One key event in inflammatory signaling is the activation of the initiator caspase, procaspase-1. Presented here is the crystal structure of the procaspase-1 zymogen without its caspase recruitment domain solved to 2.05 A. Although the isolated domain is monomeric in solution, the protein appeared dimeric in crystals. The loop arrangements in the dimer provide insight into the first autoproteolytic events that occur during activation by oligomerization. Additionally, in contrast to other caspases, we demonstrate that autoproteolysis at the second cleavage site, Asp316, is necessary for conversion to a stable dimer in solution. Critical elements of secondary structure are revealed in the crystal structure that explain why a dimeric protein is favored after proteolysis at this aspartic acid. Dimer stabilization is concurrent with a 130-fold increase in kcat, the sole contributing kinetic factor to an activated and efficient mediator of inflammation.
One key event in inflammatory signaling is the activation of the initiator caspase, procaspase-1. Presented here is the crystal structure of the procaspase-1 zymogen without its caspase recruitment domain solved to 2.05 A. Although the isolated domain is monomeric in solution, the protein appeared dimeric in crystals. The loop arrangements in the dimer provide insight into the first autoproteolytic events that occur during activation by oligomerization. Additionally, in contrast to other caspases, we demonstrate that autoproteolysis at the second cleavage site, Asp316, is necessary for conversion to a stable dimer in solution. Critical elements of secondary structure are revealed in the crystal structure that explain why a dimeric protein is favored after proteolysis at this aspartic acid. Dimer stabilization is concurrent with a 130-fold increase in kcat, the sole contributing kinetic factor to an activated and efficient mediator of inflammation.
Caspases are a family of aspartic acid-specific cysteine proteases that are
involved in inflammation and apoptosis. This enzyme family is generally
categorized into three groups as follows: inflammatory initiators (caspases-1,
-4, and -5), apoptotic initiators (caspases-2, -8, -9, and -10), and apoptotic
effectors (caspases-3, -6, and -7). Because of its role as the protease
responsible for processing prointerleukin-1β (pro-IL2-1β)
to an active 17-kDa form, caspase-1 is a major driver of inflammation and
innate immunity
(1-3).
The enzyme also participates in the activation of prointerleukin-18 and
prointerleukin-33 (4,
5). Caspase-1 activation and
the subsequent release of IL-1β, IL-18, and IL-33 are one of the first
lines of defense against invading microbes and viruses. Excessive caspase-1
activity, however, can lead to pathologies associated with several autoimmune
and inflammatory diseases such as septic shock, inflammatory bowel disease,
familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis,
and gout
(6-8).
Caspase-1 knock-out mice have strongly supported this assertion, demonstrating
an absence of processed IL-1β and IL-18 and subsequent decreases in
production of cytokines IL-1α, IL-6, interferon-γ, and tumor
necrosis factor-α when challenged with lipopolysaccharide or
Listeria monocytogenes
(6,
9,
10). More recent studies have
established the involvement of caspase-1 in neurodegenerative disorders such
as trauma and ischemic brain injury, Huntington disease, and amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis
(7).Pathways leading to the activation of the enzyme are triggered by diverse
pathogen and damage-associated molecular patterns such as lipopolysaccharide,
flagellin, DNA, RNA, uric acid crystals, bacterial toxins, and UVB damage
(11). These patterns are often
recognized by Toll-like receptors on the cell surface or by nod-like receptors
inside the cell. After pattern recognition, intracellular events result in the
conversion of the inactive procaspase-1 zymogen to a fully processed, active
enzyme.Procaspase-1 conversion is induced by macromolecular oligomerization of the
proenzyme onto a complex called the inflammasome
(11,
12). This process is mediated
through recruitment domains in procaspase-1 and inflammasome adapter proteins
(13,
14). Upon complex formation,
locally high concentrations of the enzyme result in autoproteolysis at three
aspartic acids releasing a fully processed, active enzyme. Natural inhibitors
of caspase-1 activation include proteins like ICE-BERG, Pseudo-ICE/COP,
CARD-8, and INCA, which all act as decoys to block recruitment of procaspase-1
to the inflammasome complex
(15-19).
Oligomerization plays an important role in activation of apoptotic initiator
caspases as well, including humancaspase-8 and caspase-9 and the
Drosophila initiator-caspaseDRONC.An effort to synthetically control caspase-1 activity for therapeutic
purposes has resulted in the discovery of potent peptidomimetics that inhibit
the enzyme at the active site
(20). Typically, these
compounds rely on caspase preference for substrate with an aspartic acid-like
moiety in the P1 position, but this requirement has restricted the design of
these inhibitors to small molecules with undesirable specificity and
pharmacodynamics (7). Recent
structural studies on caspase-1 and caspase-7, however, have shown that
allosteric elements can also be targeted by small molecules as an alternative
to the active site
(21-23).
We reasoned that the zymogen activation process could likewise provide a new
structural target for therapeutic inhibitors.Only two caspase zymogen structures are known, human procaspase-7 and the
DrosophilacaspaseDRONC, an ortholog of humancaspase-9
(24-26).
These structures and concurrent studies indicate that the mechanisms of
activation differ significantly among caspases. Therefore, using a combination
of structural and biochemical methods, we sought to elucidate details of
procaspase-1 activation and to provide a basis for novel approaches to
inhibitor discovery.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Caspase Expression in Escherichia coli—Wild-type humancaspase-1 (residues 104-404 with the active-site residue Cys285
mutated to Ala) was cloned into pRSET T7 expression vector (Invitrogen) with
an N-terminal Unizyme tag (Unizyme Laboratories). The p20 (residues 121-297)
and p10 (residues 317-404) subunits were cloned into the pRSET vector without
the affinity tags as described previously
(21,
27). Active p35 was cloned
into an in-house expression vector pST239 (with supplemental rare tRNA codons
ArgU, GlyT, and Pro2) containing an N-terminal Unizyme tag. pRSET
vector constructs were expressed in BL21Star(DE3) cells co-transformed with a
rare codon plasmid pRARE2 (Novagen), and constructs using the pST239 vector
were expressed in 58F3 cells (derived from W3110 with genotype
ΔfhuA(ΔtonA) Δlon galE
rpoHts(htpRts) ΔclpP lacIq
ΔompTΔ(nmpc-fepE) ΔslyD).
BL21Star(DE3) cells were grown in Terrific Broth at 37 °C to 1.0
absorbance at A600 nm, induced with 1 mm
isopropyl 1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside, and allowed to grow
overnight. 58F3 cells were grown in phosphate-limiting media at 30 °C to
2-3 A600 nm before overnight induction with 1
mm isopropyl 1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside
(28).Purification of p35C285A—Cell pellets were resuspended in
10× volume of 50 mm Tris, pH 8, 300 mm NaCl, and 5
mm β-mercaptoethanol and homogenized with a Polytron cell
grinder followed by four passes through a microfluidizer. The lysate was
centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The
supernatant was loaded over a 5-ml HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare) and
washed with 50 mm Tris, pH 8, 300 mm NaCl, 5
mm β-mercaptoethanol. Bound protein was eluted with a 0-250
mm imidazole gradient. The p35C285A was pooled, diluted, and
passed over a 5-ml Q HP HiTrap column. The mutant p35 was recovered from the
unbound flow-through, which yielded pure protein (18 mg of soluble protein per
liter of cell culture). Unizyme was removed according to the manufacturer's
protocol, and the protein was dialyzed into 10 mm Tris, pH 7.5, 100
mm NaCl, and 5 mm DTT prior to crystallography.Purification and Refolding of Active p35—Cell pellets were
passed through a Polytron grinder and microfluidizer in 10× volume of 50
mm Tris, pH 8.0, and 1 m sodium malonate. The lysate was
centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The pellet
was solubilized in 6 m GdnHCl, 50 mm Tris, pH 8.0, with
5 mm β-mercaptoethanol using sonication. This extract was
centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. Supernatant
containing p35 was loaded over a 5-ml HisTrap HP column with 10 mm
imidazole, washed with 6 m GdnHCl, 50 mm Tris, pH 8.0,
and eluted with the addition of 250 mm imidazole. The eluted p35
protein was purified by S75 (GE Healthcare) gel filtration in 6 m
GdnHCl, 50 mm Tris, pH 8.0, and 5 mm
β-mercaptoethanol to remove p24 fragments and other contaminants.
Refolding and purification was done as described below for
(p20p10)2. The refolded protein was dialyzed into 20 mm
acetate, pH 5.0, 100 mm sodium malonate, and 5% glycerol at 4
°C. Subsequent secondary dialysis was done in 20 mm acetate pH
5.0, 30 mm malonate, and 5% glycerol.Purification and Refolding of (p20p10)—p20 and
p10 proteins were refolded at a ratio of 1:1 (2 mg each) by mixing in 50 ml of
refold buffer (50 mm HEPES, pH 8.0, 100 mm malonate, 1
m NDSB-201 (nondetergent sulfobetaine-201), 10% sucrose, and 20
mm DTT) as described previously
(27). Dialysis and
purification were done in the presence of 30 mm malonate.Analysis of p35C285A Processing and Dimerization—p35C285Ap35 was mixed with (p20p10)2 caspase-1 at a final concentration of
143 to 1 μm, respectively, in 100 mm HEPES, pH 7.5,
10% sucrose, 0.1% CHAPS, and 10 mm DTT at room temperature. Time
points (75 μl of reaction with about 400 μg protein) were centrifuged
and analyzed by SEC-MALS (Agilent 1100 high pressure liquid chromatography,
Wyatt Technologies miniDawn TriStar, and Optilab DSP). 1 μl of each spun
aliquot was also analyzed for protein by SDS-PAGE (4-20% Tris-glycine,
Invitrogen). Samples were chromatographed at 1 ml/min in 100 mm
HEPES, pH 7.5, 10% sucrose, 0.1% CHAPS, and 10 mm DTT over an S200
Superdex 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare).Autoproteolysis of Active p35—p35 was concentrated to 0.5
mg/ml using VivaSpin 0.5-ml, 5-kDa PES concentrators (Sartorius Stedim) and
buffer-exchanged with 4× volume of 100 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 10%
sucrose, 0.1% CHAPS, and 10 mm DTT at 4 °C. The protein was
brought to room temperature at 0.5 mg/ml, and time points were taken for
SDS-PAGE and enzymatic assays. Enzymatic assays were performed at room
temperature using reaction buffer (100 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 10%
sucrose, 0.1% CHAPS, and 10 mm DTT) and enzyme concentrations of 20
nm. A caspase-1 substrate titration with Ac-WEHD-AFC (MP
Biomedicals) was used to determine K values. The
irreversible inhibitor benzyloxycarbonyl-VAD-fluoromethyl ketone (not
O-methylated) (AG Scientific) was used for active-site titrations to
determine active-site concentrations. A titration of free AFC (Fluka) allowed
for calculation of kcat in moles/s.Crystallization, Data Collection, and Analysis—p35C285A
crystallized at 4 °C in hanging drops, consisting of a 1:1 ratio of
protein (14 mg/ml) to mother liquor, suspended over mother liquor (0.2
m magnesium chloride, 20% (w/v) PEG 3350). Crystals appeared after
2 weeks and grew to their final size of 75 × 75 × 25 μm in 3
weeks. For data collection, crystals were transferred to cryo-buffer
containing mother liquor with 20% (v/v) glycerol and then flash-frozen at
N2. Diffraction data were collected from a single crystal at the
advanced Light Source (Berkeley, CA) Beamline 5.0.1 to 2.05 Å resolution
and was processed using HKL2000
(29). The structure was solved
using the program PHASER (30)
and the coordinates of 1RWX
(31); the model was completed
with Coot (32) and refined
using REFMAC (33). A
Ramachandaran plot using PROCHECK
(34) shows some residues in
disallowed regions, most of which are found in the poorly ordered section
between amino acids 288 and 297.
RESULTS
Caspase-1 Monomer to Dimer Conversion—To understand the
biochemical and structural details of the caspase-1 activation process, we
characterized the p35C285A mutant form of the enzyme
(Fig. 1). In contrast
to purified full-length procaspase-1, which in our hands appeared aggregated
(data not shown), the truncated mutant protein could be purified to
homogeneity. Analysis by multiple runs of size exclusion chromatography (SEC)
coupled with a multiangle laser light scatter (MALS) detection system, a
method that allows the measurement of the average molecular mass of eluting
peaks, determined that the protein was predominantly monomeric (>98%) even
at concentrations greater than 20 mg/ml (∼600 μm). To
understand what events convert the monomeric protein to a stable dimer of two
processed zymogens ((p20/p10)2), we applied a small amount of
active caspase-1 to the inactive protein p35C285A. The proteolytic patterns
observed in this experiment (Fig.
1) closely resembled those in cell lysates described
previously (35). Our results
indicate that the first proteolytic event occurs after Asp297
within the large subunit (p20). A second cleavage event then occurs at
Asp316 resulting in the loss of the linker between the p20 and p10.
The third major proteolytic event at Asp119 then releases the large
subunit from a short fragment connecting the enzyme to the CARD
(Fig. 1,
upper and middle panels). All digest time points were
analyzed by SEC-MALS, and these data show that after 4 h most of the protein
has converted to a species with a molecular mass of 60 kDa, which is expected
for the processed dimer (Fig.
1, lower panel). Analysis of protein recovery
indicates that at all time points about 400 μg of protein was recovered
except for at 24 h, where about half that (200 μg) was recovered. Cleavages
after 24 h have occurred at position Asp381 and Asp336
within the p10 subunit accounting for the loss of protein at 24 h and the
change in retention time. The actual molar mass of the soluble material based
on SEC-MALS analysis is about 45 kDa indicating the loss of a p10 subunit.
FIGURE 1.
Monomer to dimer conversion of caspase-1 zymogen. A,
diagram of p35 expressed in E. coli showing common digestion
products. B, SDS-PAGE separation of time points for p35 C285A
digested with a small amount of active enzyme (upper panel). The gel
was analyzed by densitometry and reported as relative band intensities
(middle panel). SEC-MALS analysis of 400 μg of protein is shown
from each time point (bottom panel). C, p35 with an intact
active-site cysteine was incubated in an enzymatic reaction buffer at 0.5
mg/ml. Time points were taken for 105 min and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (upper
panel) and densitometry of the gel image (middle panel).
Enzymatic activity (nanomoles of AFC/s) for each time point was determined
with the substrate Ac-WEHD-AFC (lower panel).
Monomer to dimer conversion of caspase-1 zymogen. A,
diagram of p35 expressed in E. coli showing common digestion
products. B, SDS-PAGE separation of time points for p35C285A
digested with a small amount of active enzyme (upper panel). The gel
was analyzed by densitometry and reported as relative band intensities
(middle panel). SEC-MALS analysis of 400 μg of protein is shown
from each time point (bottom panel). C, p35 with an intact
active-site cysteine was incubated in an enzymatic reaction buffer at 0.5
mg/ml. Time points were taken for 105 min and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (upper
panel) and densitometry of the gel image (middle panel).
Enzymatic activity (nanomoles of AFC/s) for each time point was determined
with the substrate Ac-WEHD-AFC (lower panel).Autoproteolysis and Enzyme Activity—We expressed and
purified p35 with the active-site cysteine present to determine correlations
between proteolysis and enzymatic properties. After changing the buffer to
activate the enzyme, the p35 shows complete autoproteolysis over a 90-min time
period (Fig. 1). In
contrast to the linear rate of digestion observed by treating the inactive
protein with a small amount of active enzyme
(Fig. 1), the p35 had
a dramatic increase in the rate of autoproteolysis once the cleavage process
was initiated. As was seen in the digests of the inactive mutant, the order of
processing is Asp297 > Asp316 > Asp119.
Using the fluorescent substrate Ac-WEHD-AFC, we determined the kinetic
constants, kcat and K, for the
protease at intervals during the processing. The data summarized in
Table 1 show that the average
K value of the enzyme remained constant throughout the
experiment at ∼4.2 μm, which is equal to the value
calculated in other reports
(36). Active-site titrations
were done for each time point, which showed that the number of active sites in
the activity assays also remained constant with a concentration of ∼7.5
nm. Using a standard curve of free AFC, we calculated the
approximate kcat of caspase-1 to be 0.054 s-1
at time 0 min and ∼7 s-1 once fully activated. This represents
an ∼130-fold increase in kcat upon autocatalytic
processing, the only measurable change in caspase-1 kinetic properties.
Importantly, analysis of proteolysis patterns on SDS-PAGE indicated that
activity was maximal once the interchain linker was completely removed from
the small subunit (Fig.
1 and Table
1).
TABLE 1
Catalytic properties and cleavage events during the autocatalytic time
course of p35 caspase-1
Time point
Km
kcat
kcat/Km
Asp297
Asp316
Asp119
min
μm
s−1
× 105m−1s−1
% cleaved
% cleaved
% cleaved
0
3.8
0.054
0.014
3.6
0
0
15
6.2
0.064
0.043
10
0
0
30
5.3
0.103
0.020
27
0
0
45
3.0
3.900
1.30
92
79
20
60
4.0
7.340
1.80
100
96
74
75
3.9
6.720
1.70
100
95
92
90
3.9
6.880
1.80
100
95
97
105
3.3
6.560
2.00
100
95
100
Catalytic properties and cleavage events during the autocatalytic time
course of p35caspase-1Electron density for residues in the central cavity at the dimer
interface. A, surface rendering of the procaspase-1 dimer with
electron density F - F omit map for
the area modeled at 50% occupancy. The electron density is contoured at
3σ after refinement and shown in green. For better visibility
of the cavity, Arg240 has been removed from the surface rendering.
B, residues 291-298 of both chains of caspase-1 within the cavity at
the dimer interface are shown along with the F -
F omit map for the area modeled at 50% occupancy. The
electron density is shown in green contoured at 3σ. C,
stereo view of the electron density 2F -
F contoured at 1σ in the cavity at the dimer
interface. The view is oriented lengthwise down the cavity, and the top
panels show chain A and the bottom panels show chain B.Crystal Structure of p35C285A—The crystals obtained belong
to space group P1 and were diffracted to 2.05 Å; the structure was
refined to Rfactor/Rfree of 20.1/26.4%
(Table 2). Although p35 is
monomeric in solution, crystals of p35 contained protein dimers. These dimers
display the same general architecture observed in all other crystal structures
of caspases to date (37). The
presence of dimers in the context of protein crystals has been observed in
structures for the DRONC zymogen and the processed form of caspase-9, both of
which appear predominantly monomeric in solution
(24-26,
38-40).
An analysis of the surface atoms in the p35C285A structure using PISA
(41) indicates that 11.7% of
the total accessible surface area is buried at the dimer interface
highlighting the relevance of this interaction.
TABLE 2
Diffraction data
PDB code 3E4C
Space group
P1
Unit cell constants
a = 56.1 Å, b = 58.0 Å, c = 119.6
Å
α = 105.95°, β = 90.85°, γ = 92.77°
Resolution
20 to 2.05 Å (2.12 to 2.05
Å)a
Rsymb
0.058
(0.414)a
<I/σI>
11.2
(1.75)a
No. of reflections
114,926
No. of unique reflections
37,223
Completeness
97.0%
(87.4%)a
Refinement
Resolution
20 to 2.05 Å
No. of reflections
35,359
Rwork,
Rfreec
0.201, 0.264
No. of non-H atoms
4,423
B-factors
Overall
36.8 Å2
Wilson-plot derived
37.5 Å2
Atoms at 0.5 occupancy
81.2 Å2
r.m.s.d. bond length
0.012 Å
r.m.s.d. angles
1.4°
Ramachandran
plotd
86.0, 12.7, 0.8, 0.4%
Numbers in parentheses refer to the highest resolution shell.
Rsym = ∑|I -
|/∑I, where is the
average intensity of symmetry related observations of a unique reflection.
Rwork = ∑|F -
F|/∑F, where
F and F are the observed and
calculated structure factor amplitudes, respectively.
Rfree is the R-factor for a randomly selected 10%
of the reflections excluded from all refinement.
Percentage of residues in the most favored, additionally allowed,
generously allowed, and disallowed regions of a Ramachandran plot
(34).
Diffraction dataNumbers in parentheses refer to the highest resolution shell.Rsym = ∑|I -
|/∑I, where is the
average intensity of symmetry related observations of a unique reflection.Rwork = ∑|F -
F|/∑F, where
F and F are the observed and
calculated structure factor amplitudes, respectively.
Rfree is the R-factor for a randomly selected 10%
of the reflections excluded from all refinement.Percentage of residues in the most favored, additionally allowed,
generously allowed, and disallowed regions of a Ramachandran plot
(34).In the procaspase-1 structure, we initially modeled residues 126-286 and
307-404 for each monomer. In this model, the 20-residue linker
(Ser104-Ser126) connecting the CARD domain to the
caspase domain is disordered. It is therefore difficult to predict what role
the CARD domain may serve structurally within the zymogen. Interestingly, the
F - F electron density map
calculated with this model contained additional density when contoured at
3σ in the center of the dimer, near the noncrystallographic 2-fold axis
(Fig. 2). This
electron density, albeit weak and not well defined, indicates the general
position of residues 287-298. Because of the symmetric nature of the caspase
dimer, it is possible to fit the side chains of Trp294 and
Phe295 and neighboring residues of either molecule into the most
prominent features of the electron density at the center of the dimer
(Fig. 2, ). Because
of this disorder in the crystals, we modeled residues 287-298 of both
molecules with occupancies of 0.5 to indicate that in the crystals the linkers
of both molecules occupy the groove in the center of the caspase dimer with
about the same probability. Amino acids after Ser298, however, are
not defined in the electron density (residues 299-306). SDS-PAGE and
N-terminal sequencing analysis of the crystals indicate that the protein was
still intact after crystallization (supplemental Fig. S1).
FIGURE 2.
Electron density for residues in the central cavity at the dimer
interface. A, surface rendering of the procaspase-1 dimer with
electron density F - F omit map for
the area modeled at 50% occupancy. The electron density is contoured at
3σ after refinement and shown in green. For better visibility
of the cavity, Arg240 has been removed from the surface rendering.
B, residues 291-298 of both chains of caspase-1 within the cavity at
the dimer interface are shown along with the F -
F omit map for the area modeled at 50% occupancy. The
electron density is shown in green contoured at 3σ. C,
stereo view of the electron density 2F -
F contoured at 1σ in the cavity at the dimer
interface. The view is oriented lengthwise down the cavity, and the top
panels show chain A and the bottom panels show chain B.
Caspase-1 zymogen in comparison with other caspase-1 structures.
A, surface representation of p35C285A (PDB code 3E4C). The two
monomers are colored wheat and slate, and the residues
286-298 are shown as spheres with their carbons colored
green. Trp294 and Phe295 are located at the
center of the dimeric protein. B, surface rendering of the
ligand-free, active caspase-1 (PDB code 1SC1
(43)). The p20 and p10 are
colored wheat and orange, respectively, in one subunit, and
slate and dark blue in the other. The central cavity is left
unoccupied in this protein because residues 286-298 (shown as
spheres) are reoriented. A and B, Arg240
has been removed from the surface rendering for visualization of the central
cavity. C, schematic representation of the subunit on the
right shows the proximity of Asp297 to the adjacent
catalytic site (Ala285 and His237) in the zymogen
structure. D, B-factor putty (PyMol) indicates the thermal
flexibility of the structure. One active-site loop has less flexibility then
the other due to crystal packing. E, comparison of active-site loops
with or without substrate mimetic. Residues 330-347 are shown as
ribbons for the apo (ligand-free, purple, PDB code 1SC1
(43)), zymogen (blue,
PDB code 3E4C), and active, inhibitor-bound structures (red, PDB code
ICE1 (42)). The substrate
mimetic in the inhibitor-bound structure, Ac-YVAD-CHO, is colored yellow.
F, hydrophobic pocket binding allosteric inhibitors (gray
sticks, PDB code 2FQQ
(21)) and
Trp294-Phe295 (green).In this final model the two molecules are very similar to each other and
superimpose with an r.m.s.d. of 0.61 Å for 269 common C-α atoms.
Overall, the dimer of p35C285A is very similar to the structure of the active
enzyme (PDB code 1ICE) (42).
The two structures superimpose with an r.m.s.d. of 0.72 Å for 232
C-α positions. However, although the cores of both structures are
closely related, there are significant differences at the active-site loops
(residues 330-347) that are more like an apo-structure of caspase-1 without an
active-site ligand (43). The
putative N terminus of the p10 (residues 314-321) subunit, and the linker
residues (285-298) are in unique positions in procaspase-1 compared with other
structures of caspase-1 and all other caspases
(37,
43).
DISCUSSION
The crystal structure of p35C285A depicts one possible arrangement of the
intact polypeptide chains in procaspase-1 dimers at very high concentrations.
This arrangement is likely similar to what occurs during oligomerization on
inflammasomes and lends support for a mechanism of activation that occurs
through intradimer cleavage. This is observed in the C-terminal region of the
large subunit, which is positioned along the dimer interface in a cavity that
is normally unoccupied in the ligand-free form of the enzyme
(Fig. 3, ) (21,
43). The peptide chain
undergoes a sharp turn at Gly287, continues for 10 amino acids down
the dimer interface, and ends with Asp297 positioned very close to
the catalytic residue of the neighboring enzyme
(Fig. 3). This
position is close enough to the catalytic site to allow cleavage of the
peptide bond following Asp297. Normally, the aspartic acid side
chain of substrate is bound in a positively charged pocket containing
Arg179 and Arg341, but this pocket is not formed in the
zymogen structure because the putative substrate is positioned on the opposite
side of the catalytic cysteine. For proteolysis to occur here, only the
catalytic cysteine needs to reposition for hydrolysis because activity is not
absolutely dependent on the other member of the catalytic dyad,
His237 (42). The
carbonyl oxygen of Asp297, however, is within 3.5 Å of the
amidenitrogen of Arg240 and near the side chains of
Arg240 and Arg286, which could stabilize a negatively
charged transition state and behave like an oxyanion hole. After initial
cleavage at Asp297 the peptide chain may be less constrained and
thus free to exit the cavity at the dimer interface, which would allow space
for the adjacent, unprocessed chain to position the second Asp297
near the opposite catalytic cysteine. The higher degree of flexibility
observed in the active-site and Asp297 region
(Fig. 3) also
suggests flexibility that could accommodate nucleophilic attack of
Asp297 by Cys285 in this region. Alternatively, it could
be the exclusion of one linker region from the core of the protein that allows
the excluded Asp297 to be processed by yet another zymogen neighbor
by interdimer cleavage. Arguments have been made for both intradimer and
interdimer processing (44,
45), and either scenario would
explain how forced dimerization with an inflammasome could activate the
caspase-1 auto-proteolytic pathway.
FIGURE 3.
Caspase-1 zymogen in comparison with other caspase-1 structures.
A, surface representation of p35 C285A (PDB code 3E4C). The two
monomers are colored wheat and slate, and the residues
286-298 are shown as spheres with their carbons colored
green. Trp294 and Phe295 are located at the
center of the dimeric protein. B, surface rendering of the
ligand-free, active caspase-1 (PDB code 1SC1
(43)). The p20 and p10 are
colored wheat and orange, respectively, in one subunit, and
slate and dark blue in the other. The central cavity is left
unoccupied in this protein because residues 286-298 (shown as
spheres) are reoriented. A and B, Arg240
has been removed from the surface rendering for visualization of the central
cavity. C, schematic representation of the subunit on the
right shows the proximity of Asp297 to the adjacent
catalytic site (Ala285 and His237) in the zymogen
structure. D, B-factor putty (PyMol) indicates the thermal
flexibility of the structure. One active-site loop has less flexibility then
the other due to crystal packing. E, comparison of active-site loops
with or without substrate mimetic. Residues 330-347 are shown as
ribbons for the apo (ligand-free, purple, PDB code 1SC1
(43)), zymogen (blue,
PDB code 3E4C), and active, inhibitor-bound structures (red, PDB code
ICE1 (42)). The substrate
mimetic in the inhibitor-bound structure, Ac-YVAD-CHO, is colored yellow.
F, hydrophobic pocket binding allosteric inhibitors (gray
sticks, PDB code 2FQQ
(21)) and
Trp294-Phe295 (green).
Structural comparison of initiator and effector caspase zymogens.
A, procaspase-1 (PDB code 3E4C) shown as a schematic with the linker
region shown as a thick ribbon. Both aspartic acid cleavage sites
between the p20 and p10 in one monomer are shown as spheres. The
dotted line represents unresolved residues not seen in the electron
density maps. B, schematic representation of procaspase-7 (PDB code
1GQF (25)), an effector
caspase, with the interdomain linker shown as a thick ribbon. Only
the first site of processing in effector caspases is required for activation.
It is noticeable that the first cleavage site is up and away from the dimer
interface in caspase-7.Comparing caspase-1 and caspase-7 zymogens reveals an intriguing
difference, the linkers between the large and small subunits start their
association with the dimer interface at different points
(Fig. 4, ) (24,
25). This altered orientation
impacts the location of the first cleavage point in the zymogens. In
caspase-1, the first cleavage site of one monomer is buried in the dimer
interface near the adjacent catalytic cysteine, whereas in caspase-7 this
region is absent from the protein core leaving the first cleavage site
exposed. This major difference between an initiator (caspase-1) and an
effector caspase (caspase-7) explains the need for oligomerization to start
the activation process in caspase-1. Effector enzymes, like caspase-7 and
caspase-3, function as downstream components in the proteolytic cascade and do
not contain oligomerization or recruitment domains at the N termini. Their
zymogens are found dimeric in solution without catalytic activity and are
readily activated by cleavage of the interdomain site by upstream initiators
(such as caspase-8 and caspase-9). This is in contrast to caspase-1, and other
initiator caspase zymogens such as caspase-9 and DRONC, which require some
activity as zymogens to autoprocess themselves. Caspase-1, however, apparently
differs from these two initiator caspases as cleavage of the enzyme leads to
large increases in enzyme activity and dimerization. Caspase-9 and DRONC
activation have been shown to be enhanced much more by oligomerization than by
proteolysis (39,
40,
46,
47). An interpretation of our
combined structural, kinetic, and biochemical data can help explain what is
different about caspase-1 and why both dimerization and proteolysis are
important for activity.
FIGURE 4.
Structural comparison of initiator and effector caspase zymogens.
A, procaspase-1 (PDB code 3E4C) shown as a schematic with the linker
region shown as a thick ribbon. Both aspartic acid cleavage sites
between the p20 and p10 in one monomer are shown as spheres. The
dotted line represents unresolved residues not seen in the electron
density maps. B, schematic representation of procaspase-7 (PDB code
1GQF (25)), an effector
caspase, with the interdomain linker shown as a thick ribbon. Only
the first site of processing in effector caspases is required for activation.
It is noticeable that the first cleavage site is up and away from the dimer
interface in caspase-7.
The low level activity of procaspase-1 has previously been recognized in
cell lysates and is characterized kinetically in our report
(Table 1)
(35). One possibility for the
reduced activity of the zymogen could be negative allosteric regulation by the
location of the p20 C terminus. An allosteric regulatory site in this region
has previously been characterized in both caspase-1 and caspase-7
(21,
23). The tryptophan and
phenylalanine that bind in this region occupy a position similar to small
molecule-allosteric inhibitors (Fig.
3). However, despite the conserved positioning, the
small molecules are more potent because they completely inactivate the enzyme.
This may be due to the covalent bond between the small molecules and
Cys331. The added effect of this bond could be to completely block
protein rearrangement in this region that occurs during substrate binding (see
substrate-bound state in Fig.
3). The p20 C terminus, when bound at this site, is
likely to be more flexible during active-site binding. This is supported by
our kinetic analysis demonstrating that the p35 zymogen likely has the same
ability to bind substrate as the fully processed enzyme, observed as a
constant K (Table
1). Also, the ability of p35 to be completely labeled at the
active site by benzyloxycarbonyl-VAD-fluoromethyl ketone confirmed substrate
binding (supplemental Fig. S2). These combined data show that
kcat is receiving the benefit of interdomain-linker
liberation and suggest that despite the unformed substrate-binding site in the
crystal structure, caspase-1 can still efficiently bind substrate ligands
(Table 1). Thus, the p20 C
terminus and linker must affect the kcat by stabilizing
the monomer and preventing the cooperative affects of the dimer. What is it
then about the interdomain linker in procaspase-1 that imparts monomer over
dimer stability?There is little secondary structure in most of the linker region. After
close inspection of the proteolytic events that lead to dimerization, it is
clear that the first cleavage at Asp297 is not enough to increase
kcat or stabilize the dimer. This is certainly different
from the executioner caspases, where the initial proteolytic event eliminates
the constraint on the linker, which then folds back to form the active-site
binding cleft, resulting in a major increase in activity. Conversely,
activation occurs after the second cleavage at Asp316 in
procaspase-1, seen at the 4-h time point in
Fig. 1 and the 45-min
time point in Fig. 1
(summarized in Table 1).
Because the first cleavage could release the constraint on the linker, it is
at first unclear why this is not enough to yield an active enzyme. In the area
of the second cleavage, however, is the only well defined secondary structure
of the linker region, a stable α-helix
(Fig. 5). In fact, at
this site, Asp316 is situated as the penultimate residue of the
α-helix. Proteolysis here would eliminate the terminal residues of the
helix (Fig. 5).
Shortening this stretch of amino acids would destabilize the helix and in turn
allow this loop to restructure with the C-terminal region of the adjacent
large subunit into an extensive anti-parallel β-sheet. This β-sheet
occurs at both poles of the dimeric protein and has been shown to be the most
important region for dimer stabilization within caspase-1
(48). Again, this is in
contrast to executioner caspases-3 and -7, which have strong β-sheet
interaction across the central region of the dimer interface that contribute
to the solution state preference for dimerization even before proteolytic
activation.
FIGURE 5.
Key structural elements of caspase-1 dimer stabilization.
A, schematic representation of caspase-1 zymogen (left, PDB
code 3E4C) and processed ligand-free caspase-1 (right, PDB code 1SC1
(42)). The proenzyme shows a
well defined α-helix near the putative N terminus of the p10. This
element contains cleavage Site 2, which is the critical processing site for
caspase-1 activation. Once proteolysis occurs at Asp316, the newly
formed p20 C terminus and p10 N terminus are able to form anti-parallel
β-sheets in the active enzyme. The important secondary structural
elements are indicated with red circles. B, diagram of the backbone
atoms of residues 314-321. Brackets indicate backbone interactions in
the α-helix in the proenzyme structure. Two of the three hydrogen bonds
in the helix are severed upon proteolysis at Asp316, indicated with
an arrow.
Key structural elements of caspase-1 dimer stabilization.
A, schematic representation of caspase-1 zymogen (left, PDB
code 3E4C) and processed ligand-free caspase-1 (right, PDB code 1SC1
(42)). The proenzyme shows a
well defined α-helix near the putative N terminus of the p10. This
element contains cleavage Site 2, which is the critical processing site for
caspase-1 activation. Once proteolysis occurs at Asp316, the newly
formed p20 C terminus and p10 N terminus are able to form anti-parallel
β-sheets in the active enzyme. The important secondary structural
elements are indicated with red circles. B, diagram of the backbone
atoms of residues 314-321. Brackets indicate backbone interactions in
the α-helix in the proenzyme structure. Two of the three hydrogen bonds
in the helix are severed upon proteolysis at Asp316, indicated with
an arrow.In response to inflammatory signaling, the initial autoactivation of
procaspase-1 is triggered by inflammasome oligomerization. The crystal
structure provides a view of how autoactivation by intradimer proteolysis at
the first cleavage site could result from this forced oligomerization.
Proteolysis at the second site, Asp316, converts an α-helix
in the monomer to an intradimer β-sheet resulting in a stable dimer with
increased enzymatic activity. Thus, the initial instability of the caspase-1
dimer is something that must be overcome during the activation process,
i.e. a potential target for small molecules that destabilize or
prevent the formation of the dimeric form of the enzyme. This type of molecule
could eliminate the need for aspartic-acid-containing compounds that treat
disorders involving caspase-1.
Authors: S J Riedl; P Fuentes-Prior; M Renatus; N Kairies; S Krapp; R Huber; G S Salvesen; W Bode Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-12-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Marjaneh Razmara; Srinivasa M Srinivasula; Lin Wang; Jean-Luc Poyet; Brad J Geddes; Peter S DiStefano; John Bertin; Emad S Alnemri Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-01-30 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Laura C Simmons; Dorothea Reilly; Laura Klimowski; T Shantha Raju; Gloria Meng; Paul Sims; Kyu Hong; Robert L Shields; Lisa A Damico; Patricia Rancatore; Daniel G Yansura Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: M Garcia-Calvo; E P Peterson; D M Rasper; J P Vaillancourt; R Zamboni; D W Nicholson; N A Thornberry Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 15.828
Authors: Alvin Lu; Venkat Giri Magupalli; Jianbin Ruan; Qian Yin; Maninjay K Atianand; Matthijn R Vos; Gunnar F Schröder; Katherine A Fitzgerald; Hao Wu; Edward H Egelman Journal: Cell Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Márton Megyeri; Veronika Harmat; Balázs Major; Ádám Végh; Júlia Balczer; Dávid Héja; Katalin Szilágyi; Dániel Datz; Gábor Pál; Péter Závodszky; Péter Gál; József Dobó Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 5.157