Literature DB >> 19124036

On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry.

Daniel H Baker1, Erich W Graf.   

Abstract

When our two eyes view incompatible images, the brain invokes suppressive processes to inhibit one image, and favor the other. Two phenomena are typically observed: dichoptic masking (reduced sensitivity to one image) for brief presentations, and binocular rivalry (alternation between the two images), over longer exposures. However, it is not clear if these two phenomena arise from a common suppressive process. We investigated this by measuring both threshold elevation in simultaneous dichoptic masking and mean percept durations in rivalry, whilst varying relative stimulus orientation. Masking and rivalry showed significant correlations, such that strong masking was associated with long dominance durations. A second experiment suggested that individual differences across both measures are also correlated. These findings are consistent with varying the magnitude of interocular suppression in computational models of both rivalry and masking, and imply the existence of a common suppressive process. Since dichoptic masking has been localised to the monocular neurons of V1, this is a plausible first stage of binocular rivalry.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19124036     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  18 in total

1.  Deconstructing continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Contrast gain-control in stereo depth and cyclopean contrast perception.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Ju Liang; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Semantic analysis does not occur in the absence of awareness induced by interocular suppression.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jocelyn L Sy; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Contrast and phase combination in binocular vision.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Jiawei Zhou; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Crossmodal constraints on human perceptual awareness: auditory semantic modulation of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Su-Ling Yeh; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-09-12

7.  Interactions between surround suppression and interocular suppression in human vision.

Authors:  Yong-Chun Cai; Shena Lu; Chao-Yi Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Deconstructing Interocular Suppression: Attention and Divisive Normalization.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Ocular dominance plasticity: inhibitory interactions and contrast equivalence.

Authors:  Daniel P Spiegel; Alex S Baldwin; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  What is the primary cause of individual differences in contrast sensitivity?

Authors:  Daniel H Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.