Literature DB >> 19106672

Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients.

Elisabeth R Garwood1, Dan Moore, Cheryl Ewing, E Shelley Hwang, Michael Alvarado, Robert D Foster, Laura J Esserman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dissemination of the total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM) technique is limited by concerns of nipple viability, flap necrosis, local recurrence risk, and the technical challenge of this procedure. We sought to define the impact of surgical and reconstructive variables on complication rates and assess how changes in technique affect outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared the outcomes of TSSM in 2 cohorts of patients. Cohort 1: the first 64 TSSM procedures performed at our institution, between 2001 and 2005. Cohort 2: 106 TSSM performed between 2005 and 2007. Outcomes of cohort 1 were analyzed in 2005. At that time, potential risk factors for complications were identified, and efforts to minimize these risks by altering operative and reconstructive technique were then applied to patients in cohort 2. The impact of these changes on outcomes was assessed. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between predictor variables and adverse outcomes (Stata 10).
RESULTS: The predominant incision type in cohort 2 involved less than a third of the nipple areola complex (NAC), and the most frequent reconstruction technique was tissue expander placement. Between cohort 1 and cohort 2, nipple survival rates rose from 80% to 95% (P = 0.003) and complication rates declined: necrotic complications (30% --> 13%; P = 0.01), implant loss (31% --> 10%; P = 0.005), skin flap necrosis (16%-11%; not significant), and significant infections (17%-9%, not significant). Incisions involving >30% of the NAC (P < 0.001) and reconstruction with autologous tissue (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for necrotic complications. The local recurrence rate was 0.6% at a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 1-65), with no recurrences in the NAC.
CONCLUSION: Focused improvement in technique has resulted in the development of TSSM as a successful intervention at our institution that is oncologically safe with high nipple viability and early low rates of recurrence. Identifying factors that contribute to complications and changing surgical and reconstructive techniques to eliminate risk factors has greatly improved outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19106672     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818e41a7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  51 in total

1.  Update on breast reconstruction techniques and indications.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Mario Rietjens; Visnu Lohsiriwat; Piercarlo Rey; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Stefano Martella; Andrea Manconi; Benedetta Barbieri; Krishna B Clough
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Anatomy relevant to conservative mastectomy.

Authors:  Rachel L O'Connell; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?

Authors:  Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

4.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Incisions for Cancer Extirpation Prospective Cohort Trial: Perfusion, Complications, and Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Odom; Rajiv P Parikh; Grace Um; Simone W Kantola; Amy E Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Surgical site infection after breast surgery: impact of 2010 CDC reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Amy C Degnim; Alyssa D Throckmorton; Sarah Y Boostrom; Judy C Boughey; Andrea Holifield; Larry M Baddour; Tanya L Hoskin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Quantitative assessment of nipple perfusion with near-infrared fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Yoshitomo Ashitate; Bernard T Lee; Long H Ngo; Rita G Laurence; Merlijn Hutteman; Rafiou Oketokoun; Elaine Lunsford; Hak Soo Choi; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Nipple-sparing mastectomies: Clinical outcomes from a single academic institution.

Authors:  Barbara Dull; Leah Conant; Terence Myckatyn; Marissa Tenenbaum; Amy Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-04

Review 8.  Recent advances in the surgical care of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Alessandra Mascaro; Massimo Farina; Raffaella Gigli; Carlo E Vitelli; Lucio Fortunato
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Randomized trial of drain antisepsis after mastectomy and immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Amy C Degnim; Tanya L Hoskin; Rushin D Brahmbhatt; Anne Warren-Peled; Margie Loprinzi; Emily S Pavey; Judy C Boughey; Tina J Hieken; Steven Jacobson; Valerie Lemaine; James W Jakub; Chetan Irwin; Robert D Foster; Hani Sbitany; Michel Saint-Cyr; Erin Duralde; Sheri Ramaker; Robin Chin; Monica Sieg; Melissa Wildeman; Jeffrey S Scow; Robin Patel; Karla Ballman; Larry M Baddour; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Prediction of post-operative necrosis after mastectomy: a pilot study utilizing optical diffusion imaging spectroscopy.

Authors:  Roshni Rao; Michel Saint-Cyr; Aye Moe Thu Ma; Monet Bowling; Daniel A Hatef; Valerie Andrews; Xian-Jin Xie; Theresa Zogakis; Rod Rohrich
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.