BACKGROUND: Developed for use in health research, the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality (BMMRS) consists of brief measures of a broad range of religiousness and spirituality (R/S) dimensions. It has established psychometric properties among adults, but little is known about its appropriateness for use with adolescents. PURPOSE: We assessed the psychometric properties of the BMMRS among adolescents. METHOD: We recruited a racially diverse (85% non-White) sample of 305 adolescents aged 12-18 years (median 16 yrs, IQR 14-17) from 3 urban medical clinics; 93 completed a retest 1 week later. We assessed internal consistency and test-retest reliability. We assessed construct validity by examining how well the measures discriminated groups expected to differ based on self-reported religious preference, and how they related to a hypothesized correlate, depressive symptoms. Religious preference was categorized into "No religion/Atheist" (11%), "Don't know/Confused" (9%), or "Named a religion" (80%). RESULTS: Responses to multi-item measures were generally internally consistent (alpha > or = 0.70 for 12/16 measures) and stable over 1 week (intraclass correlation coefficients > or = 0.70 for 14/16). Forgiveness, Negative R/S Coping, and Commitment items showed lower internal cohesiveness. Scores on most measures were higher (p < 0.05) among those who "Named a religion" compared to the "No religion/Atheist" group. Forgiveness, Commitment, and Anticipated Support from members of one's congregation were inversely correlated with depressive symptoms, while BMMRS measures assessing negative R/S experiences (Negative R/S Coping, Negative Interactions with others in congregation, Loss in Faith) were positively correlated with depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that most BMMRS measures are reliable and valid for use among adolescents.
BACKGROUND: Developed for use in health research, the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality (BMMRS) consists of brief measures of a broad range of religiousness and spirituality (R/S) dimensions. It has established psychometric properties among adults, but little is known about its appropriateness for use with adolescents. PURPOSE: We assessed the psychometric properties of the BMMRS among adolescents. METHOD: We recruited a racially diverse (85% non-White) sample of 305 adolescents aged 12-18 years (median 16 yrs, IQR 14-17) from 3 urban medical clinics; 93 completed a retest 1 week later. We assessed internal consistency and test-retest reliability. We assessed construct validity by examining how well the measures discriminated groups expected to differ based on self-reported religious preference, and how they related to a hypothesized correlate, depressive symptoms. Religious preference was categorized into "No religion/Atheist" (11%), "Don't know/Confused" (9%), or "Named a religion" (80%). RESULTS: Responses to multi-item measures were generally internally consistent (alpha > or = 0.70 for 12/16 measures) and stable over 1 week (intraclass correlation coefficients > or = 0.70 for 14/16). Forgiveness, Negative R/S Coping, and Commitment items showed lower internal cohesiveness. Scores on most measures were higher (p < 0.05) among those who "Named a religion" compared to the "No religion/Atheist" group. Forgiveness, Commitment, and Anticipated Support from members of one's congregation were inversely correlated with depressive symptoms, while BMMRS measures assessing negative R/S experiences (Negative R/S Coping, Negative Interactions with others in congregation, Loss in Faith) were positively correlated with depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that most BMMRS measures are reliable and valid for use among adolescents.
Authors: Leila Shahabi; Lynda H Powell; Marc A Musick; Kenneth I Pargament; Carl E Thoresen; David Williams; Lynn Underwood; Marcia A Ory Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2002
Authors: George Fitchett; Patricia E Murphy; Jo Kim; James L Gibbons; Jacqueline R Cameron; Judy A Davis Journal: Int J Psychiatry Med Date: 2004 Impact factor: 1.210
Authors: John R Knight; Lon Sherritt; Sion Kim Harris; David W Holder; John Kulig; Lydia A Shrier; Joy Gabrielli; Grace Chang Journal: South Med J Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: H G Koenig; H J Cohen; D G Blazer; C Pieper; K G Meador; F Shelp; V Goli; B DiPasquale Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1992-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Sian Cotton; Jerren C Weekes; Meghan E McGrady; Susan L Rosenthal; Michael S Yi; Kenneth Pargament; Paul Succop; Yvonne Humenay Roberts; Joel Tsevat Journal: J Relig Health Date: 2012-03
Authors: C L M Joseph; S L Havstad; D Johnson; J Saltzgaber; E L Peterson; K Resnicow; D R Ownby; A P Baptist; C C Johnson; V J Strecher Journal: J Asthma Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.515