Robert F Paulson1, Lei Shi, Dai-Chen Wu. 1. Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Center for Molecular Immunology and Infectious Disease, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA. rfp5@psu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute anemic stress induces a physiological response that includes the rapid development of new erythrocytes. This process is referred to as stress erythropoiesis, which is distinct from steady state erythropoiesis. Much of what we know about stress erythropoiesis comes from the analysis of murine models. In this review, we will discuss our current understanding of the mechanisms that regulate stress erythropoiesis in mice and discuss outstanding questions in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: Stress erythropoiesis occurs in the murine spleen, fetal liver and adult liver. The signals that regulate this process are Hedgehog, bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4), stem cell factor and hypoxia. Recent findings show that stress erythropoiesis utilizes a population of erythroid-restricted self-renewing stress progenitors. Although the BMP4-dependent stress erythropoiesis pathway was first characterized during the recovery from acute anemia, analysis of a mouse model of chronic anemia demonstrated that activation of the BMP4-dependent stress erythropoiesis pathway provides compensatory erythropoiesis in response to chronic anemia as well. SUMMARY: The BMP4-dependent stress erythropoiesis pathway plays a key role in the recovery from acute anemia and new data show that this pathway compensates for ineffective steady state erythropoiesis in a murine model of chronic anemia. The identification of a self-renewing population of stress erythroid progenitors in mice suggests that therapeutic manipulation of this pathway may be useful for the treatment of human anemia. However, the development of new therapies will await the characterization of an analogous pathway in humans.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute anemic stress induces a physiological response that includes the rapid development of new erythrocytes. This process is referred to as stress erythropoiesis, which is distinct from steady state erythropoiesis. Much of what we know about stress erythropoiesis comes from the analysis of murine models. In this review, we will discuss our current understanding of the mechanisms that regulate stress erythropoiesis in mice and discuss outstanding questions in the field. RECENT FINDINGS:Stress erythropoiesis occurs in the murine spleen, fetal liver and adult liver. The signals that regulate this process are Hedgehog, bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4), stem cell factor and hypoxia. Recent findings show that stress erythropoiesis utilizes a population of erythroid-restricted self-renewing stress progenitors. Although the BMP4-dependent stress erythropoiesis pathway was first characterized during the recovery from acute anemia, analysis of a mouse model of chronic anemia demonstrated that activation of the BMP4-dependent stress erythropoiesis pathway provides compensatory erythropoiesis in response to chronic anemia as well. SUMMARY: The BMP4-dependent stress erythropoiesis pathway plays a key role in the recovery from acute anemia and new data show that this pathway compensates for ineffective steady state erythropoiesis in a murine model of chronic anemia. The identification of a self-renewing population of stress erythroid progenitors in mice suggests that therapeutic manipulation of this pathway may be useful for the treatment of humananemia. However, the development of new therapies will await the characterization of an analogous pathway in humans.
Authors: R Galanello; S Barella; L Maccioni; E Paglietti; M A Melis; M C Rosatelli; F Argiolu; A Cao Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 1989-08 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Lionel Blanc; Steven L Ciciotte; Babette Gwynn; Gordon J Hildick-Smith; Eric L Pierce; Kathleen A Soltis; Jeffrey D Cooney; Barry H Paw; Luanne L Peters Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-07-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yuanting Chen; Jie Xiang; Fenghua Qian; Bastihalli T Diwakar; Baiye Ruan; Siyang Hao; K Sandeep Prabhu; Robert F Paulson Journal: Blood Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Lilian Varricchio; Valentina Tirelli; Elena Masselli; Barbara Ghinassi; Nayanendu Saha; Peter Besmer; Anna Rita Migliaccio Journal: Stem Cells Dev Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 3.272
Authors: Michael Dussiot; Thiago T Maciel; Aurélie Fricot; Céline Chartier; Olivier Negre; Joel Veiga; Damien Grapton; Etienne Paubelle; Emmanuel Payen; Yves Beuzard; Philippe Leboulch; Jean-Antoine Ribeil; Jean-Benoit Arlet; Francine Coté; Geneviève Courtois; Yelena Z Ginzburg; Thomas O Daniel; Rajesh Chopra; Victoria Sung; Olivier Hermine; Ivan C Moura Journal: Nat Med Date: 2014-03-23 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Xiaofei Gao; Hsiang-Ying Lee; Wenbo Li; Randall Jeffrey Platt; M Inmaculada Barrasa; Qi Ma; Russell R Elmes; Michael G Rosenfeld; Harvey F Lodish Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 11.205