Literature DB >> 19113835

Exploring the molecular design of protein interaction sites with molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations.

Shide Liang1, Liwei Li, Wei-Lun Hsu, Meaghan N Pilcher, Vladimir Uversky, Yaoqi Zhou, A Keith Dunker, Samy O Meroueh.   

Abstract

The significant work that has been invested toward understanding protein-protein interaction has not translated into significant advances in structure-based predictions. In particular redesigning protein surfaces to bind to unrelated receptors remains a challenge, partly due to receptor flexibility, which is often neglected in these efforts. In this work, we computationally graft the binding epitope of various small proteins obtained from the RCSB database to bind to barnase, lysozyme, and trypsin using a previously derived and validated algorithm. In an effort to probe the protein complexes in a realistic environment, all native and designer complexes were subjected to a total of nearly 400 ns of explicit-solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The MD data led to an unexpected observation: some of the designer complexes were highly unstable and decomposed during the trajectories. In contrast, the native and a number of designer complexes remained consistently stable. The unstable conformers provided us with a unique opportunity to define the structural and energetic factors that lead to unproductive protein-protein complexes. To that end we used free energy calculations following the MMn class="Chemical">-PBSA approach to determine the role of nonpolar effects, electrostatics and entropy in binding. Remarkably, we found that a majority of unstable complexes exhibited more favorable electrostatics than native or stable designer complexes, suggesting that favorable electrostatic interactions are not prerequisite for complex formation between proteins. However, nonpolar effects remained consistently more favorable in native and stable designer complexes reinforcing the importance of hydrophobic effects in protein-protein binding. While entropy systematically opposed binding in all cases, there was no observed trend in the entropy difference between native and designer complexes. A series of alanine scanning mutations of hot-spot residues at the interface of native and designer complexes showed less than optimal contacts of hot-spot residues with their surroundings in the unstable conformers, resulting in more favorable entropy for these complexes. Finally, disorder predictions revealed that secondary structures at the interface of unstable complexes exhibited greater disorder than the stable complexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19113835      PMCID: PMC2754190          DOI: 10.1021/bi8017043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  61 in total

Review 1.  Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  F B Sheinerman; R Norel; B Honig
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Grafting of protein-protein interaction epitope.

Authors:  S Liang; W Li; L Xiao; J Wang; L Lai
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  2000-04

3.  Rational engineering of a miniprotein that reproduces the core of the CD4 site interacting with HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein.

Authors:  C Vita; E Drakopoulou; J Vizzavona; S Rochette; L Martin; A Ménez; C Roumestand; Y S Yang; L Ylisastigui; A Benjouad; J C Gluckman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Principles of protein-protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact?

Authors:  Ozlem Keskin; Attila Gursoy; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Optimization of electrostatic interactions in protein-protein complexes.

Authors:  Kelly Brock; Kemper Talley; Kacey Coley; Petras Kundrotas; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Characterization of protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Changhui Yan; Feihong Wu; Robert L Jernigan; Drena Dobbs; Vasant Honavar
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 7.  Recognition-induced conformational changes in protein-protein docking.

Authors:  M F Lensink; R Méndez
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.837

8.  On the contribution of water-mediated interactions to protein-complex stability.

Authors:  Dana Reichmann; Yael Phillip; Asaf Carmi; Gideon Schreiber
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes.

Authors:  Lin Jiang; Eric A Althoff; Fernando R Clemente; Lindsey Doyle; Daniela Röthlisberger; Alexandre Zanghellini; Jasmine L Gallaher; Jamie L Betker; Fujie Tanaka; Carlos F Barbas; Donald Hilvert; Kendall N Houk; Barry L Stoddard; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  A simple reference state makes a significant improvement in near-native selections from structurally refined docking decoys.

Authors:  Shide Liang; Song Liu; Chi Zhang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-11-01
View more
  17 in total

1.  Charge density distributions derived from smoothed electrostatic potential functions: design of protein reduced point charge models.

Authors:  Laurence Leherte; Daniel P Vercauteren
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Targeting multiple conformations leads to small molecule inhibitors of the uPAR·uPA protein-protein interaction that block cancer cell invasion.

Authors:  May Khanna; Fang Wang; Inha Jo; W Eric Knabe; Sarah M Wilson; Liwei Li; Khuchtumur Bum-Erdene; Jing Li; George W Sledge; Rajesh Khanna; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 3.  Energy functions in de novo protein design: current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Zhixiu Li; Yuedong Yang; Jian Zhan; Liang Dai; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

4.  Human cancer protein-protein interaction network: a structural perspective.

Authors:  Gozde Kar; Attila Gursoy; Ozlem Keskin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Investigation of the interaction between the large and small subunits of potato ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase.

Authors:  Ibrahim Baris; Aytug Tuncel; Natali Ozber; Ozlem Keskin; Ibrahim Halil Kavakli
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  RosettaBackrub--a web server for flexible backbone protein structure modeling and design.

Authors:  Florian Lauck; Colin A Smith; Gregory F Friedland; Elisabeth L Humphris; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The DynaMine webserver: predicting protein dynamics from sequence.

Authors:  Elisa Cilia; Rita Pancsa; Peter Tompa; Tom Lenaerts; Wim F Vranken
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Multifarious roles of intrinsic disorder in proteins illustrate its broad impact on plant biology.

Authors:  Xiaolin Sun; Erik H A Rikkerink; William T Jones; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  A correspondence between solution-state dynamics of an individual protein and the sequence and conformational diversity of its family.

Authors:  Gregory D Friedland; Nils-Alexander Lakomek; Christian Griesinger; Jens Meiler; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  BioDrugScreen: a computational drug design resource for ranking molecules docked to the human proteome.

Authors:  Liwei Li; Khuchtumur Bum-Erdene; Peter H Baenziger; Joshua J Rosen; Jamison R Hemmert; Joy A Nellis; Marlon E Pierce; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.