Literature DB >> 18393864

Recognition-induced conformational changes in protein-protein docking.

M F Lensink1, R Méndez.   

Abstract

The ability to predict the three-dimensional structure of a protein complex starting from the isolated binding partners is becoming increasingly relevant. As our understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind protein-protein binding improves, so do the docking methods, however, it remains a challenge to adequately predict the unbound to bound transition. Side-chain flexibility is routinely handled and most docking methods allow for a certain degree of backbone flexibility, but systems undergoing moderate to large conformational changes can at present not correctly be modeled. The docking community is therefore putting an increased effort in the treatment of protein flexibility. Here we present a survey of the existing computational techniques to model protein flexibility in the context of protein-protein docking.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18393864     DOI: 10.2174/138920108783955173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol        ISSN: 1389-2010            Impact factor:   2.837


  9 in total

1.  Exploring the molecular design of protein interaction sites with molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations.

Authors:  Shide Liang; Liwei Li; Wei-Lun Hsu; Meaghan N Pilcher; Vladimir Uversky; Yaoqi Zhou; A Keith Dunker; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Sequence and structural features of binding site residues in protein-protein complexes: comparison with protein-nucleic acid complexes.

Authors:  M Michael Gromiha; N Saranya; S Selvaraj; B Jayaram; Kazuhiko Fukui
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  CCProf: exploring conformational change profile of proteins.

Authors:  Che-Wei Chang; Chai-Wei Chou; Darby Tien-Hao Chang
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 4.  Protein flexibility in the light of structural alphabets.

Authors:  Pierrick Craveur; Agnel P Joseph; Jeremy Esque; Tarun J Narwani; Floriane Noël; Nicolas Shinada; Matthieu Goguet; Sylvain Leonard; Pierre Poulain; Olivier Bertrand; Guilhem Faure; Joseph Rebehmed; Amine Ghozlane; Lakshmipuram S Swapna; Ramachandra M Bhaskara; Jonathan Barnoud; Stéphane Téletchéa; Vincent Jallu; Jiri Cerny; Bohdan Schneider; Catherine Etchebest; Narayanaswamy Srinivasan; Jean-Christophe Gelly; Alexandre G de Brevern
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2015-05-27

Review 5.  Molecular docking as a popular tool in drug design, an in silico travel.

Authors:  Jerome de Ruyck; Guillaume Brysbaert; Ralf Blossey; Marc F Lensink
Journal:  Adv Appl Bioinform Chem       Date:  2016-06-28

6.  Exploring the potential of a structural alphabet-based tool for mining multiple target conformations and target flexibility insight.

Authors:  Leslie Regad; Jean-Baptiste Chéron; Dhoha Triki; Caroline Senac; Delphine Flatters; Anne-Claude Camproux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  SAFlex: A structural alphabet extension to integrate protein structural flexibility and missing data information.

Authors:  Ikram Allam; Delphine Flatters; Géraldine Caumes; Leslie Regad; Vincent Delos; Gregory Nuel; Anne-Claude Camproux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  On the electrostatic component of protein-protein binding free energy.

Authors:  Kemper Talley; Carmen Ng; Michael Shoppell; Petras Kundrotas; Emil Alexov
Journal:  PMC Biophys       Date:  2008-11-05

9.  Computational characterization of the binding mode between oncoprotein Ets-1 and DNA-repair enzymes.

Authors:  Jerome de Ruyck; Guillaume Brysbaert; Vincent Villeret; Marc Aumercier; Marc F Lensink
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2018-09-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.