Literature DB >> 19125028

Widespread auditory deficits in tune deafness.

Jennifer L Jones1, Christopher Zalewski, Carmen Brewer, Jay Lucker, Dennis Drayna.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate auditory function in individuals with deficits in musical pitch perception. We hypothesized that such individuals have deficits in nonspeech areas of auditory processing.
DESIGN: We screened 865 randomly selected individuals to identify those who scored poorly on the Distorted Tunes test (DTT), a measure of musical pitch recognition ability. Those who scored poorly were given a comprehensive audiologic examination, and those with hearing loss or other confounding audiologic factors were excluded from further testing. Thirty-five individuals with tune deafness constituted the experimental group. Thirty-four individuals with normal hearing and normal DTT scores, matched for age, gender, handedness, and education, and without overt or reported psychiatric disorders made up the normal control group. Individual and group performance for pure-tone frequency discrimination at 1000 Hz was determined by measuring the difference limen for frequency (DLF). Auditory processing abilities were assessed using tests of pitch pattern recognition, duration pattern recognition, and auditory gap detection. In addition, we evaluated both attention and short- and long-term memory as variables that might influence performance on our experimental measures. Differences between groups were evaluated statistically using Wilcoxon nonparametric tests and t-tests as appropriate.
RESULTS: The DLF at 1000 Hz in the group with tune deafness was significantly larger than that of the normal control group. However, approximately one-third of participants with tune deafness had DLFs within the range of performance observed in the control group. Many individuals with tune deafness also displayed a high degree of variability in their intertrial frequency discrimination performance that could not be explained by deficits in memory or attention. Pitch and duration pattern discrimination and auditory gap-detection ability were significantly poorer in the group with tune deafness than the normal control group. Approximately one-third of our participants with tune deafness displayed evidence of attention deficit with hyperactivity disorder on the Test of Variables of Attention. Test of Variables of Attention scores were significantly correlated with gap-detection scores, but not significantly correlated with any of the other experimental measures, including the DTT, DLF, and auditory pattern discrimination tests. Short- and long-term memory was not significantly related to any of the experimental measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with tune deafness identified by the DTT have poor performance on many tests of auditory function. These include pure-tone frequency discrimination, pitch and duration pattern discrimination, and temporal resolution. Overall, reduction in performance does not seem to derive from deficits in memory or attention. However, because of the prevalence of attention deficit with hyperactivity disorder in those with tune deafness, this variable should be considered as a potentially confounding factor in future studies of tune deafness and its characteristics. Pure-tone frequency discrimination varied widely in individuals with tune deafness, and the high degree of intertrial variability suggests that frequency discrimination may be unstable in tune-deaf individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19125028      PMCID: PMC2673726          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31818ff95e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  38 in total

1.  Evidence for the role of the right auditory cortex in fine pitch resolution.

Authors:  Krista L Hyde; Isabelle Peretz; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Pitch, periodicity, and auditory organization.

Authors:  W M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests.

Authors:  F E Musiek
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Correlation between the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery five-minute hearing test and standard audiologic data.

Authors:  K J Koike; M K Hurst; S J Wetmore
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Tracking a temporal gap in band-limited noise: frequency and level effects.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-05

Review 6.  Varieties of musical disorders. The Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia.

Authors:  Isabelle Peretz; Annie Sophie Champod; Krista Hyde
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Brains that are out of tune but in time.

Authors:  Krista L Hyde; Isabelle Peretz
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-05

8.  On tune deafness (dysmelodia): frequency, development, genetics and musical background.

Authors:  H Kalmus; D B Fry
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 1.670

Review 9.  Brain specialization for music.

Authors:  Isabelle Peretz
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.519

10.  Deficient auditory interhemispheric transfer in patients with PAX6 mutations.

Authors:  Doris-Eva Bamiou; Frank E Musiek; Sanjay M Sisodiya; Samantha L Free; Rosalyn A Davies; Anthony Moore; Veronica van Heyningen; Linda M Luxon
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  11 in total

1.  Impaired categorical perception of lexical tones in Mandarin-speaking congenital amusics.

Authors:  Cunmei Jiang; Jeff P Hamm; Vanessa K Lim; Ian J Kirk; Yufang Yang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

Review 2.  Central auditory disorders: toward a neuropsychology of auditory objects.

Authors:  Johanna C Goll; Sebastian J Crutch; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.710

3.  Pitch perception and production in congenital amusia: Evidence from Cantonese speakers.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Alice H D Chan; Valter Ciocca; Catherine Roquet; Isabelle Peretz; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory and cognitive deficits associated with acquired amusia after stroke: a magnetoencephalography and neuropsychological follow-up study.

Authors:  Teppo Särkämö; Mari Tervaniemi; Seppo Soinila; Taina Autti; Heli M Silvennoinen; Matti Laine; Marja Hietanen; Elina Pihko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Faster decline of pitch memory over time in congenital amusia.

Authors:  Victoria J Williamson; Claire McDonald; Diana Deutsch; Timothy D Griffiths; Lauren Stewart
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-04-26

6.  Relating pitch awareness to phonemic awareness in children: implications for tone-deafness and dyslexia.

Authors:  Psyche Loui; Kenneth Kroog; Jennifer Zuk; Ellen Winner; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-30

7.  The mechanism of speech processing in congenital amusia: evidence from Mandarin speakers.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Cunmei Jiang; William Forde Thompson; Yi Xu; Yufang Yang; Lauren Stewart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Altered retrieval of melodic information in congenital amusia: insights from dynamic causal modeling of MEG data.

Authors:  Philippe Albouy; Jérémie Mattout; Gaëtan Sanchez; Barbara Tillmann; Anne Caclin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  (A)musicality in Williams syndrome: examining relationships among auditory perception, musical skill, and emotional responsiveness to music.

Authors:  Miriam D Lense; Carolyn M Shivers; Elisabeth M Dykens
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-16

10.  Impaired encoding of rapid pitch information underlies perception and memory deficits in congenital amusia.

Authors:  Philippe Albouy; Marion Cousineau; Anne Caclin; Barbara Tillmann; Isabelle Peretz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.