Monika I Hasenbring1, Dirk Hallner, Adina C Rusu. 1. Dept. of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany. Monika.Hasenbring@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Abstract
AIM OF INVESTIGATION: Recent research indicated wide variability regarding pain-related cognitive/affective and behavioral responses to pain, showing that fear-avoidance responses (FAR) and endurance-responses (ER) play a prominent role in the maintenance of low back pain (LBP). Until now, there is a lack of reliable and valid instruments covering FAR and ER. METHODS: A pool of 60 items, derived from the Kiel Pain Inventory was answered by 191 LBP patients. Principle components analyses (PCA) was used to explore the factor structure creating the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ). Validity was calculated using the criteria variables pain intensity, disability, chronic pain grades (CPG) and number of sick days, further self-report measures (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire FABQ, Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale PASS, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia TSK and Beck Depression Inventory BDI) evaluating construct validity. RESULTS: PCA revealed five AEQ-FAR scales with anxiety/depression, catastrophizing, help-/hopelessness, avoidance of social activities, avoidance of physical activities, and four AEQ-ER scales with positive mood, thought suppression, pain persistence behavior and humor/distraction. All scales revealed high internal consistency. As expected, FAR scales showed positive associations with pain, disability and other FAR variables (correlations between r=.26 and r=.58), whereas ER scales showed negative associations (between r=-.19 and -.48). The only exception referred to positive correlations between both, FAR and ER and pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: The AEQ has shown as a reliable and valid measure to assess pattern of fear-avoidance and endurance-related responses to pain. Both aspects seem to play a role in the maintenance of LBP.
AIM OF INVESTIGATION: Recent research indicated wide variability regarding pain-related cognitive/affective and behavioral responses to pain, showing that fear-avoidance responses (FAR) and endurance-responses (ER) play a prominent role in the maintenance of low back pain (LBP). Until now, there is a lack of reliable and valid instruments covering FAR and ER. METHODS: A pool of 60 items, derived from the Kiel Pain Inventory was answered by 191 LBP patients. Principle components analyses (PCA) was used to explore the factor structure creating the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ). Validity was calculated using the criteria variables pain intensity, disability, chronic pain grades (CPG) and number of sick days, further self-report measures (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire FABQ, Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale PASS, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia TSK and Beck Depression Inventory BDI) evaluating construct validity. RESULTS: PCA revealed five AEQ-FAR scales with anxiety/depression, catastrophizing, help-/hopelessness, avoidance of social activities, avoidance of physical activities, and four AEQ-ER scales with positive mood, thought suppression, pain persistence behavior and humor/distraction. All scales revealed high internal consistency. As expected, FAR scales showed positive associations with pain, disability and other FAR variables (correlations between r=.26 and r=.58), whereas ER scales showed negative associations (between r=-.19 and -.48). The only exception referred to positive correlations between both, FAR and ER and pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: The AEQ has shown as a reliable and valid measure to assess pattern of fear-avoidance and endurance-related responses to pain. Both aspects seem to play a role in the maintenance of LBP.
Authors: Thomas Kienbacher; Elisabeth Fehrmann; Richard Habenicht; Christian Oeffel; Josef Kollmitzer; Patrick Mair; Gerold Ebenbichler Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 3.134