Literature DB >> 19123676

Estimation of mammographic density on an interval scale by transillumination breast spectroscopy.

Kristina M Blackmore1, Samantha Dick, Julia Knight, Lothar Lilge.   

Abstract

Transillumination breast spectroscopy (TiBS) uses nonionizing optical radiation to gain information about breast tissue morphological and structural properties. TiBS spectra are obtained from 232 women and compared to mammographic density (MD) quantified using Cumulus. The ability of TiBS to estimate MD is assessed using partial least-squares (PLS) regression methods, which requires TiBS spectra as input (X) and Cumulus MD as target (Y) data. Multiple PLS models are considered to determine the optimal processing technique(s) for the input (X) and target (Y) data. For each model, the association between TiBS estimated MD (Y) and Cumulus MD (Y) is established using Spearman's rank correlation and linear regression analysis. The model that best estimates MD has the fewest assumptions regarding target (Y) and spectral (X) processing. The Spearman's correlation coefficient between predicted MD and Cumulus MD for this model is 0.88, with a regression slope (beta) of 0.93 (95% CI 0.83-1.02) and an R(2) of 0.78. The approximation of individual MD was within 10% of Cumulus MD for the majority of women (80%), without stratification on age, body mass index (BMI), and menopausal status. TiBS provides an alternative to mammography assessed MD enabling frequent and earlier use of MD as a risk marker in preventive oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19123676     DOI: 10.1117/1.3041498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  6 in total

1.  Automated Breast Density Measurements From Chest Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Touseef A Qureshi; Harini Veeraraghavan; Janice S Sung; Jennifer B Kaplan; Jessica Flynn; Emily S Tonorezos; Suzanne L Wolden; Elizabeth A Morris; Kevin C Oeffinger; Malcolm C Pike; Chaya S Moskowitz
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Performance assessment of diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging instruments in a 2-year multicenter breast cancer trial

Authors:  Thomas D. O'Sullivan; Albert Cerussi; Amanda Durkin; Brian Hill; Nola Hylton; Arjun G. Yodh; Stefan A. Carp; David Boas; Shudong Jiang; Keith D. Paulsen; Brian Pogue; Darren Roblyer; Wei Yang; Bruce J. Tromberg
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 3.  Radiologic and near-infrared/optical spectroscopic imaging: where is the synergy?

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Frederic Leblond; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Opportunistic Breast Density Assessment in Women Receiving Low-dose Chest Computed Tomography Screening.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Siwa Chan; Nan-Han Lu; Yifan Li; Yu Chieh Tsai; Po Yun Huang; Chia-Ju Chang; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Optical imaging correlates with magnetic resonance imaging breast density and reveals composition changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas D O'Sullivan; Anaïs Leproux; Jeon-Hor Chen; Shadfar Bahri; Alex Matlock; Darren Roblyer; Christine E McLaren; Wen-Pin Chen; Albert E Cerussi; Min-Ying Su; Bruce J Tromberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 6.  Imaging Breast Density: Established and Emerging Modalities.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Gultekin Gulsen; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.243

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.