Literature DB >> 19102619

Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory).

Ahmed M Megreya1, A Mike Burton.   

Abstract

Eyewitness memory is known to be fallible. We describe 3 experiments that aim to establish baseline performance for recognition of unfamiliar faces. In Experiment 1, viewers were shown live actors or photos (targets), and then immediately presented with arrays of 10 faces (test items). Asked whether the target was present among the test items, and if so to identify the person, participants showed poor performance levels (roughly 70% accurate). Furthermore, there was no difference between immediate memory for a live person and photograph. In Experiment 2, the same targets and test items were presented simultaneously, and participants were asked to perform a matching task. Again, performance was poor (roughly 68% accurate), with no difference between matching photos and live people. In the final experiment, viewers were asked to match a live person to a single photograph. Even under these conditions, performance was poor (c. 85%), with no advantage over matching 2 photographs. We suggest that problems of eyewitness identification may involve difficulties in initial encoding of unfamiliar faces, in addition to problems of memory for an event. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19102619     DOI: 10.1037/a0013464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  26 in total

1.  Validation of forensic facial comparison by morphological analysis in photographic and CCTV samples.

Authors:  Nicholas Bacci; Tobias M R Houlton; Nanette Briers; Maryna Steyn
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Infrequent identity mismatches are frequently undetected.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The poverty of embodied cognition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Megan H Papesh; Anthony S Barnhart; Whitney A Hansen; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 4.  Stable face representations.

Authors:  Rob Jenkins; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Identifying criminals: No biasing effect of criminal context on recalled threat.

Authors:  Terence J McElvaney; Magda Osman; Isabelle Mareschal
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-01-13

6.  How Different is Different? Criterion and Sensitivity in Face-Space.

Authors:  Harold Hill; Peter Claes; Michelle Corcoran; Mark Walters; Alan Johnston; John Gerald Clement
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-03-23

7.  Feedback training for facial image comparison.

Authors:  David White; Richard I Kemp; Rob Jenkins; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

8.  The 20 item prosopagnosia index (PI20): relationship with the Glasgow face-matching test.

Authors:  Punit Shah; Sophie Sowden; Anne Gaule; Caroline Catmur; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Generalization across view in face memory and face matching.

Authors:  Alejandro J Estudillo; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-11-24

10.  Passport officers' errors in face matching.

Authors:  David White; Richard I Kemp; Rob Jenkins; Michael Matheson; A Mike Burton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.