Literature DB >> 19104875

Data ranges in aquatic toxicity of chemicals: Consequences for environmental risk analysis.

G Koller1, K Hungerbühler, K Fent.   

Abstract

A significant problem for effect assessment of aquatic ecosystems arises from the large ranges of toxicity data, which can be found in different databases and literature. Here, ranges are given for the aquatic toxicity of 27 high production volume chemicals. Based on these illustrative examples and on the current literature on uncertainty in aquatic effect assessment, toxicity ranges are discussed for their possible causes (variation in experimental condition, species, endpoint, time) and ways to handle them (safety factors). Implications and recommendations on the procedure of risk analysis of chemical substances are drawn. Two main requirements for a comprehensive risk assessment are identified, which often play a minor role in current practice (as they are often neglected) as well as in scientific discussion (as they are meant to be trivial). First, data quality must be checked critically before applying any result of a toxicity test. Secondly, experimental data should take into account different species and acute as well as chronic data. If these aspects are considered in risk analysis, which is common practice in ecotoxicology but not always in the context of practical applications in risk engineering, a more comprehensive picture of the environmental toxicity of a chemical substance can be obtained.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 19104875     DOI: 10.1065/espr199911.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  3 in total

1.  Improving the quality of statistics in regulatory ecotoxicity tests.

Authors:  P F Chapman; M Crane; J Wiles; F Noppert; E McIndoe
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  A probabilistic framework for the reference dose (probabilistic RfD).

Authors:  J C Swartout; P S Price; M L Dourson; H L Carlson-Lynch; R E Keenan
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Derivation of acceptable concentrations for the protection of aquatic organisms.

Authors:  J K Fawell; S Hedgecott
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 4.860

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Probabilistic approaches in the effect assessment of toxic chemicals. What are the benefits and limitations?

Authors:  Martin Scheringer; Dirk Steinbach; Beate Escher; Konrad Hungerbühler
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.