Literature DB >> 23657279

Analysis of stimulus-related activity in rat auditory cortex using complex spectral coefficients.

Bryan M Krause1, Matthew I Banks.   

Abstract

The neural mechanisms of sensory responses recorded from the scalp or cortical surface remain controversial. Evoked vs. induced response components (i.e., changes in mean vs. variance) are associated with bottom-up vs. top-down processing, but trial-by-trial response variability can confound this interpretation. Phase reset of ongoing oscillations has also been postulated to contribute to sensory responses. In this article, we present evidence that responses under passive listening conditions are dominated by variable evoked response components. We measured the mean, variance, and phase of complex time-frequency coefficients of epidurally recorded responses to acoustic stimuli in rats. During the stimulus, changes in mean, variance, and phase tended to co-occur. After the stimulus, there was a small, low-frequency offset response in the mean and modest, prolonged desynchronization in the alpha band. Simulations showed that trial-by-trial variability in the mean can account for most of the variance and phase changes observed during the stimulus. This variability was state dependent, with smallest variability during periods of greatest arousal. Our data suggest that cortical responses to auditory stimuli reflect variable inputs to the cortical network. These analyses suggest that caution should be exercised when interpreting variance and phase changes in terms of top-down cortical processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory cortex; evoked response; induced response; phase reset; wavelet transform

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23657279      PMCID: PMC3742995          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00187.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  76 in total

Review 1.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration.

Authors:  F Varela; J P Lachaux; E Rodriguez; J Martinerie
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Reduction of information redundancy in the ascending auditory pathway.

Authors:  Gal Chechik; Michael J Anderson; Omer Bar-Yosef; Eric D Young; Naftali Tishby; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Spectrotemporal analysis of evoked and induced electroencephalographic responses in primary auditory cortex (A1) of the awake monkey.

Authors:  Mitchell Steinschneider; Yonatan I Fishman; Joseph C Arezzo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  The Visual Evoked Potential is independent of surface alpha rhythm phase.

Authors:  Michael L Risner; Christopher J Aura; James E Black; Timothy J Gawne
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Exploring event-related brain dynamics with tests on complex valued time-frequency representations.

Authors:  Eduardo Martínez-Montes; Elena R Cuspineda-Bravo; Wael El-Deredy; José M Sánchez-Bornot; Agustín Lage-Castellanos; Pedro A Valdés-Sosa
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Event-related EEG desynchronization and synchronization during an auditory memory task.

Authors:  C M Krause; A H Lang; M Laine; M Kuusisto; B Pörn
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-04

8.  Discrimination between phase-locked and non-phase-locked event-related EEG activity.

Authors:  J Kalcher; G Pfurtscheller
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-05

9.  Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human.

Authors:  C Tallon-Baudry; O Bertrand; C Delpuech; J Pernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  State-dependent variability of neuronal responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the visual cortex.

Authors:  Brian N Pasley; Elena A Allen; Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  1 in total

1.  Encoding of natural sounds by variance of the cortical local field potential.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon; Shihab A Shamma; Stephen V David
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.