Literature DB >> 19097004

The polished tri-tapered stem for cement-in-cement revision hip arthroplasty, a reliable and reproducible technique?

J Young1, V R P Vallamshetla, T Lawrence.   

Abstract

The object of this study was to determine the short to medium term outcome of cementing a highly polished tapered implant into the old cement mantle once damaged cement is removed at the time of revision hip surgery. A consecutive series of 36 patients underwent c-stem cement-in-cement revision hip arthroplasty between June 2000 and April 2006. The primary outcome measure was the validated shortened Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score, secondary outcomes were the Orthowave company patient satisfaction survey, radiological analysis, and general complications. The follow-up period was between 12 and 84 months (average 48.86 months). The mean post op WOMAC score at latest follow-up was 10.89 (0 to 29). Two patients died with their hip in situ. Two patients had radiological signs of prosthesis loosening on follow-up. Complications included: one sacral plexus palsy which had a partial recovery and one intra-operative periprosthetic fracture. One patient underwent cup revision for recurrent dislocation. Cement within cement revision hip arthroplasty using a highly polished tapered stem in the short to medium term provides satisfactory functional outcomes and is associated with a low complication rate and good survivorship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19097004     DOI: 10.1177/112070000801800402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   1.756


  5 in total

1.  Difficulties associated with the variable geometry of different-offset Exeter long stems in cement-in-cement technique: A case report.

Authors:  Francisco Ferrero-Manzanal; Antonio Murcia-Asensio; Miguel Angel Suárez-Suárez; Raquel Lax-Pérez; Oliver Marín-Peña
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27

2.  The cement-in-cement technique is a reliable option in hip arthroplasty revision surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francisco Xará-Leite; Ana Daniela Pereira; Renato Andrade; André Sarmento; Ricardo Sousa; Olufemi R Ayeni; João Espregueira-Mendes; Daniel Soares
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-07-14

Review 3.  The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise.

Authors:  Adam T Yasen; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Cement-in-cement technique of the femoral component in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision: A systematic review of the contemporary literature.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Fabio Mancino; Amil Agarwal; Leonidas Roumeliotis; Alex Gu; Ioannis Gkiatas; Danilo Togninalli; Vasileios S Nikolaou; Michael M Alexiades
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-30

5.  Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond?

Authors:  A Liddle; M Webb; N Clement; S Green; J Liddle; M German; J Holland
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.853

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.