OBJECTIVE: KITL/KIT can elicit diverse sets of signals within lymphoid, myeloid, mast, and erythroid lineages, and exert distinct effects on growth, survival, migration, adhesion, and secretory responses. Presently, we have applied a PY-mutant allele knockin approach to specifically assess possible roles for KIT-PY567 and KIT-PY719 sites, and coupled pathways, during erythropoiesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mouse models used to investigate this problem include those harboring knocked-in KIT(Y567F/Y567F), KIT(Y569F/Y569F), KIT(Y719F,Y719F), and KIT(Y567F/Y567F:Y569F/Y569F) alleles. The erythron was stressed by myelosuppression using 5-fluorouracil, and by phenylhydrazine-induced hemolysis. In addition, optimized systems for ex vivo analyses of bone marrow and splenic erythropoiesis were employed to more directly analyze possible stage-specific effects on erythroid cell growth, survival, development and KIT signaling events. RESULTS: In Kit(Y567F/Y567F) mice, steady-state erythropoiesis was unperturbed while recovery from anemia due to 5-fluorouracil or phenylhydrazine was markedly impaired. Deficiencies in erythroid progenitor expansion occurred both in the bone marrow and the spleen. Responses to chronic erythropoietin dosing were also compromised. Ex vivo, Kit(Y567F/Y567F) (pro)erythroblast development was skewed from a Kit(pos)CD71(high) stage toward a subsequent Kit(neg)CD71(high) compartment. Proliferation and, to an extent, survival capacities were also compromised. Similar stage-specific defects existed for erythroid progenitors from Kit(Y567F/Y567F:Y569F/Y569F) but not KIT(Y719F/Y719F) mice. Kit(Y567F/Y567F) erythroblasts were used further to analyze KIT-PY567-dependent signals. MEK-1,2/ERK-1,2 signaling was unaffected while AKT, p70S6K, and especially JNK2/p54 pathways were selectively attenuated. CONCLUSIONS: Nonredundant KIT-PY567-directed erythroblast-intrinsic signals are selectively critical for stress erythropoiesis. Investigations also add to an understanding of how KIT directs distinct outcomes among diverse progenitors and lineages.
OBJECTIVE:KITL/KIT can elicit diverse sets of signals within lymphoid, myeloid, mast, and erythroid lineages, and exert distinct effects on growth, survival, migration, adhesion, and secretory responses. Presently, we have applied a PY-mutant allele knockin approach to specifically assess possible roles for KIT-PY567 and KIT-PY719 sites, and coupled pathways, during erythropoiesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Mouse models used to investigate this problem include those harboring knocked-in KIT(Y567F/Y567F), KIT(Y569F/Y569F), KIT(Y719F,Y719F), and KIT(Y567F/Y567F:Y569F/Y569F) alleles. The erythron was stressed by myelosuppression using 5-fluorouracil, and by phenylhydrazine-induced hemolysis. In addition, optimized systems for ex vivo analyses of bone marrow and splenic erythropoiesis were employed to more directly analyze possible stage-specific effects on erythroid cell growth, survival, development and KIT signaling events. RESULTS: In Kit(Y567F/Y567F) mice, steady-state erythropoiesis was unperturbed while recovery from anemia due to 5-fluorouracil or phenylhydrazine was markedly impaired. Deficiencies in erythroid progenitor expansion occurred both in the bone marrow and the spleen. Responses to chronic erythropoietin dosing were also compromised. Ex vivo, Kit(Y567F/Y567F) (pro)erythroblast development was skewed from a Kit(pos)CD71(high) stage toward a subsequent Kit(neg)CD71(high) compartment. Proliferation and, to an extent, survival capacities were also compromised. Similar stage-specific defects existed for erythroid progenitors from Kit(Y567F/Y567F:Y569F/Y569F) but not KIT(Y719F/Y719F) mice. Kit(Y567F/Y567F) erythroblasts were used further to analyze KIT-PY567-dependent signals. MEK-1,2/ERK-1,2 signaling was unaffected while AKT, p70S6K, and especially JNK2/p54 pathways were selectively attenuated. CONCLUSIONS: Nonredundant KIT-PY567-directed erythroblast-intrinsic signals are selectively critical for stress erythropoiesis. Investigations also add to an understanding of how KIT directs distinct outcomes among diverse progenitors and lineages.
Authors: R Duttlinger; K Manova; G Berrozpe; T Y Chu; V DeLeon; I Timokhina; R S Chaganti; A D Zelenetz; R F Bachvarova; P Besmer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1995-04-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Lilian Varricchio; Valentina Tirelli; Elena Masselli; Barbara Ghinassi; Nayanendu Saha; Peter Besmer; Anna Rita Migliaccio Journal: Stem Cells Dev Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 3.272
Authors: Kelly A McGowan; Wendy W Pang; Rashmi Bhardwaj; Marcelina G Perez; John V Pluvinage; Bertil E Glader; Reem Malek; Susan M Mendrysa; Irving L Weissman; Christopher Y Park; Gregory S Barsh Journal: Blood Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Kyle J Hewitt; Koichi R Katsumura; Daniel R Matson; Prithvia Devadas; Nobuyuki Tanimura; Alexander S Hebert; Joshua J Coon; Jin-Soo Kim; Colin N Dewey; Sunduz Keles; Siyang Hao; Robert F Paulson; Emery H Bresnick Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Benedikt Bosbach; Ferdinand Rossi; Yasemin Yozgat; Jennifer Loo; Jennifer Q Zhang; Georgina Berrozpe; Katherine Warpinski; Imke Ehlers; Darren Veach; Andrew Kwok; Katia Manova; Cristina R Antonescu; Ronald P DeMatteo; Peter Besmer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 11.205