Literature DB >> 19101766

Method of detection of initial recurrence of stage II/III cutaneous melanoma: analysis of the utility of follow-up staging.

Michael O Meyers1, Jen Jen Yeh, Jill Frank, Patricia Long, Allison M Deal, Keith D Amos, David W Ollila.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The follow-up of patients with cutaneous melanoma is controversial. Current recommendations suggest routine history and physical examination every 3 to 6 months for the first 3 years and correlate studies including laboratory tests and radiographic imaging. However, the utility of these recommendations are unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of routine imaging on the method of detection of first recurrence in patients with stage II and sentinel lymph node-positive stage III melanoma.
METHODS: We analyzed a prospective database of all cutaneous melanoma patients treated at our institution from 1997 to 2005 who had at least 2 years of follow-up. The method of detection of initial recurrence was analyzed.
RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients with stage II (n = 83) or III (n = 35) melanoma who were followed for at least 2 years were identified. Forty-three of these patients developed recurrence (median time to recurrence, 14 months). Site of first recurrence was as follows: 4 local, 17 in transit, 7 regional lymph node, and 15 distant. Twenty-nine recurrences (67%) were either patient detected or symptomatic. Eleven (26%) were detected by the physician at routine follow-up. Only three (7%) were identified by imaging (two chest X-ray and one brain magnetic resonance imaging) in an otherwise asymptomatic patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of all initial recurrences of cutaneous melanoma were either detected by a patient or were symptomatic, with most of the remainder detected during routine physical examination. Routine imaging added little value in the detection of initial recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19101766     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-0238-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  21 in total

1.  Correspondence between pigmented lesions identified by melanoma patients trained to perform partner-assisted skin self-examination and dermatological examination.

Authors:  Jerod L Stapleton; Rob Turrisi; Kimberly A Mallett; June K Robinson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Preferential induction of apoptotic cell death in melanoma cells as compared with normal keratinocytes using a non-thermal plasma torch.

Authors:  Shoshanna N Zucker; Jennifer Zirnheld; Archis Bagati; Thomas M DiSanto; Benjamin Des Soye; Joseph A Wawrzyniak; Kasra Etemadi; Mikhail Nikiforov; Ronald Berezney
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  Skin Examination Practices Among Melanoma Survivors and Their Children.

Authors:  Beth A Glenn; Katherine L Chen; L Cindy Chang; Tiffany Lin; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  The role of routine imaging in pediatric cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Hadeel Halalsheh; Sue C Kaste; Fariba Navid; Armita Bahrami; Barry L Shulkin; Bhaskar Rao; Michelle Kunkel; Nathan Artz; Alberto Pappo
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  Utility of 3-year torso computed tomography and head imaging in asymptomatic patients with high-risk melanoma.

Authors:  Erin R DeRose; Alexander Pleet; Wei Wang; Virginia J Seery; Mee Young Lee; Sharon Renzi; Ryan J Sullivan; Michael B Atkins
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 6.  Long-term follow-up for melanoma patients: is there any evidence of a benefit?

Authors:  Natasha M Rueth; Kate D Cromwell; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.495

7.  Patient satisfaction with GP-led melanoma follow-up: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P Murchie; M C Nicolson; P C Hannaford; E A Raja; A J Lee; N C Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Variability in melanoma post-treatment surveillance practices by country and physician specialty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kate D Cromwell; Merrick I Ross; Yan Xing; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard E Royal; Anthony Lucci; Jeffrey E Lee; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Developing an Evidence-based Followup Schedule for Bone Sarcomas Based on Local Recurrence and Metastatic Progression.

Authors:  Cara Cipriano; Anthony M Griffin; Peter C Ferguson; Jay S Wunder
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Can we use technology to encourage self-monitoring by people treated for melanoma? A qualitative exploration of the perceptions of potential recipients.

Authors:  S Hall; P Murchie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.