Literature DB >> 19123118

Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.

Bradley J Poole1, Michael J Kane.   

Abstract

Variation in working-memory capacity (WMC) predicts individual differences in only some attention-control capabilities. Whereas higher WMC subjects outperform lower WMC subjects in tasks requiring the restraint of prepotent but inappropriate responses, and the constraint of attentional focus to target stimuli against distractors, they do not differ in prototypical visual-search tasks, even those that yield steep search slopes and engender top-down control. The present three experiments tested whether WMC, as measured by complex memory span tasks, would predict search latencies when the 1-8 target locations to be searched appeared alone, versus appearing among distractor locations to be ignored, with the latter requiring selective attentional focus. Subjects viewed target-location cues and then fixated on those locations over either long (1,500-1,550 ms) or short (300 ms) delays. Higher WMC subjects identified targets faster than did lower WMC subjects only in the presence of distractors and only over long fixation delays. WMC thus appears to affect subjects' ability to maintain a constrained attentional focus over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19123118     DOI: 10.1080/17470210802479329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  34 in total

1.  Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Audio-visual object search is changed by bilingual experience.

Authors:  Sarah Chabal; Scott R Schroeder; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.

Authors:  Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The working memory stroop effect: when internal representations clash with external stimuli.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-06-23

Review 5.  A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

6.  The persistence of thought: evidence for a role of working memory in the maintenance of task-unrelated thinking.

Authors:  Daniel B Levinson; Jonathan Smallwood; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-03-14

7.  Comparing visual search and eye movements in bilinguals and monolinguals.

Authors:  Ileana Ratiu; Michael C Hout; Stephen C Walenchok; Tamiko Azuma; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Effects of working memory training in young and old adults.

Authors:  Claudia C von Bastian; Nicolas Langer; Lutz Jäncke; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-05

9.  Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Georgina M Gross; Charlotte A Chun; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-06-16

Review 10.  High working memory capacity does not always attenuate distraction: Bayesian evidence in support of the null hypothesis.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; John E Marsh; Anatole Nöstl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.