Literature DB >> 19098245

Effect of age on the behavioral and physiological responses of piglets to tail docking and ear notching.

S Torrey1, N Devillers, M Lessard, C Farmer, T Widowski.   

Abstract

Neonatal piglets are often subject to potentially painful processing procedures such as tail docking and ear notching during the first few days after birth. However, these procedures may influence the development of suckling behavior and passive transfer of immunoglobulins, especially if done within the first day postpartum. The objective of this experiment was to compare the effects of processing piglets during the first 24 h versus at 3 d of age on suckling and pain-related behavior, the passive transfer of immunoglobulins, and growth. Six piglets per litter from 20 litters (n = 120 piglets) were used in a 3 x 2 complete block design. Piglets were weighed at birth and assigned to 1 of 3 treatments (balanced by birth weight): control (unmanipulated), sham processed (manually manipulated), and processed (tail docked and ear notched) at 1 of 2 ages (1 or 3 d of age). Vocalizations were recorded during the procedures, and piglets were observed after the procedures for pain-related behavior. Suckling behavior was observed for 6 h on each of d 1 to 4. Colostrum samples were collected after the birth of all piglets (before first suck), and blood samples were collected on d 5 to examine concentrations of immunoglobulins (IgA and IgG) and IGF-I. Body weights were measured at birth and on d 5 and 14. During the procedures, processed piglets, regardless of age, vocalized at a greater frequency (P < 0.001) and produced more high frequency calls (P = 0.016) than sham-processed piglets. All piglets on d 1 produced more high frequency calls than all piglets on d 3 (P = 0.047). Immediately after the procedures, sham-processed and processed piglets spent less time lying and more time standing than control piglets (P < 0.001), whereas processed piglets jammed their tail between their legs more than sham-processed or control piglets (P < 0.001). Lying, standing and tail posture were not influenced by age, nor were there age by treatment interactions. Piglets on d 1 trembled more than piglets on d 3 (P < 0.001), and this tended to be exacerbated by processing (P = 0.076). There was no effect of treatment or age of treatment on suckling behavior. Processed piglets had decreased IgG serum concentrations compared with sham-processed and control piglets (P = 0.029), although there was no interaction between treatment and age of treatment (P = 0.67). Whereas tail docking and ear notching do appear to result in short-term pain and modulated immune status, processing on d 1 appears neither better nor worse than processing on d 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19098245     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS).

Authors:  Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna; Ana Lucélia de Araújo; Pedro Isidro da Nóbrega Neto; Juliana Tabarelli Brondani; Flávia Augusta de Oliveira; Liliane Marinho Dos Santos Azerêdo; Felipe Garcia Telles; Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The Assessment of Facial Expressions in Piglets Undergoing Tail Docking and Castration: Toward the Development of the Piglet Grimace Scale.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Di Giminiani; Victoria L M H Brierley; Annalisa Scollo; Flaviana Gottardo; Emma M Malcolm; Sandra A Edwards; Matthew C Leach
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-14

3.  Comparison of Intramuscular or Subcutaneous Injections vs. Castration in Pigs-Impacts on Behavior and Welfare.

Authors:  John McGlone; Kimberly Guay; Arlene Garcia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Comparison of Vocalization Patterns in Piglets Which Were Crushed to Those Which Underwent Human Restraint.

Authors:  Nichole M Chapel; Jeffrey R Lucas; Scott Radcliffe; Kara R Stewart; Donald C Lay
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Evidence of Pain, Stress, and Fear of Humans During Tail Docking and the Next Four Weeks in Piglets (Sus scrofa domesticus).

Authors:  Céline Tallet; Marine Rakotomahandry; Sabine Herlemont; Armelle Prunier
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-12-11

Review 6.  Management and Feeding Strategies in Early Life to Increase Piglet Performance and Welfare around Weaning: A Review.

Authors:  Laia Blavi; David Solà-Oriol; Pol Llonch; Sergi López-Vergé; Susana María Martín-Orúe; José Francisco Pérez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Comparative effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs at castration and tail-docking in neonatal piglets.

Authors:  Emma Nixon; Alexandra R Carlson; Patricia A Routh; Liliana Hernandez; Glen W Almond; Ronald E Baynes; Kristen M Messenger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A Review of Pain Assessment in Pigs.

Authors:  Sarah H Ison; R Eddie Clutton; Pierpaolo Di Giminiani; Kenneth M D Rutherford
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-28

Review 9.  Impact of Routine Management Procedures on the Welfare of Suckling Piglets.

Authors:  Simone M Schmid; Julia Steinhoff-Wagner
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.