Literature DB >> 19102640

Highest prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy in institutionalized women compared with noninstitutionalized women: a case-control study.

Olivier Bruyere1, Caroline Decock, Melanie Delhez, Julien Collette, Jean-Yves Reginster.   

Abstract

The reduced capacity of older skin to synthesize vitamin D(3) under the influence of ultraviolet light makes older persons at risk of vitamin D deficiency. The risk could even be increased in institutionalized persons owing to their lower sunshine exposure. It has been reported that an inadequate vitamin D level is associated with secondary hyperparathyroidism, increased bone turnover, and bone loss, which increase fracture risk. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of inadequate serum vitamin D levels in institutionalized, postmenopausal, osteoporotic women. Assessment of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] was performed in 445 institutionalized, osteoporotic women from nine countries (Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Spain and UK). For each institutionalized woman, three age-matched, noninstitutionalized, osteoporotic controls were also included. Four cutoffs of 25(OH)D inadequacy were fixed: less than 80, less than 75, less than 50 and less than 30 nmol/l. Mean age was 79.7 years (standard deviation [SD] = 5.8) for the institutionalized women and 79.5 years (SD = 5.5) for the noninstitutionalized women (p = 0.45). Significantly fewer institutionalized women received vitamin D supplements (13.2 vs 24.0%; p < 0.0001). In women without vitamin D supplements, the level of 25(OH)D was significantly lower in institutionalized women (56.9 [SD = 23.9] nmol/l) compared with noninstitutionalized women (63.2 [SD = 22.0] nmol/l; p < 0.0001). In institutionalized women (without vitamin D supplements), the prevalence of 25(OH)D inadequacy was 10.4, 41.2, 80.3 and 84.2% when considering cutoffs of 80, 75, 50 and 30 nmol/l, respectively. In the control group, the prevalence was 2.7, 22.9, 74.4 and 81.7%, respectively. The prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy was significantly higher in institutionalized women when considering the 75, 50 and 30 nmol/l cutoffs but not when considering the 80 nmol/l cutoff. This study highlights a high prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy in institutionalized, osteoporotic women. Compared with age-matched osteoporotic controls, the prevalence of severe vitamin D inadequacy was substantially more important in institutionalized women. We believe that a greater awareness of the importance of vitamin D inadequacy is needed in order to address this public health problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19102640     DOI: 10.2217/17455057.5.1.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)        ISSN: 1745-5057


  11 in total

Review 1.  Dietary Vitamin D Intake for the Elderly Population: Update on the Recommended Dietary Allowance for Vitamin D.

Authors:  Lynette M Smith; J Christopher Gallagher
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 4.741

2.  Impact of 3-Monthly Vitamin D Supplementation Plus Exercise on Survival after Surgery for Osteoporotic Hip Fracture in Adult Patients over 50 Years: A Pragmatic Randomized, Partially Blinded, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  A Laiz; J Malouf; A Marin; V Longobardi; J de Caso; J Farrerons; J Casademont
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Vitamin D deficiency remains prevalent despite increased laboratory testing in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Paul Quaggiotto; Huy Tran; Marie Bhanugopan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Vitamin D status, dependence on age, and seasonal variations in the concentration of vitamin D in Croatian postmenopausal women initially screened for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nadica Laktasic-Zerjavic; Mirko Korsic; Zeljka Crncevic-Orlic; Zdenko Kovac; Ozren Polasek; Dragica Soldo-Juresa
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Nutritional approach for inhibiting bone resorption in institutionalized elderly women with vitamin D insufficiency and high prevalence of fracture.

Authors:  J-P Bonjour; V Benoit; O Pourchaire; B Rousseau; J-C Souberbielle
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.075

6.  Determinants of vitamin D supplementation prescription in nursing homes: a survey among general practitioners.

Authors:  F Buckinx; J Y Reginster; E Cavalier; J Petermans; C Ricour; C Dardenne; O Bruyère
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Vitamin D and aging.

Authors:  J Christopher Gallagher
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.741

8.  Vitamin D and COVID-19: evidence and recommendations for supplementation.

Authors:  George Griffin; Martin Hewison; Julian Hopkin; Rose Kenny; Richard Quinton; Jonathan Rhodes; Sreedhar Subramanian; David Thickett
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Vitamin D deficiency was common among nursing home residents and associated with dementia: a cross sectional study of 545 Swedish nursing home residents.

Authors:  Rebeka Arnljots; Jörgen Thorn; Marie Elm; Michael Moore; Pär-Daniel Sundvall
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Bacteriuria and vitamin D deficiency: a cross sectional study of 385 nursing home residents.

Authors:  Rebeka Arnljots; Egill Snaebjörnsson Arnljots; Jörgen Thorn; Marie Elm; Michael Moore; Pär-Daniel Sundvall
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.