Literature DB >> 19122091

Long-term results of cemented metal-backed glenoid components for osteoarthritis of the shoulder.

Nattapol Tammachote1, John W Sperling, Torpon Vathana, Robert H Cofield, W Scott Harmsen, Cathy D Schleck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been recent renewed interest in the use of metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. However, little information is available on the long-term results. The purpose of this study was to determine the results, the risk factors for an unsatisfactory outcome, and the failure rates of total shoulder arthroplasty with a cemented metal-backed glenoid component.
METHODS: Between 1985 and 1991, 100 total shoulder arthroplasties with Neer cemented metal-backed glenoid components were performed at our institution to treat osteoarthritis. Ninety-five shoulders were followed for a minimum of two years (mean, 10.8 years) or until the time of revision surgery. Patients were assessed with use of a modified Neer rating system at the time of the latest follow-up. Radiographs of eighty-three shoulders were assessed for the presence of glenoid erosion, glenohumeral subluxation, periprosthetic lucency, and a shift in component position.
RESULTS: Total shoulder arthroplasty with a cemented metal-backed glenoid component was significantly associated with pain relief (p < 0.001) as well as with an improvement in abduction from a mean of 92 degrees to 146 degrees (p < 0.001) and external rotation from a mean of 26 degrees to 60 degrees (p < 0.001). According to the modified Neer result-rating system, the result was excellent in forty-seven shoulders, satisfactory in twenty-seven shoulders, and unsatisfactory in twenty-one shoulders. Five patients underwent revision surgery because of component loosening (two patients), component subluxation (one patient), a fracture distal to the stem (one patient), and polyethylene wear (one patient). Glenoid periprosthetic lucency was present in sixty-nine (83%) of eighty-three shoulders at a minimum radiographic follow-up of two years.
CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study suggest that total shoulder arthroplasty with a cemented metal-backed glenoid component for the treatment of osteoarthritis is associated with pain relief and improvement in motion. However, the high rate of glenoid periprosthetic lucency is concerning and requires additional follow-up and investigation. These results are not better than those that have been reported for all-polyethylene cemented glenoid components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19122091     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  16 in total

1.  Surgical management of the biconcave (B2) glenoid.

Authors:  Kenneth W Donohue; Eric T Ricchetti; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

2.  Axillary view: arthritic glenohumeral anatomy and changes after ream and run.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Akash Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Revision surgery following total shoulder arthroplasty: analysis of 2588 shoulders over three decades (1976 to 2008).

Authors:  J A Singh; J W Sperling; R H Cofield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-11

4.  No differences in early results of a hybrid glenoid compared with a pegged implant.

Authors:  Lawrence V Gulotta; K Lauchlan Chambers; Russell F Warren; David M Dines; Edward V Craig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Periprosthetic fractures associated with primary total shoulder arthroplasty and primary humeral head replacement: a thirty-three-year study.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John Sperling; Cathy Schleck; William Harmsen; Robert Cofield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Porous metals and alternate bearing surfaces in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shannon R Carpenter; Ivan Urits; Anand M Murthi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

Review 7.  Modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: What is the evidence? A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Dimitrios Chytas; Lazaros Kostretzis; Angelos Trellopoulos; Emmanouil Brilakis; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-09-25

8.  Short-term rates of radiolucency after primary total shoulder arthroplasty using a cementless metal-backed pegged polyethylene glenoid.

Authors:  Khalid Al-Hourani; James R Smith; Mark A Crowther; Partha Sarangi; Philip A McCann
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-06

9.  New design of a cementless glenoid component in unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective medium-term analysis of 143 cases.

Authors:  D Katz; J Kany; P Valenti; P Sauzières; P Gleyze; K El Kholti
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-10-27

10.  CT scan evaluation of glenoid component fixation: a prospective study of 27 minimally cemented shoulder arthroplasties.

Authors:  A Vidil; Ph Valenti; F Guichoux; J H Barthas
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-11-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.