Literature DB >> 19122880

The Use of Semantic Differential Scaling to Define the Multi-Dimensional Representation of Odors.

Pamela Dalton1, Christopher Maute, Akiko Oshida, Satoshi Hikichi, Yu Izumi.   

Abstract

The mental representation elicited by smelling an odor often consists of multiple sensory and affective dimensions, yet, the richness of this elaboration is difficult to capture using methods to rate the intensity of these factors in isolation. Attempts to use language descriptors for olfactory experience have also been shown to be rather limited; among non-specialists, there is no universally accepted system for describing odors, leading to greater reliance on specific item associations. In this study we explored the utility of semantic differential scaling for illustrating the various dimensions of olfactory experience. 300 volunteers rated thirty distinct odorants using 50 SDS adjectives. Three factors emerged from the analysis (based on 17 adjective-pairs) accounting for 53% of the variance, and corresponding to the evaluation, potency and activity dimensions identified for other stimulus types. SD scaling appears to be a viable method for identifying the multiple dimensions of mental representation evoked when smelling an odorant and may prove a useful tool for both consumer and basic research alike. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Although numerous methods of classifying odors have been developed, little agreement has been achieved on the dimensions that are useful to both basic and consumer research. The identification of a set of Semantic Differential adjectives which are relevant to olfactory experience can become a useful tool for classifying the qualitative and affective basis on which odorants differ.. In particular, the degree to which odorants evokes multi-dimensional representations from other sensory modalities (visual, auditory, somatosensory or gustatory), can be usefully applied in the arena of product development both within and across cultures.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19122880      PMCID: PMC2533099          DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2008.00167.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sens Stud        ISSN: 0887-8250            Impact factor:   2.991


  8 in total

1.  Odor memory: Review and analysis.

Authors:  R S Herz; T Engen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-09

2.  Cross-modal correspondence between vision and olfaction: the color of smells.

Authors:  A N Gilbert; R Martin; S E Kemp
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1996

3.  Are odors the best cues to memory? A cross-modal comparison of associative memory stimuli.

Authors:  R S Herz
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-11-30       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Odor intensity and color lightness are correlated sensory dimensions.

Authors:  S E Kemp; A N Gilbert
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1997

5.  Affect and memory: effects of pleasant and unpleasant odors on retrieval of happy and unhappy memories.

Authors:  H Ehrlichman; J N Halpern
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-11

6.  Associations to odors: interference, mnemonics, and verbal labeling.

Authors:  H Lawless; T Engen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1977-01

7.  Basic emotions induced by odorants: a new approach based on autonomic pattern results.

Authors:  E Vernet-Maury; O Alaoui-Ismaïli; A Dittmar; G Delhomme; J Chanel
Journal:  J Auton Nerv Syst       Date:  1999-02-15

8.  Startle reflex modulation during exposure to pleasant and unpleasant odors.

Authors:  H Ehrlichman; S Brown; J Zhu; S Warrenburg
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.016

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Effects of Pleasant Ambient Fragrances on Dental Fear: Comparing Apples and Oranges.

Authors:  Alexander Toet; Monique A M Smeets; Elly van Dijk; Davina Dijkstra; Lieke van den Reijen
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 1.833

2.  Reward is assessed in three dimensions that correspond to the semantic differential.

Authors:  John G Fennell; Roland J Baddeley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The effects of odor and body posture on perceived duration.

Authors:  Eliane Schreuder; Marco R Hoeksma; Monique A M Smeets; Gün R Semin
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Odorant Normative Data for Use in Olfactory Memory Experiments: Dimension Selection and Analysis of Individual Differences.

Authors:  Andrew G Moss; Christopher Miles; Jane V Elsley; Andrew J Johnson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-24

Review 5.  Scenting the Anosmic Cube: On the Use of Ambient Scent in the Context of the Art Gallery or Museum.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-11-20

Review 6.  Using Ambient Scent to Enhance Well-Being in the Multisensory Built Environment.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-19

7.  Crossmodal Harmony: Looking for the Meaning of Harmony Beyond Hearing.

Authors:  Charles Spence; Nicola Di Stefano
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2022-02-10

8.  Searching for perceptual similarity within, and between, the (chemical) senses.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2022-09-22

Review 9.  Scent in Motion: On the Multiple Uses of Ambient Scent in the Context of Passenger Transport.

Authors:  Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.