Literature DB >> 19103222

Evoked potential variability.

Lingli Hu1, Nash N Boutros, Ben H Jansen.   

Abstract

An unsupervised correlation-based clustering method was developed to assess the trial-to-trial variability of auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). The method first decomposes single trials into three frequency bands, each containing activity primarily associated with one of the three major AEP components, i.e., P50, N100 and P200. Next, single-trial evoked potentials with similar post-stimulus characteristics are clustered and selectively averaged to determine the presence or absence of an AEP component. The method was evaluated on actual AEP and spontaneous EEG data collected from 25 healthy participants using a paradigm in which pairs of identical tones were presented, with the first stimulus (S1) presented 0.5s before the second stimulus (S2). Homogeneous, well-separated clusters were obtained and substantial AEP variability was found. Also, there was a trend for S2 to produce fewer 'complete' (and significantly smaller) responses than S1. Tests conducted on spontaneous EEG produced similar clusters as obtained from EP data, but significantly fewer stimuli produced responses containing all three EP components than seen in AEP data. These findings suggest that the clustering method presented here performs adequately to assess trial-to-trial EP variability. Also, the results suggest that the sensory gating observed in normal controls may be caused by the fact that the second stimulus generates fewer 'responsive' trials than the first stimulus, thus resulting in smaller ensemble averages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19103222      PMCID: PMC2670772          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  39 in total

1.  [A comparison between group-average and individual evoked potential analysis].

Authors:  S Campanella; C Gomez; B Rossion; L Liard; D Debatisse; S Dubois; A Delinte; R Bruyer; M Crommelinck; J M Guérit
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.734

2.  Detection of synchronized oscillations in the electroencephalogram: an evaluation of methods.

Authors:  Nick Yeung; Rafal Bogacz; Clay B Holroyd; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations.

Authors:  Joseph Dien; Daniel J Beal; Patrick Berg
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Decomposing ERP time-frequency energy using PCA.

Authors:  Edward M Bernat; William J Williams; William J Gehring
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Single-trial evoked potential estimation: comparison between independent component analysis and wavelet denoising.

Authors:  Darshan Iyer; George Zouridakis
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Conventional and wavelet coherence applied to sensory-evoked electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Alexander Klein; Tomas Sauer; Andreas Jedynak; Wolfgang Skrandies
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  A fuzzy clustering approach to EP estimation.

Authors:  G Zouridakis; B H Jansen; N N Boutros
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Analysis of phase-locking is informative for studying event-related EEG activity.

Authors:  V Kolev; J Yordanova
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Auditory event-related responses are generated independently of ongoing brain activity.

Authors:  Ville Mäkinen; Hannu Tiitinen; Patrick May
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects.

Authors:  Kalanit Grill-Spector; Richard Henson; Alex Martin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  3 in total

1.  Discrimination of speech stimuli based on neuronal response phase patterns depends on acoustics but not comprehension.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Analysis of stimulus-related activity in rat auditory cortex using complex spectral coefficients.

Authors:  Bryan M Krause; Matthew I Banks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Auditory evoked potential variability in healthy and schizophrenia subjects.

Authors:  Ben H Jansen; Lingli Hu; Nash N Boutros
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.708

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.