| Literature DB >> 19115999 |
Malvin Torsvik1, Amanda Häggblom, Geir Egil Eide, Erich Schmutzhard, Kaare Vetvik, Andrea Sylvia Winkler.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is becoming increasingly common in sub-Saharan Africa. Autonomic dysfunction contributes to morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients. Data on autonomic dysfunction in the African population is scarce, and no reference values for standardized autonomic function tests are available. The aim of this study was to establish cut off values for five easy-to-use cardiovascular autonomic function tests that may be suitable for resource-poor settings.Entities:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19115999 PMCID: PMC2646733 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6823-8-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Endocr Disord ISSN: 1472-6823 Impact factor: 2.763
Blood pressure and heart rate at rest by gender, age, and ethnic affiliation in 276 healthy participants.
| Category | SBP (mmHg) | DBP (mmHg) | HR (bpm) | |
| Mean (SD) | ||||
| Gender | Male ( | 125 (12) | 76 (7) | 65 (12) |
| Female ( | 118 (12) | 74 (8) | 70 (13) | |
| <0.001 | 0.038 | 0.001 | ||
| Age groups | 20–29 years | 125 (12) | 74 (7) | 67 (11) |
| 30–39 years | 123 (11) | 76 (7) | 66 (13) | |
| 40–49 years | 119 (11) | 74 (7) | 65 (12) | |
| 50–59 years | 119 (14) | 76 (9) | 70 (12) | |
| 60+ years | 125 (17) | 76 (9) | 71 (16) | |
| 0.039 | 0.074 | 0.190 | ||
| Ethnic affiliation | South Cushitic | 121 (12) | 74 (7) | 67 (13) |
| Nilotic | 119 (12) | 74 (8) | 68 (13) | |
| Bantoid | 131 (13) | 79 (7) | 67 (13) | |
| Other | 129 (14) | 72 (16) | 66 (12) | |
| < 0.001 | 0.011 | 0.989 | ||
Age- and gender-specific mean and median values for autonomic function tests in 276 healthy participants.
| Variable | Category | Resting HR (bpm) | HR variation to deep breathing (bpm) | HR response to standing (bpm) | Postural change in SBP (mmHg) | Postural change in DBP (mmHg) |
| Mean (SD) | ||||||
| Age groups (years) | 20–29 | 67 (11) | 23 (7) | 26 (8) | -3 (7) | 8 (7) |
| 30–39 | 66 (13) | 19 (6) | 24 (9) | -3 (7) | 9 (7) | |
| 40–49 | 66 (12) | 18 (6) | 24 (9) | -2 (7) | 10 (6) | |
| 50–59 | 70 (13) | 15 (5) | 22 (7) | -4 (8) | 9 (7) | |
| 60+ | 71 (13) | 15 (6) | 19 (8) | -6 (11) | 7 (7) | |
| 0.190 | < 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.116 | 0.225 | ||
| Gender | Men | 65 (12) | 20 (7) | 24 (8) | -3 (8) | 10 (7) |
| Women | 70 (13) | 18 (6) | 23 (9) | -4(8) | 7 (7) | |
| 0.001 | 0.033 | 0.244 | 0.187 | 0.001 | ||
| All ages ( | 67 (13) | 19 (7) | 24 (9) | -3 (8) | 9 (7) | |
Figure 1HR variation in response to deep breathing and HR response to standing showed a significant decrease with age (a) (ρ = -0.427, .
Figure 2Resting HR showed no association with (a) age (ρ = 0.047), but was significantly associated with (b) gender (.
Figure 3Mean systolic BP (stars) decreased with standing in all age groups, but with no association with (a) age (ρ = -0.026, continuous line) or (b) gender (shaded bars). Mean diastolic BP (circles) increased with standing in all age groups, but with no significant association with age (ρ = -0.010, dotted line) (a), whereas we found a significant difference for gender (b) (p = 0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test, hatched bars).
Cut-off values for cardiovascular autonomic tests based on ≥ 95th or ≥ 5th percentile.
| Variable | Category | Resting HR (bpm) | HR in response to deep breathing (bpm) | HR in response to standing (bpm) | Fall in postural SBP (mmHg) | Fall in postural DBP (mmHg) |
| Age groups (years) | 20–29 | ≤ 13 | ≤ 14 | ≥ 17b | ||
| 30–39 | ≤ 11 | ≤ 11a | ||||
| 40–49 | ≤ 9 | |||||
| 50–59 | ≤ 8 | |||||
| 60+ | ≤ 7 | |||||
| Gender | Men | ≥ 89 | ≥ 2 | |||
| Women | ≥ 97 | ≥ 5 |
The 95th percentile cut-off value applies to resting HR and postural changes in SBP and DBP.
The 5th percentile applies to HR variation in response to deep breathing and to standing.
aThis cut-off value applies to age groups of 30+ years.
bThis cut-off value applies to all age groups.
Comparison of autonomic function tests results of the current study with those of previous studies in Caucasians.
| Age groups (years) | Autonomic function test | |||
| HR variation to deep breathing (bpm) | ||||
| Current study | Mathias and Bannister [ | Ewing et al. [ | ||
| 20–29 | 23 (7) | 20 (2) | < 0.001 | |
| 30–39 | 19 (6) | 19 (3) | 0.690 | |
| 40–49 | 18 (6) | 15 (2) | 0.001 | |
| 50–59 | 15 (5) | 17 (2) | 0.056 | |
| 60–69 | 14 (4) | 12 (1) | 0.065 | |
| 70+ | 15 (7) | 9 (1) | < 0.001 | |
| All ages | 19 (7) | 31 (9) | < 0.001 | |
| HR response to standing (bpm) | ||||
| Current study | Mackay et al. [ | |||
| All ages | 24 (9) | 27 (8) | < 0.001 | |
| Postural change in SBP (mmHg) | ||||
| Current study | Ziegler et al. [ | Ewing et al. [ | ||
| All ages | -3 (8) | -10 (8) | -1 (8) | < 0.001a |
| Postural change in DBP (mmHg) | ||||
| Current study | Ziegler et al. [ | |||
| All ages | 9 (7) | -2 (6) | < 0.001 | |
aThe p-value applies to both comparative studies.