Literature DB >> 19109514

Defining and classifying cancer cachexia: a proposal by the SCRINIO Working Group.

Federico Bozzetti1, Luigi Mariani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although cancer cachexia is widely diffuse in the cancer patient population, there is no objective definition and classification of this syndrome. The purpose of this study is to propose a simple and quick classification that relies on the severity of the body weight loss and presence/absence of symptoms that are associated with cancer cachexia.
METHODS: The authors used a database of an ongoing multicenter prospective investigation on the screening of the nutrition risk of 1307 cancer outpatients from different (mainly Italian) university or scientific institutes or hospitals. The database included demographic, oncologic, clinical, and nutrition data. The patients were divided into 4 classes based on combinations of body weight loss (< 10%, precachexia; > or = 10%, cachexia) and the presence/absence of at least 1 symptom of anorexia, fatigue, or early satiation. The authors verified statistically whether these 4 classes were associated with the distribution of main clinical, nutrition, and oncologic variables, after adjustment for treatment status, by using the Cochrane-Mantel-Hanszel test for count data and ANOVA for continuous data.
RESULTS: Moving from "asymptomatic precachexia" (class 1) to "symptomatic cachexia" (class 4), there were statistically significant trends (P < .0001) in the percentage of gastrointestinal vs nongastrointestinal tumors, severity of cancer stage, percentage of weight loss, number of symptoms per patient, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and nutritional risk score.
CONCLUSIONS: The statistical analysis has validated the classification by identifying stages with different severity of cachexia. This classification could be adopted within a comprehensive oncologic approach to the weight-losing patients, until more specific diagnostic techniques are available in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19109514     DOI: 10.1177/0148607108325076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  37 in total

1.  More is better: a multimodality approach to cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Egidio Del Fabbro
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-02-04

Review 2.  Research priorities in cancer cachexia: The University of Rochester Cancer Center NCI Community Oncology Research Program Research Base Symposium on Cancer Cachexia and Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Richard F Dunne; Karen M Mustian; Jose M Garcia; William Dale; Reid Hayward; Breton Roussel; Mary M Buschmann; Bette J Caan; Calvin L Cole; Fergal J Fleming; Joe V Chakkalakal; David C Linehan; Aram F Hezel; Supriya G Mohile
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.302

3.  Acute impact of home parenteral nutrition in patients with late-stage cancer on family caregivers: preliminary data.

Authors:  Lidia Santarpia; Federico Bozzetti
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Cancer cachexia: understanding the molecular basis.

Authors:  Josep M Argilés; Sílvia Busquets; Britta Stemmler; Francisco J López-Soriano
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Weight loss in cancer patients: a plea for a better awareness of the issue.

Authors:  Luigi Mariani; Salvatore Lo Vullo; Federico Bozzetti
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Genetic basis of interindividual susceptibility to cancer cachexia: selection of potential candidate gene polymorphisms for association studies.

Authors:  N Johns; B H Tan; M MacMillan; T S Solheim; J A Ross; V E Baracos; S Damaraju; K C H Fearon
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  The cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: myth or reality?

Authors:  Wael Lasheen; Declan Walsh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Diagnostic criteria of cancer cachexia: relation to quality of life, exercise capacity and survival in unselected palliative care patients.

Authors:  Ola Wallengren; Kent Lundholm; Ingvar Bosaeus
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Evolving classification systems for cancer cachexia: ready for clinical practice?

Authors:  David Blum; Aurelius Omlin; Ken Fearon; Vickie Baracos; Lukas Radbruch; Stein Kaasa; Florian Strasser
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  The nutritional risk in oncology: a study of 1,453 cancer outpatients.

Authors:  Federico Bozzetti; Luigi Mariani; Salvatore Lo Vullo; Maria Luisa Amerio; Roberto Biffi; Giovanni Caccialanza; Giorgio Capuano; Giovanni Capuano; Isabel Correja; Luca Cozzaglio; Angelo Di Leo; Leonardo Di Cosmo; Concetta Finocchiaro; Cecilia Gavazzi; Antonello Giannoni; Patrizia Magnanini; Giovanni Mantovani; Manuela Pellegrini; Lidia Rovera; Giancarlo Sandri; Marco Tinivella; Enrico Vigevani
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.