Literature DB >> 17900461

Trends in hemodialysis vascular access from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) 2000 to 2005.

Louise M Moist1, Sean H Chang, Kevan R Polkinghorne, Stephen P McDonald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Australia historically has been recognized for its high fistula use. STUDY
DESIGN: Observational study using registry data. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients registered in the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry on hemodialysis in Australia. PREDICTOR: Cohort year. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENT: Hemodialysis access trends were examined from 2000 to 2005 for incident patients (within 60 days of hemodialysis therapy start), patients on hemodialysis therapy for 6 to 8 months, and prevalent hemodialysis patients. Multivariate analyses were performed to examine the relationship between access type and cohort year for each group, with adjustment for age, sex, race, body mass index, late referral, smoking status, cause of end-stage renal disease, comorbidities, and dialysis vintage.
RESULTS: During 2000 to 2005, catheter use increased from 39% to 53% in incident patients, 10% to 22% in the 6- to 8-month groups, and 6% to 13% in prevalent patients. Fistula use decreased from 56% to 43% in incident patients and 78% to 67% in the 6- to 8-month group and remained at 73% to 75% in prevalent patients. Graft use decreased in all groups. Adjustment for factors associated with access type did not significantly change these results. LIMITATIONS: The registry collects only the access in use at the end of the survey period; thus, it was not possible to determine whether another access had failed or was present, but not in use. The small number of incident numbers prevented separate analysis of arteriovenous fistulas and arteriovenous grafts.
CONCLUSION: Incident use of fistulas and grafts decreased, with an unexpected increase in both incident and prevalent catheters between 2000 and 2005. Adjustment for factors associated with access type did not significantly alter the trends. Changes in unidentified practice patterns, attitudes, or preferences are contributing to these trends. Ongoing evaluation of data and investigation into processes of care are required to increase functioning fistulas, together with reevaluation of the role of grafts in patients without a fistula.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17900461     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  8 in total

1.  Relationship between dialysis modality and mortality.

Authors:  Stephen P McDonald; Mark R Marshall; David W Johnson; Kevan R Polkinghorne
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Who should be referred for a fistula? A survey of nephrologists.

Authors:  Wang Xi; Jennifer MacNab; Charmaine E Lok; Timmy C Lee; Ivan D Maya; Michele H Mokrzycki; Louise M Moist
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Increased hemodialysis catheter use in Canada and associated mortality risk: data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry 2001-2004.

Authors:  Louise M Moist; Lilyanna Trpeski; Yingbo Na; Charmaine E Lok
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Cumulative patency of contemporary fistulas versus grafts (2000-2010).

Authors:  Charmaine E Lok; Jessica M Sontrop; George Tomlinson; Dheeraj Rajan; Mark Cattral; George Oreopoulos; Jeremy Harris; Louise Moist
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Association of dialysis modality and cardiovascular mortality in incident dialysis patients.

Authors:  David W Johnson; Hannah Dent; Carmel M Hawley; Stephen P McDonald; Johan B Rosman; Fiona G Brown; Kym Bannister; Kathryn J Wiggins
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to hemodialysis in the early period of incident dialysis patients: a nationwide prospective propensity-matched study in Korea.

Authors:  Ji-Young Choi; Hye Min Jang; Jongha Park; Yon Su Kim; Shin-Wook Kang; Chul Woo Yang; Nam-Ho Kim; Jang-Hee Cho; Sun-Hee Park; Chan-Duck Kim; Yong-Lim Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Assessment of Restored Kidney Transplantation Including the Use of Wider Criteria for Accepting Renal Donors After Cancer Excision.

Authors:  Philip Sprott; Adrian D Hibberd; Munish K Heer; Paul R Trevillian; David A Clark; David W Johnson; Christopher Oldmeadow; Simon Chiu; John R Attia
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2019-10-08

8.  CKD.QLD: chronic kidney disease surveillance and research in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Sree K Venuthurupalli; Wendy E Hoy; Helen G Healy; Anne Salisbury; Robert G Fassett
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.992

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.