Literature DB >> 19104300

The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: results using an intramedullary nail with integrated cephalocervical screws and linear compression.

Andreas H Ruecker1, M Rupprecht, M Gruber, M Gebauer, F Barvencik, D Briem, J M Rueger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A new device for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures that uses 2 cephalocervical screws in an integrated mechanism allowing linear intraoperative compression and rotational stability of the head/neck fragment has been developed. The aim of this study was to describe the results using this device for the treatment of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
DESIGN: Prospective, consecutive.
SETTING: Academic Trauma Center.
METHODS: Between March 1, 2005, and July 31, 2006, 100 consecutive patients with an intertrochanteric fracture were treated with a new trochanteric antegrade nail (InterTan; Smith-Nephew, Memphis, TN). All living patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year postoperatively (range 12-27 months). Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed until healing and at the 1-year anniversary of the index procedure. Healing, pain with ambulation, return to activities of daily living, the modified Harris hip score, and Barthel Index were used to evaluate outcomes.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 81.2 (+/-11.3) years. Thirty-seven patients died, 12 were too infirmed for follow-up, and 3 could not be located, leaving 48 patients available for final evaluation. The average surgical time was 41 minutes (13-95 minutes). This rose significantly with the complexity of the fracture (OTA/AO classification: A1 versus A3, P = 0.016). All fractures healed within 16 weeks (range 10-16 weeks). Radiographic analysis at healing revealed no loss of reduction, no uncontrolled collapse of the neck, no nonunions, no femoral shaft fractures, and no implant failures. Two cases in the series were poorly reduced and settled into varus malalignment. There was no varus malposition seen in the remaining 46 fractures. The mean prefracture Harris hip score (75.1 +/- 13.4) was significantly reduced at the time of follow-up (70.3 +/- 14.5, P = 0.003); 58% of the patients recovered their prefracture status. No significant difference was seen for the Barthel Index.
CONCLUSIONS: The InterTan device appears to be a reliable implant for the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Its design provides for stability against rotation and minimizes neck malunions (shortening) through linear intraoperative compression of the head/neck segment to the shaft. As a result of the negligible complication rate and improved clinical outcomes, this implant is now the standard treatment for all intertrochanteric fractures at our institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19104300     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819211b2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  34 in total

1.  Comparative study of InterTAN and Dynamic Hip Screw in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric injury and wound.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Xin Yang; Hua-Zheng He; Li-Jun Dong; De-Gang Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

2.  Internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with posterior comminution: a biomechanical comparison of DHS® and Intertan nail®.

Authors:  Martin Rupprecht; Lars Grossterlinden; Kai Sellenschloh; Michael Hoffmann; Klaus Püschel; Michael Morlock; Johannes M Rueger; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Early experience about Anteversa(®) plate for lateral femur fractures.

Authors:  Enrico Bonicoli; Lorenzo Andreani; Nicola Piolanti; Lorenzo Dolfi; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2012-12-20

4.  3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre.

Authors:  Alicja J Bojan; Claudia Beimel; Andreas Speitling; Gilbert Taglang; Carl Ekholm; Anders Jönsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yanfeng Huang; Chunlin Zhang; Yi Luo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Effect of varus and valgus alignment on implant loading after proximal femur fracture fixation.

Authors:  Meir Marmor; Kate Liddle; Jenni Buckley; Amir Matityahu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-04-27

7.  Comparison of Intra- and Extramedullary Implants in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Tahir Mutlu Duymus; Suavi Aydogmus; İbrahim Ulusoy; Tolga Kececi; Levent Adiyeke; Bahar Dernek; Serhat Mutlu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-04-10

8.  Is the modified Harris hip score valid and responsive instrument for outcome assessment in the Indian population with pertrochanteric fractures?

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanathan; Keyur Akbari; Amit J Patel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-03

9.  Locked plating versus cephalomedullary nailing of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Authors:  Philipp N Streubel; Michael Moustoukas; William T Obremskey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-02-26

10.  [Comparison of the predictive value of tip-apex distance and calcar referenced tip-apex distance in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures with Asian type proximal femoral nail fixation].

Authors:  Yuwei Cai; Juntao Feng; Yu Chen; Meng Shi; Zhongxiang Yu; Lei Fang; Lin Zhou; Shengming Xu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.