Literature DB >> 19107441

Mammographic density: a heritable risk factor for breast cancer.

Norman F Boyd1, Lisa J Martin, Johanna M Rommens, Andrew D Paterson, Salomon Minkin, Martin J Yaffe, Jennifer Stone, John L Hopper.   

Abstract

The appearance of the breast on mammography varies among women, reflecting variations in tissue composition. Stroma and epithelium attenuate x-rays more than fat and appear light on a mammogram, which we refer to here as " mammographic density, " while fat appears dark. We show evidence that mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, and that risk of breast cancer is four to five times greater in women with density in more than 75% of the breast, compared with those with little or no density. Density in more than 50% of the breast may account for a large proportion of breast cancers. Density is influenced by age, parity, body mass index, and menopause but these factors account for only 20 - 30% of the variation in density in the population. Twin studies have shown that percent mammographic density, at a given age, is highly heritable, and that inherited factors explain 63% of the variance. Mammographic density has the characteristics of a quantitative trait, and may be influenced by genes that are easier to identify than those associated with breast cancer itself. The genes that influence mammographic density may also be associated with risk of breast cancer, and their identification is also likely to provide insights into the biology of the breast, and to identify potential targets for preventive strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19107441     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-492-0_15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  43 in total

Review 1.  Microenvironmental control of the breast cancer cell cycle.

Authors:  Xun Guo; Yuehan Wu; Helen J Hathaway; Rebecca S Hartley
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Automatic classification of mammography reports by BI-RADS breast tissue composition class.

Authors:  Bethany Percha; Houssam Nassif; Jafi Lipson; Elizabeth Burnside; Daniel Rubin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Mammary gland ECM remodeling, stiffness, and mechanosignaling in normal development and tumor progression.

Authors:  Pepper Schedin; Patricia J Keely
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Differences in DNA methylation by extent of breast cancer family history in unaffected women.

Authors:  Lissette Delgado-Cruzata; Hui-Chen Wu; Yuyan Liao; Regina M Santella; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.528

5.  Impact of skin removal on quantitative measurement of breast density using MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Daniel Chang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Tzu-Ching Shih; Chieh-Chih Hsu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  How does semi-automated computer-derived CT measure of breast density compare with subjective assessments to assess mean glandular breast density, in patients with breast cancer?

Authors:  G J Bansal; S Kotugodella
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Molecular mechanisms of the preventable causes of cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Erica A Golemis; Paul Scheet; Tim N Beck; Eward M Scolnick; David J Hunter; Ernest Hawk; Nancy Hopkins
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Stiff stroma increases breast cancer risk by inducing the oncogene ZNF217.

Authors:  Jason J Northey; Alexander S Barrett; Irene Acerbi; Mary-Kate Hayward; Stephanie Talamantes; Ivory S Dean; Janna K Mouw; Suzanne M Ponik; Jonathon N Lakins; Po-Jui Huang; Junmin Wu; Quanming Shi; Susan Samson; Patricia J Keely; Rita A Mukhtar; Jan T Liphardt; John A Shepherd; E Shelley Hwang; Yunn-Yi Chen; Kirk C Hansen; Laurie E Littlepage; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Genetic variation in the estrogen metabolic pathway and mammographic density as an intermediate phenotype of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Louise Eriksson; Keith Humphreys; Kamila Czene; Jianjun Liu; Rulla M Tamimi; Sara Lindström; David J Hunter; Celine M Vachon; Fergus J Couch; Christopher G Scott; Pagona Lagiou; Per Hall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Relationship Between Breast Density and Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators, Aromatase Inhibitors, Physical Activity, and Diet: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ernest U Ekpo; Patrick C Brennan; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.