Literature DB >> 19123734

Physician satisfaction with clinical laboratory services: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 138 institutions.

Bruce A Jones1, Leonas G Bekeris, Raouf E Nakhleh, Molly K Walsh, Paul N Valenstein.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Monitoring customer satisfaction is a valuable component of a laboratory quality improvement program.
OBJECTIVE: To survey the level of physician satisfaction with hospital clinical laboratory services.
DESIGN: Participating institutions provided demographic and practice information and survey results of physician satisfaction with defined aspects of clinical laboratory services, rated on a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent).
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight institutions participated in this study and submitted a total of 4329 physician surveys. The overall satisfaction score for all institutions ranged from 2.9 to 5.0. The median overall score for all participants was 4.1 (10th percentile, 3.6; 90th percentile, 4.5). Physicians were most satisfied with the quality/reliability of results and staff courtesy, with median values of excellent or good ratings of 89.9%. Of the 5 service categories that received the lowest percentage values of excellent/good ratings (combined scores of 4 and 5), 4 were related to turnaround time for inpatient stat, outpatient stat, routine, and esoteric tests. Surveys from half of the participating laboratories reported that 96% to 100% of physicians would recommend the laboratory to other physicians. The category most frequently selected as the most important category of laboratory services was quality/reliability of results (31.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: There continues to be a high level of physician satisfaction and loyalty with clinical laboratory services. Test turnaround times are persistent categories of dissatisfaction and present opportunities for improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19123734     DOI: 10.5858/133.1.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  12 in total

Review 1.  Turnaround Time (TAT): Difference in Concept for Laboratory and Clinician.

Authors:  Hara P Pati; Gurmeet Singh
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Does electronic clinical microbiology results reporting influence medical decision making: a pre- and post-interview study of medical specialists.

Authors:  Marjan J Bruins; Gijs J H M Ruijs; Maurice J H M Wolfhagen; Peter Bloembergen; Jos E C M Aarts
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Formative evaluation of a telemedicine model for delivering clinical neurophysiology services part II: the referring clinician and patient perspective.

Authors:  Patricia Breen; Kevin Murphy; Geraldine Browne; Fiona Molloy; Valerie Reid; Colin Doherty; Norman Delanty; Sean Connolly; Mary Fitzsimons
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Customer satisfaction survey with clinical laboratory and phlebotomy services at a tertiary care unit level.

Authors:  Young Rae Koh; Shine Young Kim; In Suk Kim; Chulhun L Chang; Eun Yup Lee; Han Chul Son; Hyung Hoi Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Impact of reference change value (RCV) based autoverification on turnaround time and physician satisfaction.

Authors:  Esther Fernández-Grande; Carolina Valera-Rodriguez; Luis Sáenz-Mateos; Amparo Sastre-Gómez; Pilar García-Chico; Teodoro J Palomino-Muñoz
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

6.  Do Academic Health Care Systems Really Value Education? A Survey of Academic Plastic Surgeons.

Authors:  Helen H Sun; Navid Pourtaheri; Jeffrey E Janis; Devra B Becker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-10-16

7.  Clients and clinician satisfaction with laboratory services at selected government hospitals in eastern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Zelalem Teklemariam; Abiyu Mekonnen; Haji Kedir; Getachew Kabew
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-01-16

8.  Laboratory-based clinical audit as a tool for continual improvement: an example from CSF chemistry turnaround time audit in a South-African teaching hospital.

Authors:  Lucius C Imoh; Mubanga Mutale; Christopher T Parker; Rajiv T Erasmus; Annalise E Zemlin
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.313

9.  High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays - How to Implement them Successfully.

Authors:  Frederick K Korley; Allan S Jaffe
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2016-08-01

10.  Impact of Clinical Information on the Turnaround Time in Surgical Histopathology: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Syed Muhammad Hammad Ali; Usama Muhammad Kathia; Muhammad Umar Masood Gondal; Ahsan Zil-E-Ali; Haseeb Khan; Sabiha Riaz
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.