Literature DB >> 29396765

The evaluation of lumbar paraspinal muscle quantity and quality using the Goutallier classification and lumbar indentation value.

Koji Tamai1,2, Jessica Chen1, Michael Stone1, Anush Arakelyan3, Permsak Paholpak1,4, Hiroaki Nakamura3, Zorica Buser5, Jeffrey C Wang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The cross-sectional area and fat infiltration are accepted as standard parameters for quantitative and qualitative evaluation of muscle degeneration. However, they are time-consuming, which prevents them from being used in a clinical setting. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between lumbar muscle degeneration and spinal degenerative disorders, using lumbar indentation value (LIV) as quantitative and Goutallier classification as qualitative measures.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of kinematic magnetic resonance images (kMRI). Two-hundred and thirty patients with kMRIs taken in weight-bearing positions were selected randomly. The LIV and Goutallier classification were evaluated at L4-5. The correlation of these two parameters with patients' age, gender, lumbar lordosis (LL), range of motion, disc degeneration, disc height, and Modic change were analyzed.
RESULTS: There was no significant trend of LIV among the different grades of Goutallier classification (p = 0.943). There was a significant increase in age with higher grades of Goutallier classification (p < 0.001). In contrast, there was no correlation between LIV and age (p = 0.799). The Goutallier classification positively correlated with LL (r = 0.377) and severe disc degeneration (r = 0.249). The LIV positively correlated with LL (r = 0.476) and degenerative spondylolisthesis (r = 0.184). Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that age (p = 0.026), gender (p = 0.003), and LIV (p < 0.001) were significant predictors for patients with low LL (< 10°).
CONCLUSION: Lumbar muscle quantity and quality showed specific correlation with age and spine disorders. Additionally, LL can be predicted by the muscle quantity, but not the quality. These time-saving evaluation tools potentially accelerate the study of lumbar muscles. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Goutallier classification; Lumbar indentation value; Lumbar lordosis; Muscle degeneration; Paraspinal muscle

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29396765     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5485-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

1.  Correlation between the MRI changes in the lumbar multifidus muscles and leg pain.

Authors:  D F Kader; D Wardlaw; F W Smith
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Benjamin Ungar; Benjamin Blondel; Jacob Buchowski; Jeffrey Coe; Donald Deinlein; Christopher DeWald; Hossein Mehdian; Christopher Shaffrey; Clifford Tribus; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging.

Authors:  M T Modic; P M Steinberg; J S Ross; T J Masaryk; J R Carter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Can multi-positional magnetic resonance imaging be used to evaluate angular parameters in cervical spine? A comparison of multi-positional MRI to dynamic plain radiograph.

Authors:  Permsak Paholpak; Koji Tamai; Kyle Shoell; Kittipong Sessumpun; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Influence of age and duration of symptoms on fibre type distribution and size of the back muscles in chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  A F Mannion; L Käser; E Weber; A Rhyner; J Dvorak; M Müntener
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The relationship between tear severity, fatty infiltration, and muscle atrophy in the supraspinatus.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Barry; Drew A Lansdown; Sunny Cheung; Brian T Feeley; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 7.  The role of the lumbar multifidus in chronic low back pain: a review.

Authors:  Michael D Freeman; Mark A Woodham; Andrew W Woodham
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Quantification of intermuscular adipose tissue in the erector spinae muscle by MRI: agreement with histological evaluation.

Authors:  Andrea Rossi; Elena Zoico; Bret H Goodpaster; Anna Sepe; Vincenzo Di Francesco; Francesco Fantin; Francesca Pizzini; Francesca Corzato; Alessandra Vitali; Rocco Micciolo; Tamara B Harris; Saverio Cinti; Mauro Zamboni
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  New Predictive Index for Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle Degeneration Associated With Aging.

Authors:  Kazushi Takayama; Teruo Kita; Hiroaki Nakamura; Fumiaki Kanematsu; Toshiya Yasunami; Hideki Sakanaka; Yoshiki Yamano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration in the patients with the degenerative lumbar flat back using a digital image analysis: comparison with the normal controls.

Authors:  Jae Chul Lee; Jang-Gyu Cha; Yongdai Kim; Yon-Il Kim; Byung-Joon Shin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water-Fat MRI.

Authors:  Nico Sollmann; Noah B Bonnheim; Gabby B Joseph; Ravi Chachad; Jiamin Zhou; Zehra Akkaya; Amir M Pirmoazen; Jeannie F Bailey; Xiaojie Guo; Ann A Lazar; Thomas M Link; Aaron J Fields; Roland Krug
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 5.119

2.  The Implications of Paraspinal Muscle Atrophy in Low Back Pain, Thoracolumbar Pathology, and Clinical Outcomes After Spine Surgery: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kevin He; Jeffery Head; Nikolaos Mouchtouris; Kevin Hines; Phelan Shea; Richard Schmidt; Christian Hoelscher; Geoffrey Stricsek; James Harrop; Ashwini Sharan
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-10-09

3.  Relationships between Paraspinal Muscle and Spinopelvic Sagittal Balance in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Zhuoran Sun; Weishi Li; Zhongqiang Chen
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  The Relationship Between Endplate Pathology and Patient-reported Symptoms for Chronic Low Back Pain Depends on Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle Quality.

Authors:  Jeannie F Bailey; Aaron J Fields; Alex Ballatori; Danielle Cohen; Deeptee Jain; Dezba Coughlin; Conor O'Neill; Zachary McCormick; Misung Han; Roland Krug; Sibel Demir-Deviren; Jeffrey C Lotz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  A Nomogram for Predicting the Residual Back Pain after Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Qiujiang Li; Lin Shi; Yinbin Wang; Tao Guan; Xiaocheng Jiang; Donggeng Guo; Jinhan Lv; Lijun Cai
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.037

6.  The fatty degeneration of the lumbar erector spinae muscles affects dynamic spinal compensation ability during gait in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Kousei Miura; Hideki Kadone; Tomoyuki Asada; Masao Koda; Toru Funayama; Hiroshi Takahashi; Hiroshi Noguchi; Kentaro Mataki; Yosuke Shibao; Kosuke Sato; Fumihiko Eto; Mamoru Kono; Kenji Suzuki; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Sarcopenia, Ectopic Fat Infiltration Into the Lumbar Paravertebral Muscles, and Lumbo-Pelvic Deformity in Older Adults Undergoing Lumbar Surgery.

Authors:  Deokcheol Lee; Tomofumi Kuroki; Takuya Nagai; Keisuke Kawano; Kiyoshi Higa; Syuji Kurogi; Hideaki Hamanaka; Etsuo Chosa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.