Literature DB >> 17142640

Development of a clinical prediction rule for guiding treatment of a subgroup of patients with neck pain: use of thoracic spine manipulation, exercise, and patient education.

Joshua A Cleland1, John D Childs, Julie M Fritz, Julie M Whitman, Sarah L Eberhart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To date, no studies have investigated the predictive validity of variables from the initial examination to identify patients with neck pain who are likely to benefit from thoracic spine thrust manipulation. The purpose of this study was to develop a clinical prediction rule (CPR) to identify patients with neck pain who are likely to experience early success from thoracic spine thrust manipulation.
SUBJECTS: This was a prospective, cohort study of patients with mechanical neck pain who were referred for physical therapy.
METHODS: Subjects underwent a standardized examination and then a series of thoracic spine thrust manipulation techniques. They were classified as having experienced a successful outcome at the second and third sessions based on their perceived recovery. Potential predictor variables were entered into a stepwise logistic regression model to determine the most accurate set of variables for prediction of treatment success.
RESULTS: Data for 78 subjects were included in the data analysis, of which 42 had a successful outcome. A CPR with 6 variables was identified. If 3 of the 6 variables (positive likelihood ratio=5.5) were present, the chance of experiencing a successful outcome improved from 54% to 86%. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: The CPR provides the ability to a priori identify patients with neck pain who are likely to experience early success with thoracic spine thrust manipulation. However, future studies are necessary to validate the rule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17142640     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20060155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  66 in total

1.  Individual expectation: an overlooked, but pertinent, factor in the treatment of individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06-30

2.  What effect can manual therapy have on a patient's pain experience?

Authors:  Mark D Bishop; Rafael Torres-Cueco; Charles W Gay; Enrique Lluch-Girbés; Jason M Beneciuk; Joel E Bialosky
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2015-09-24

3.  Safety of thrust joint manipulation in the thoracic spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emilio J Puentedura; William H O'Grady
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-07

Review 4.  Clinical prediction rules for physical therapy interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-12-18

5.  Chiropractic legal challenges to the physical therapy scope of practice: anybody else taking the ethical high ground?

Authors:  Peter A Huijbregts
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

6.  Letter to the editor.

Authors:  Eric K Robertson
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

7.  Manual physical therapy in the Netherlands: reflecting on the past and planning for the future in an international perspective.

Authors:  Rob A B Oostendorp
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

8.  Clinical prediction rules: time to sacrifice the holy cow of specificity?

Authors:  Peter Huijbregts
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

9.  Letter to the editor.

Authors:  Jack Miller
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

10.  Development of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain likely to benefit from cervical traction and exercise.

Authors:  Nicole H Raney; Evan J Petersen; Tracy A Smith; James E Cowan; Daniel G Rendeiro; Gail D Deyle; John D Childs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.