Literature DB >> 19123249

Effects of parity on pelvic size and shape dimorphism in Mus.

Heidi Schutz1, Edward Robert Donovan, Jack P Hayes.   

Abstract

The pelvis is a sexually dimorphic structure and although the causes of that dimorphism have long been studied, relatively little is known regarding the effects of partuitive events on the magnitude of that dimorphism. Here, we use a sample of Mus musculus domesticus to contrast dimorphism in body length and os coxae size and shape between males and parous and nulliparous females. We also test for correlations between relative litter size (L/M) and relative offspring size (O/M) with body length and os coxae size and shape in parous females. Males had greater body length than nulliparous females but were not different from parous females. Females as a whole had the largest os coxae, with parous females having the largest and males the smallest. Os coxae shape was also significantly different between groups and was most divergent between parous females and males than between nulliparous females and males. Os coxae shape differences between females are associated with differences in body length between females and O/M is correlated with os coxae shape in parous females such that females with the largest offspring have the most divergent shapes along the relative warp one axis. Pelvic shape differences between males and females were consistent with previous findings in other taxa which identify the pubo-ischial complex as the primary region of dimorphism. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19123249     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  10 in total

1.  Reproduction triggers adaptive increases in body size in female mole-rats.

Authors:  Jack Thorley; Nathan Katlein; Katy Goddard; Markus Zöttl; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sacro-femoral-pubic angle: a coronal parameter to estimate pelvic tilt.

Authors:  Benjamin Blondel; Frank Schwab; Ashish Patel; Jason Demakakos; Bertrand Moal; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Sex differences in the pelvis did not evolve de novo in modern humans.

Authors:  Barbara Fischer; Nicole D S Grunstra; Eva Zaffarini; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Evaluation of demographic factors affecting predictability of the sacro-femoral-pubic angle in healthy adolescents.

Authors:  Zhen Liu; Hongda Bao; Yong Qiu; Jun Qiao; Leilei Xu; Feng Zhu; Bangping Qian; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Developmental evidence for obstetric adaptation of the human female pelvis.

Authors:  Alik Huseynov; Christoph P E Zollikofer; Walter Coudyzer; Dominic Gascho; Christian Kellenberger; Ricarda Hinzpeter; Marcia S Ponce de León
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Pelvic sexual dimorphism among species monomorphic in body size: relationship to relative newborn body mass.

Authors:  Robert G Tague
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Variation in pelvic shape and size in Eastern European males: a computed tomography comparative study.

Authors:  Bartosz Musielak; Anna Maria Kubicka; Michał Rychlik; Jarosław Czubak; Adam Czwojdziński; Andrzej Grzegorzewski; Marek Jóźwiak
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Pregnancy associated plasma protein A2 (PAPP-A2) affects bone size and shape and contributes to natural variation in postnatal growth in mice.

Authors:  Julian Kenneth Christians; Devin Rhys de Zwaan; Sunny Ho Yeung Fung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Microgravity induces pelvic bone loss through osteoclastic activity, osteocytic osteolysis, and osteoblastic cell cycle inhibition by CDKN1a/p21.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Blaber; Natalya Dvorochkin; Chialing Lee; Joshua S Alwood; Rukhsana Yousuf; Piero Pianetta; Ruth K Globus; Brendan P Burns; Eduardo A C Almeida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein (PAPP)-A2 in Physiology and Disease.

Authors:  Vicente Barrios; Julie A Chowen; Álvaro Martín-Rivada; Santiago Guerra-Cantera; Jesús Pozo; Shoshana Yakar; Ron G Rosenfeld; Luis A Pérez-Jurado; Juan Suárez; Jesús Argente
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 6.600

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.