in the data. The live cell count
data are negatively correlated with radiation dose [r = −0.466; t =
−3.02, p (non-directional) = 0.00482, www.vassarstats.net]; thus there is a significant
radiation dose dependence. The data are suggestive of a negative
curvature dose-response relationship where the magnitude of the slope on
a semi logarithm plot decreases with increasing dose. One outlier
(lowest data point for controls) was excluded in modeling of the
data.
Figure 2.
Live spleen cell counts (×105) 1 day after 320-kV X-ray
unilateral-single-dose exposures of C.B-17 SCID mice. Cell counts were
adjusted to a body weight of 25 g using data for cell count per unit
body weight. Each data point represents an individual animal. The dose
scale is linear so the 0.1 Gy group is near the 0-dose group (controls).
As illustrated, there is some variability in the data and there is a
clear dose association. Compared to bone marrow, a smaller number of
data points were available at the time of the modeling of the data. A
sufficient number of data points were however available for reliable
modeling as the model used for characterizing in vivo cell survival
fractions has but 2 parameters. One outlier (lowest data point for
controls) was excluded in modeling of the data.
Figure 3.
Fitted dose-response curve for the bone marrow cell survival fraction
(average) for 320-kV X-ray exposed C.B-17 SCID mice, based on average
bone marrow survival fraction data in Table 1 and HF model
parameters (means) in Table 2. Error bars for the
presented data points are ±1 standard error.
Figure 4.
Fitted dose-response curve for spleen cell survival fraction (average)
based on average spleen survival fraction data in Table 3 and HF model
parameters (means) in Table 4. Error bars for the
presented data points are ±2 standard errors as a smaller number of
animals were used for the spleen data than for the bone marrow data.
Live bone marrow cell counts (×105) 1 day after 320-kV X-ray
exposures of C.B-17 SCID mice. Cell counts were adjusted to a body
weight of 25 g (reference mouse) using data for cell count per unit body
weight. Each data point represents an individual animal. The dose scale
is linear so the 0.1 Gy group is near the 0-dose group (controls). As
illustrated, there is large variability in the data. The live cell count
data are negatively correlated with radiation dose [r = −0.466; t =
−3.02, p (non-directional) = 0.00482, www.vassarstats.net]; thus there is a significant
radiation dose dependence. The data are suggestive of a negative
curvature dose-response relationship where the magnitude of the slope on
a semi logarithm plot decreases with increasing dose. One outlier
(lowest data point for controls) was excluded in modeling of the
data.Live spleen cell counts (×105) 1 day after 320-kV X-ray
unilateral-single-dose exposures of C.B-17 SCID mice. Cell counts were
adjusted to a body weight of 25 g using data for cell count per unit
body weight. Each data point represents an individual animal. The dose
scale is linear so the 0.1 Gy group is near the 0-dose group (controls).
As illustrated, there is some variability in the data and there is a
clear dose association. Compared to bone marrow, a smaller number of
data points were available at the time of the modeling of the data. A
sufficient number of data points were however available for reliable
modeling as the model used for characterizing in vivo cell survival
fractions has but 2 parameters. One outlier (lowest data point for
controls) was excluded in modeling of the data.Fitted dose-response curve for the bone marrow cell survival fraction
(average) for 320-kV X-ray exposed C.B-17 SCID mice, based on average
bone marrow survival fraction data in Table 1 and HF model
parameters (means) in Table 2. Error bars for the
presented data points are ±1 standard error.
Table 1.
Calculated Values (Averages) for Sck(D) and Related Standard
Deviation (SD) and Standard Error (SE) for Bone Marrow Cells In Vivo
After Unilateral-Single-Dose Exposure of C.B-17 SCID Mice to Filtered
320-kV X Rays, Based on Cell Count Data in Figure 1 Which Is Adjusted for
25 g Mouse.
Dose (Gy)
Number of mice
Sck(D)
SD
SE
0
5a
1
0.830
0.371
0.1
5
1.224b
0.881
0.394
1
6
0.690
0.530
0.216
3
6
0.502
0.365
0.149
4.5
6
0.434
0.346
0.141
7
6
0.404
0.324
0.132
a One outlier (lowest data point) in Figure 1 was excluded.
b Replaced with upper limit 1 when fitting HF model to
the data.
Table 2.
Estimates of Hazard Function (HF) Model Parameters D50ck and
vck for In Vivo Bone Marrow Cell Survival Fraction After
Single-Dose-Unilateral Exposure of C.B-17 Mice to 320-kV X
Rays.a
Parameter
Posterior distribution mean
SD (Monte Carlo error)
2.5%
50%
97.5%
MCMC sample size used
Median effective dose D50ck (Gy)
3.13
1.03 (0.0114)
2.43
4.06
6.44
10,000
Shape parameter vck
0.518
0.19 (0.0025)
0.42
0.71
1.18
10,000
a The % values are percentiles of the distribution of the
many values obtained via Bayesian inference implemented with Markov
chain Monte Carlo (MCMC).
Fitted dose-response curve for spleen cell survival fraction (average)
based on average spleen survival fraction data in Table 3 and HF model
parameters (means) in Table 4. Error bars for the
presented data points are ±2 standard errors as a smaller number of
animals were used for the spleen data than for the bone marrow data.
Table 3.
Calculated Values (Averages) for Sck(D) for Spleen Cells In
Vivo and Related Standard Deviation (SD) and Standard Error (SE) After
Unilateral-Single-Dose Exposure of C.B-17 SCID Mice to Filtered 320-kV X
Rays, Based on Cell Count Data in Figure 2 Which Is Adjusted for
25 g Mouse.
Dose(Gy)
Number of mice
Sck(D)
SD
SE
0
4a
1
0.826
0.413
0.1
5
0.509
0.340
0.152
1
5
0.493
0.331
0.148
3
5
0.527
0.321
0.144
4.5
4
0.286
0.423
0.212
7
3
0.0748
0.0524
0.03
a One outlier with low abnormal cell count excluded.
Table 4.
Estimates of Hazard Function (HF) Model Parameters D50ck and
vck for Spleen Cell Survival After Single-Dose-Unilateral Exposure of
C.B-17 Mice to 320-kV X Rays.a
Parameter
Posterior distribution mean
SD (Monte Carlo error)
2.5%
50%
97.50%
MCMC sample size used
Median effective dose D50ck (Gy)
0.531
0.278 (0.0036)
0.047
0.538
0.977
10,000
Shape parameter vck
0.281
0.164 (0.0019)
0.023
0.271
0.579
10,000
a The % values are percentiles of the distribution of the
many values obtained via Bayesian inference implemented with Markov
chain Monte Carlo (MCMC).
For modeling acute lethality (al) via the hematopoietic mode,
where ck has been used above for cell killing,
al is used for acute lethality via the hematopoietic mode
for HF model functions and the related parameter v, as previously pointed out.
Thus, Sal(D), Hal(D), and Ral(D), and val (for
v) are used for survival function, hazard function, risk function, and shape
parameter respectfully, for acute lethality modeling. Because acute lethality is
the interest, LD50 (for 30-day lethality) is used instead of
D50 as previously pointed out.
Fitting the HF Model to Data for Cell Survival Fraction and Acute Lethality
Frequency
The HF-model-based fitted cell survival fraction and acute lethality frequency
dose-response curves were obtained via Bayesian analysis implemented by Markov
chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) evaluations,
which is the same approach as we have previously used for cell survival.
A formal description of using Bayesian inference in dose-response-data
analysis is provided in the Appendix and is an update of Scott et al.
Vector notations used have changed.With employing MCMC via WinBUGS software,
thousands of iterations were used with some early (during the iterations)
unreliable data discarded (ie, burn-in data discarded), which helps to get
reliable model parameter estimates and related uncertainty (standard deviation
and distributions percentiles). MCMC data autocorrelations were monitored which
helped in deciding how many iterations to use. Twenty thousand iterations
(single MCMC chain) were judged to be more than adequate based on
autocorrelation, probability density plots, and ratios Monte Carlo
error/parameter standard deviation <0.05. For the results presented, of the
20000 data points generated per endpoint (e.g., model parameter vck or val), the
first 10000 were discarded.
Results
Modeling Results for Bone Marrow Cells
Table 1 shows data
for the bone marrow cell survival fraction Sck(D) (an average) that
was obtained based on Equation 6. The standard deviations for
Sck(D) values were obtained via error propagation evaluations.
The related standard errors were obtained from the standard deviation values,
based on sample sizes. Results of application of the HF model to the data in
Table 1 are
provided in Table
2.Calculated Values (Averages) for Sck(D) and Related Standard
Deviation (SD) and Standard Error (SE) for Bone Marrow Cells In Vivo
After Unilateral-Single-Dose Exposure of C.B-17 SCID Mice to Filtered
320-kV X Rays, Based on Cell Count Data in Figure 1 Which Is Adjusted for
25 g Mouse.a One outlier (lowest data point) in Figure 1 was excluded.b Replaced with upper limit 1 when fitting HF model to
the data.Estimates of Hazard Function (HF) Model Parameters D50ck and
vck for In Vivo Bone Marrow Cell Survival Fraction After
Single-Dose-Unilateral Exposure of C.B-17 Mice to 320-kV X
Rays.aa The % values are percentiles of the distribution of the
many values obtained via Bayesian inference implemented with Markov
chain Monte Carlo (MCMC).A negative curvature dose-response relationship for Hck(D) is
implicated by vck <1.0 in Table 2. A negative curvature
dose-response relationship for Hck(D) was also found for in-vivo
killing of bone marrow cells for whole-body, split-dose exposure of anesthetized
immunocompetent C.B-17 mice to 320-kV X rays and Cs-137 γ rays separately.
This also implicates a negative curvature dose-response relationship for
the live bone marrow cells per unit body weight evaluated 1 day after
irradiation. Results in Figure
1 are based on cell counts per unit body weight (in grams) converted
to corresponding cell counts (×105) for a reference 25-g mouse.Data for Sck(D) need to be plotted on semi logarithmic scale (vertical
axis logarithmic) to see a decreasing slope magnitude with increasing dose that
implicates negative curvature. However, Hck(D) can be plotted on
linear vs. linear scales to see negative curvature. In this case, the magnitude
of the positive slope decreases with increasing dose, which is characteristic of
a mixed cell population with hyper-radiosensitive, moderately radiosensitive,
and radioresistant cells (as appears to be the case for both bone marrow and
spleen of C.B-17 mice).
For a negative exponential survival curve, H.In general, vck <1 always indicates negative curvature for Hck(D),
vck = 1 (typical for some in vivo cell survival studies) corresponds to no
curvature for Hck(D), and vck > 1 (typical for some in vitro
studies) indicates positive curvature (magnitude of slope [positive]
increases with dose). For vck = n with n > 1, the slope
of Hck(D) (ie, dHck(D)/dD) increases as D raised to the
n-1 power. For example, for n = 3, the slope at dose D is proportional to D
squared.For acute lethality (eg, via hematopoietic syndrome or gastrointestinal syndrome
mode) rather than cell loss as the endpoint of interest, values of val (replaces
vck) much larger than 1 can occur and dose-response relationships for
Ral(D) has an effective threshold (dose below which the
very small risk calculated has no practical value).
Dose-response relationships for Ral(D) for val > 2 are sigmoidal
(ie, distorted-S shape).
For low radiation doses, Ral(D) and Hal(D) have
essentially the same value for a given dose D.The fitted dose-response relationship obtained for cell survival fraction using
the information in Tables
1 and 2
for bone marrow cell survival after unilateral exposure of C.B-17 SCID mice to
320-kV X rays is shown in Figure 3. Mean (from Bayesian analysis posterior distribution) HF
model parameter estimates were used for the smooth curve. Error bars are ±1
standard error (SE). As already indicated, the fitted curve was obtained via
Bayesian analysis implemented by MCMC evaluations. Data were weighted by
sample size for a given dose level. The calculated average survival
fraction at 0.1 Gy exceeded the upper limit of 1.0 and therefore was set to
1.0.
Modeling Results for Spleen Cells
The average spleen cell survival fraction data used in our Bayesian-inference
modeling are presented in Table 3. Modeling results obtained are presented in Table 4 and are the
basis for the dose-response curve plotted along with the related measured cell
survival fraction data in Figure 4. Based on the mean value of vck (0.281) in Table 4 and 97.5%
(percentile) value (0.597), the dose-response curve for Sck(D)
clearly has negative curvature (ie, vck < 1), and this applies also to the
dose-response curve for Hck(D). The posterior distribution (from
Bayesian analysis) mean value for D50ck (0.531 Gy) for in vivo spleen
cells is much smaller than the corresponding value for bone marrow cells
(D50ck = 3.13 Gy), indicating a much higher (about
6-fold) radio-sensitivity for spleen cells of irradiated C.B-17
SCID un-anesthetized mice at the D50ck dose. The negative curvature
dose-response relationships for Sck(D) and Hck(D) for both
cell types can be explained on the basis of a mixture of cells with different
radiosensitivity distributions for both spleen and bone marrow.
Interestingly, for spleen there is strong evidence for a
hyper-radiosensitive subpopulation, where 50% of all cells are eliminated by a
dose of approximately 0.5 Gy (500 mGy). This is not the case for bone
marrow.Calculated Values (Averages) for Sck(D) for Spleen Cells In
Vivo and Related Standard Deviation (SD) and Standard Error (SE) After
Unilateral-Single-Dose Exposure of C.B-17 SCID Mice to Filtered 320-kV X
Rays, Based on Cell Count Data in Figure 2 Which Is Adjusted for
25 g Mouse.a One outlier with low abnormal cell count excluded.Estimates of Hazard Function (HF) Model Parameters D50ck and
vck for Spleen Cell Survival After Single-Dose-Unilateral Exposure of
C.B-17 Mice to 320-kV X Rays.aa The % values are percentiles of the distribution of the
many values obtained via Bayesian inference implemented with Markov
chain Monte Carlo (MCMC).
Modeling Results for Acute Lethality
Data for 30-day lethality of 320-kV, X-ray-exposed C.B-17 SCID mice are presented
in Table 5 and are
presumed to be associated with the hematopoietic syndrome mode. Although there
were a relative small number of animals involved, there are but 2 HF model
parameters that need to be assessed so that the data are still valuable.
Bayesian inference implemented via MCMC was also used for modeling the data. HF
Model parameter estimates (posterior distribution means) and related statistics
(standard deviation and specific percentiles) are presented in Table 6.
Table 5.
Thirty-Day Mortality Data for C.B-17 SCID Mice After
Unilateral-Single-Dose Exposure to 320 kV X Rays.
Dose (in grays)
Mice
Deaths in thirty days
Thirty-day mortality
0
10
0
0
0.1
10
0
0
1
10
0
0
3
10
0
0
4.5
10
10
1.0a
7
10
10
1.0
a The value was entered as 0.999 in the MCMC analysis to
facilitate estimating the 2 model parameters LD50 and
val.
Table 6.
Estimates of Hazard Function Model (HF) Parameters (for 320-kV X-Ray
Exposed C.B-17 SCID Mice) for Acute Lethality via the Hematopoietic
Mode.a
Parameter
Posterior distribution mean
Standard deviation
2.5%
50%
97.5%
MCMC sample size used
Shape parameter val
6.08
2.43
1.52
6.21
9.8
10,000
LD50 (Gy)
3.79
0.68
2.54
3.76
5.33
10,000
a The % values are percentiles of the distribution of the
many values obtained via MCMC analysis.
Thirty-Day Mortality Data for C.B-17 SCID Mice After
Unilateral-Single-Dose Exposure to 320 kV X Rays.a The value was entered as 0.999 in the MCMC analysis to
facilitate estimating the 2 model parameters LD50 and
val.Estimates of Hazard Function Model (HF) Parameters (for 320-kV X-Ray
Exposed C.B-17 SCID Mice) for Acute Lethality via the Hematopoietic
Mode.aa The % values are percentiles of the distribution of the
many values obtained via MCMC analysis.
Discussion
Studies using small animal models of hematopoietic system cell survival after
exposure to X rays or γ rays has been a practice for decades and are important for
bone marrow transplantation, medical counter measures, and other study-protocol planning.
Previously we performed successful bone marrow transplantation in Cs-137
γ-ray, split-dose exposed (bilaterally) C.B-17 immunocompetent anesthetized mice
but not with now-considered “not comparable” effective doses (based on an
updated RBE estimate) of 320-kV X rays from the same X-RAD 320 irradiator as used in
our present studies. Based on careful consideration of the research data generated,
we think the most likely reason for the lack of success for 320 kV X rays was due to
the RBE estimate (RBE = 1.3) used in the study design being too large, leading to
the absorbed doses used being too small. Based on physical microdosimetry performed
by others
for bone marrow of mice, an RBE ≈ 1 would be expected for filtered (HVL ≈
4-mm Cu) 320-kV X rays. This suggests that the X-ray doses we used should have been
about a factor of 1.3 higher (ie, same doses as used for Cs-137 γ rays).The dose-response relationship for 30-day lethality in mice has traditionally been
used for characterizing the risk of mortality via the hematopoietic-syndrome mode
(bone marrow failure related).
For brief single-dose exposure at a high dose rate, the risk curve for this
mode of death has previously been characterized using the HF Model
and the model was therefore also used in this paper for modeling the risk of
acute lethality via this mode for the C.B-17 SCID mice exposed to filtered 320-kV X
rays. However, as previously found
and also found in this new research, model parameter values for acute
lethality are quite different than those for the cell survival fraction in vivo.The shape parameter for in vitro studies of cell survival fraction may also differ
from that for in vivo radiation exposure. Exponential cell survival fraction curves
(ie, vck = 1) were previously used for characterizing in vitro cell survival of
bronchial epithelial cells (HBEC-13 and HBEC-2) exposed to 320-kV X rays or Cs-137 γ rays.
The exponential nature of the survival curves allowed for the introduction of
a new area of dosimetric research, namely biological
microdosimetry.
However, this form of microdosimetry is not widely known.We had planned to repeat our previous X-ray study related to bone marrow
transplantation using higher does and C.B-17 immunocompetent mice, but the
immunocompetent mice are no longer available as they have been replaced by an
immunodeficient (immunocompromised) strain as already indicated. Under the
hypothesis that dose-response relationships for the in vivo cell
survival fraction for bone marrow and spleen have similar curvature
(ie, displaying negative curvature) for the immunocompetent and immunodeficientmice, we conducted X-ray dose-response modeling using newly generated (at Lovelace
Biomedical Research Institute) bone marrow and spleen cell survival fraction data
for C.B-17 SCID mice reported in this paper to test our assumption. As demonstrated
in Figures 3 and 4 along with associated
central estimates (mean of modeled distribution) of the shape parameter vck (< 1)
in Tables 2 and 4, this is indeed the
case at 1 day post radiation exposure.As is revealed in Figure 5
(results based on modeling of cell survival fractions for subpopulations of cells)
for 320-kV X-ray irradiated C.B-17 SCID mice, there appears to be a subpopulation of
bone marrow cells in vivo that are radioresistant. Based on results
for the LD99 (for 99% acute lethality of the mice), this
radioresistant subpopulation may be as large as about 40% of the total cell
population of the immunodeficientmice. Such a large percentage
essentially guarantees a negative curvature dose-response relationship, with much
larger doses than 7 Gy being needed to reduce the cell survival fraction to a level
that would permit successful bone marrow transplantation based on published results
for immunocompetent C.B-17 mice.
Regarding the radioresistant cell subpopulation for bone marrow, which cell
types are represented cannot be resolved from the data used in our analyzes. For
spleen, some cell type enrichment information related to high doses can be derived
from findings from a study by others
that are discussed in a subsequent paragraph.
Figure 5.
HF-model-based expected bone marrow cells subpopulations survival fraction
curves for S1ck(D ≤ LD1), indicated as SckLD1;
S50ck(D ≤ LD50), indicated as SckLD50;
S99ck(D ≤ LD99), indicated as SckLD99; full cell
population survival fraction Sck(D), indicated as Sck; and
expected risk of lethality Ral(D) via the hematopoietic syndrome
mode, indicated as RiskHM. Results apply to immunodeficient C.B-7 mice
single-dose-unilaterally exposed 320-kV X rays. For the acute lethality risk
curve, LD1 = 1.9 Gy, LD50 = 3.79 Gy, LD99 =
5.19 Gy.
HF-model-based expected bone marrow cells subpopulations survival fraction
curves for S1ck(D ≤ LD1), indicated as SckLD1;
S50ck(D ≤ LD50), indicated as SckLD50;
S99ck(D ≤ LD99), indicated as SckLD99; full cell
population survival fraction Sck(D), indicated as Sck; and
expected risk of lethality Ral(D) via the hematopoietic syndrome
mode, indicated as RiskHM. Results apply to immunodeficient C.B-7 mice
single-dose-unilaterally exposed 320-kV X rays. For the acute lethality risk
curve, LD1 = 1.9 Gy, LD50 = 3.79 Gy, LD99 =
5.19 Gy.It was informative to have considered in Figure 5 the relationship between survival
of subpopulations of bone marrow cells and the risk of acute lethality as a function
of the radiation absorbed dose of 320-kV X rays and of acute lethality (for mice)
dose percentiles LD1, LD50, and LD99. With the
indicated predicted loss of a large number of hyper-radiosensitive and
radiosensitive cells at the LD01 (for acute lethality of mice) of 1.9 Gy,
there is little if any expected increase in the risk of acute lethality via the
hematopoietic-syndrome mode. This is not the case for the predicted cell losses at
the LD50 (for expected acute lethality in 50% of mice) of 3.79 Gy where
large numbers of cells of moderate radiosensitivity in addition to
hyper-radiosensitive and radiosensitive cells are predicted to be lost. For the
LD99, the predicted cell loss is worse (more subpopulations lost) but
even so, greater than 35% of bone marrow cells (radioresistant) are expected to
survive (Figures 6 and
7) but a somewhat
smaller fraction (less than 30%) of radioresistant spleen cells.
Figure 6.
Expected relationship between modeled lethal dose (for animal lethality)
percentiles LD1, LD20, LD50,
LD90, and LD99 and modeled cell survival fractions
Sck(D) (for total cell population) for bone marrow and spleen
for 320-kV X-ray-exposed, immunodefficient C.B-17 mice, based on HF models
for cell killing and for acute lethality via the hematopoietic mode. Numbers
on top of the 3D objects are the expected average cell survival fractions.
Values for LDxx: LD1 = 1.9 Gy, LD20 = 3.13
Gy, LD50 = 3.79 Gy, LD90 = 4.62 Gy, and
LD99 = 5.19 Gy.
Figure 7.
Modeled bone marrow cell survival fractions for immunocompetent (S_IC) C.B-17
mice bilaterally exposed to 320-kV X rays (model parameters from: Scott et al
; Gott et al
), for immunocompetent (SCs137) C.B-17 mice bilaterally exposed to
Cs-137 γ rays (model parameters from: Scott et al
; Gott et al
), and immunodeficient (S_ID) C.B-17 mice unilaterally exposed to
320-kV X rays. LDxx (for animal lethality) for doses in
increasing order are LD1, LD20, LD50,
LD90, and LD99.
Expected relationship between modeled lethal dose (for animal lethality)
percentiles LD1, LD20, LD50,
LD90, and LD99 and modeled cell survival fractions
Sck(D) (for total cell population) for bone marrow and spleen
for 320-kV X-ray-exposed, immunodefficient C.B-17 mice, based on HF models
for cell killing and for acute lethality via the hematopoietic mode. Numbers
on top of the 3D objects are the expected average cell survival fractions.
Values for LDxx: LD1 = 1.9 Gy, LD20 = 3.13
Gy, LD50 = 3.79 Gy, LD90 = 4.62 Gy, and
LD99 = 5.19 Gy.Modeled bone marrow cell survival fractions for immunocompetent (S_IC) C.B-17
mice bilaterally exposed to 320-kV X rays (model parameters from: Scott et al
; Gott et al
), for immunocompetent (SCs137) C.B-17 mice bilaterally exposed to
Cs-137 γ rays (model parameters from: Scott et al
; Gott et al
), and immunodeficient (S_ID) C.B-17 mice unilaterally exposed to
320-kV X rays. LDxx (for animal lethality) for doses in
increasing order are LD1, LD20, LD50,
LD90, and LD99.Interestingly, regarding the highest 320-kV X-ray dose in Figure 6 (LD99 = 5.19 Gy), had a
somewhat higher dose (eg, 5.2 Gy) been used in the bone marrow transplantation study
performed by Gott et al,
where the central estimate of the highest X-ray dose actually used is 4.8 Gy
(rounded), successful bone marrow engraftment would be expected as can be inferred
from our modeling results in Figure 7. The modeling results (bone marrow survival fractions) in Figure 7 are for the same
absorbed doses (LD01, LD20, LD50, LD90,
and LD99, respectfully) as in Figure 6 and results for Cs-137 γ rays and
320-kV X rays for immunocompetent mice are also included for comparison. Successful
engraftment was achieved after using a 137Cs-γ-ray dose of 5.1 Gy
(central estimate) and a dose of 6.6 Gy (central estimate).
Based on the study of Gott et al
with γ rays, we expect that the bone marrow cell survival fraction would need
to be reduced to around 0.15 (15% cell survival) for successful bone marrow
engraftment. The 15% survival also relates to the radioresistant subpopulation of
cells as can be inferred from Figure 7. These findings support possible successful use of the
X-RAD 320 irradiator along with immunocompetent mice (e.g., immunocompetent
BALB/c mice) in bone marrow transplantation studies.The notion that bone marrow and spleen cellularity after exposure at the level of the
LD99 is likely to be comprised of highly radioresistant cells (via
cellular enrichment) is supported by findings of Harrington et al
for splenocytes in vivo. Their flow cytometric analysis of spleen of C57Bl/6
mice whole-body exposed at 1.15 Gy/min to 137Cs γ rays revealed both a
decrease in spleen cellularity (similar to results in Figure 4) and an alteration in the relative
composition of constituent spleen cell populations as dose increased. This was
interpreted by the researchers to reflect differential
radiosensitivity along with selective enrichment of NK
cells (seven-fold) and CD4+ T lymphocytes (3-fold). The enrichment occurred within 1
week after radiation exposure, which is longer follow-up than for our presented data
for immunodeficient and immunocompetent C.B-17 mice. Our results relate only to cell
survival fractions 1 day after radiation exposure. For a longer period before
assessing cell survival, some repopulation of cells could occur.Our view that successful bone marrow engraftment studies in mice could be achieved
using 320-kV X rays is supported by results of others
who achieved successful bone marrow engraftment in male C57BL/6 mice
whole-body exposed via an X-ray source irradiator (Rad Source 2000 X-ray Biologic
Irradiator, Rad Source Technologies, Alpharetta, GA). They also achieved successful
engraftment using 137Cs γ rays (Irradiator: Gamma Cell 40, MSD Nordion,
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). Based on their research results, it was concluded by the
researchers that although both sources ablated endogenous bone marrow sufficiently
to allow for successful bone marrow engraftment, there were distinct physiologic
responses that should be considered when choosing the best radiation source for such
studies. A key observation was that radiation from the X-ray source used was
associated with higher overall morbidity due to opportunistic infection
than was the case for 137Cs γ rays.Our present study focused on C.B-17 SCID mice while our earlier studies
used immunocompetent C.B-17 mice as already indicated. X-ray exposure
research was initiated in 2020 by our research team using immunocompetent BALB/c
mice. The genetic background of the C.B-17 strain is the same as for the immune
competent BALB/c mice. The only difference is that BALB/c mice carry the Igh-1b
allele of the C57BL/Ka strain. Preliminary findings are suggestive of negative
curvature dose-response relationships for both bone marrow and spleen cells in vivo,
similar to findings for immunocompetent C.B-17 mice. Similar radiosensitivities of
the immunocompetent C.B-17 mice and BALB/c mice is also suggested, which if
validated would support the view that C.B-17 SCID mice may be more radioresistant
than immunocompetent C.B-17 mice. However, formal modeling of the BALB/c data would
need to be taken up in a follow-on project. Thus, we hope to address the modeling
needs and any additional experimental research needs in a follow-on research
project.
Conclusions
We have demonstrated through dose-response modeling with the previously-introduced HF
model and Bayesian inference that dose-response relationships for the in vivo cell
survival fractions for both bone marrow and spleen cells of 320-kV X-ray exposed
C.B-17 SCID mice exhibit negative curvature (vck < 1), explainable based on
subpopulations of cells with differing radiosensitivity distributions.
Hyper-radiosensitive cells are removed by very low radiation doses (eg, 0.1 Gy) and
many radioresistant cells survive even a 70-fold higher radiation doses (ie, 7 Gy).
The 7 Gy X-ray dose likely led to enrichment of radioresistant cells.For acute lethality via the hematopoietic syndrome mode, the dose-response
relationship for the lethality hazard Hal(D) (and related survival
probability Sal(D)) has positive curvature (shape parameter val > 1)
and can be explained on the basis of the mixed subpopulations of cells that are
killed by radiation doses above an effective threshold (for animal lethality) and up
to near the acute lethality dose percentile LD99. However, the
dose-response relationship for the risk Ral(D) of acute lethality via the
hematopoietic syndrome mode is sigmoidal.Radiation sources such as 320-kV X rays from an X-RAD 320 irradiator and other
irradiators (eg, Rad Source 2000 X-ray Biologic Irradiator) are suitable for in vivo
studies of cell survival in mice. While successful bone marrow transplantation in
mice has been demonstrated using the Rad Source 2000 X-ray Biologic Irradiator, this
is not the case for the X-RAD 320 device. Thus, there is still a need to verify that
filtered 320-kV X rays from an X-RAD 320 device can be successfully used in a bone
marrow transplantation study using a mouse model.A key finding for C.B-17 SCID mice when compared to results previously obtained for
immunocompetent C.B-17 mice is that the immunodeficientmice appear to be markedly
more radioresistant, implicating a possible key role of the immune system capacity
in radiosensitivity of mammals. However, confirmation will necessitate additional
research.
Authors: Brian W Gibson; Nathan C Boles; George P Souroullas; Alan J Herron; Joe K Fraley; Rebecca S Schwiebert; John J Sharp; Margaret A Goodell Journal: Comp Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Yannick Poirier; Matthew D Belley; Mark W Dewhirst; Terry T Yoshizumic; Julian D Down Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: P Artur Plett; Carol H Sampson; Hui Lin Chua; Mandar Joshi; Catherine Booth; Alec Gough; Cynthia S Johnson; Barry P Katz; Ann M Farese; Jeffrey Parker; Thomas J MacVittie; Christie M Orschell Journal: Health Phys Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 1.316