Literature DB >> 19106680

Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancers: lessons learned from 579 cases.

Kheng-Hong Ng1, Dennis Chung-Kei Ng, Hester Yui-Shan Cheung, James Cheuk-Hoo Wong, Kevin Kwok-Kay Yau, Clift Chi-Chiu Chung, Michael Ka-Wah Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the short-term outcomes and long-term survival of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection at a single institution with 579 cases over a 15-year period. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The use of laparoscopic resection for colon cancer has been shown to be safe with comparable oncological outcomes. However, the role of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer is still controversial with few studies looking into long-term outcomes.
METHODS: From May 1992 to April 2007, 579 patients underwent laparoscopic resection for rectosigmoid and rectal cancer. The clinical data of these patients were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected database. Data evaluated includes short- and long-term results, with survival outcomes calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Over this 15-year period, 316 patients had laparoscopic anterior resection for rectosigmoid and upper rectal cancer, 152 patients had laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision, 92 patients had laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection, 17 patients had laparoscopic Hartmann procedure for rectal cancer, and 2 patients had proctocolectomy. The median age of these patients was 68 years (range, 35-95). The overall early and late operative morbidity was 18.8% and 9.7%, respectively. Conversion to open surgery was required in 5.4%of patients. Anastomotic leak rate was 3.5%. The median follow-up time was 56 months (range, 8-288). Port-site recurrence occurred in 2 patients. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 7.4% of patients after curative resection. The overall 5- and 10-year survivals for rectal cancer were 70% and 45.5%, respectively. The cancer-specific 5- and 10- year survival was 76% and 56%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study with large number of patients over a long follow-up period suggested that laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer is safe with good long-term oncological outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19106680     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818e418a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  44 in total

1.  Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery.

Authors:  Mitsugu Sekimoto; Ichiro Takemasa; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Masataka Ikeda; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Andre da Luz Moreira; Isabella Mor; Daniel P Geisler; Feza H Remzi; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Gallbladder cancer: role of laparoscopy in the management of potentially resectable tumors.

Authors:  Xabier de Aretxabala; Jorge Leon; Juan Hepp; Fernando Maluenda; Ivan Roa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Rectal cancer: the evolution of laparoscopy--what's next?

Authors:  Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Successful total shift from multiport to single-port laparoscopic surgery in low anterior resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Say-June Kim; Byung-Jo Choi; Sang Chul Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Influence of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  In Ja Park
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Apples and oranges: the low and mid versus the upper rectum.

Authors:  Martin Weiser; Leonard Saltz
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: improving outcomes.

Authors:  Christof Hottenrott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Jin-bo Jiang; Kun Jiang; Yong Dai; Ru-xia Wang; Wei-zhi Wu; Jing-jing Wang; Fu-Bo Xie; Xue-Mei Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Short-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus conventional total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer in a large teaching hospital.

Authors:  A H W Schiphorst; A Doeksen; M E Hamaker; D D E Zimmerman; A Pronk
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.