Literature DB >> 19112047

Intensity changes in a continuous tone: auditory cortical potentials comparison with frequency changes.

Andrew Dimitrijevic1, Brenda Lolli, Henry J Michalewski, Hillel Pratt, Fan-Gang Zeng, Arnold Starr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine auditory cortical potentials in normal-hearing subjects to intensity increments in a continuous pure tone at low, mid, and high frequency.
METHODS: Electrical scalp potentials were recorded in response to randomly occurring 100 ms intensity increments of continuous 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz tones every 1.4 s. The magnitude of intensity change varied between 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 dB above the 80 dB SPL continuous tone.
RESULTS: Potentials included N100, P200, and a slow negative (SN) wave. N100 latencies were delayed whereas amplitudes were not affected for 250 Hz compared to 1000 and 4000 Hz. Functions relating the magnitude of the intensity change and N100 latency/amplitude did not differ in their slope among the three frequencies. No consistent relationship between intensity increment and SN was observed. Cortical dipole sources for N100 did not differ in location or orientation between the three frequencies.
CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between intensity increments and N100 latency/amplitude did not differ between tonal frequencies. A cortical tonotopic arrangement was not observed for intensity increments. Our results are in contrast to prior studies of brain activities to brief frequency changes showing cortical tonotopic organization. SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that intensity and frequency discrimination employ distinct central processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19112047     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  11 in total

1.  Auditory discrimination: the relationship between psychophysical and electrophysiological measures.

Authors:  Shuman He; John H Grose; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Auditory cortical N100 in pre- and post-synaptic auditory neuropathy to frequency or intensity changes of continuous tones.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; Arnold Starr; Shrutee Bhatt; Henry J Michalewski; Fan-Gang Zeng; Hillel Pratt
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Infant cortical electrophysiology and perception of vowel contrasts.

Authors:  Barbara K Cone
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Tone-Evoked Acoustic Change Complex (ACC) Recorded in a Sedated Animal Model.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-10

5.  Cortical imbalance following delayed restoration of bilateral hearing in deaf adolescents.

Authors:  Carly A Anderson; Sharon L Cushing; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.399

6.  Acoustic change responses to amplitude modulation: a method to quantify cortical temporal processing and hemispheric asymmetry.

Authors:  Ji Hye Han; Andrew Dimitrijevic
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Brain Network Connectivity During Language Comprehension: Interacting Linguistic and Perceptual Subsystems.

Authors:  Elisabeth Fonteneau; Mirjana Bozic; William D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Acoustic Change Responses to Amplitude Modulation in Cochlear Implant Users: Relationships to Speech Perception.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Han; Andrew Dimitrijevic
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Musical and Prosodic Phrasing: Shared Processing Mechanisms and Effects of Musical Expertise.

Authors:  Anastasia Glushko; Karsten Steinhauer; John DePriest; Stefan Koelsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Acoustic Change Complex: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Jae-Ryong Kim
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2015-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.