Literature DB >> 19092086

Moderate versus mediocre: the reliability of spine MR data interpretations.

Jeffrey G Jarvik, Richard A Deyo.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19092086     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2493081458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  Consensus versus disagreement in imaging research: a case study using the LIDC database.

Authors:  Dmitriy Zinovev; Yujie Duo; Daniela S Raicu; Jacob Furst; Samuel G Armato
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Reliability of change in lumbar MRI findings over time in patients with and without disc prosthesis--comparing two different image evaluation methods.

Authors:  Linda Berg; Oivind Gjertsen; Christian Hellum; Gesche Neckelmann; Lars G Johnsen; Geir E Eide; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Influence of nomenclature in the interpretation of lumbar disk contour on MR imaging: a comparison of the agreement using the combined task force and the nordic nomenclatures.

Authors:  E Arana; F M Kovacs; A Royuela; A Estremera; H Sarasíbar; G Amengual; I Galarraga; C Martínez; A Muriel; V Abraira; J Zamora; C Campillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Facet arthropathy evaluation: CT or MRI?

Authors:  Linda Berg; Hanne Thoresen; Gesche Neckelmann; Håvard Furunes; Christian Hellum; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Disc cell therapies: critical issues.

Authors:  Marta Tibiletti; Nevenka Kregar Velikonja; Jill P G Urban; Jeremy C T Fairbank
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Vertebral endplate changes are not associated with chronic low back pain among Southern European subjects: a case control study.

Authors:  F M Kovacs; E Arana; A Royuela; A Estremera; G Amengual; B Asenjo; H Sarasíbar; I Galarraga; A Alonso; C Casillas; A Muriel; C Martínez; V Abraira
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Do more MRI findings imply worse disability or more intense low back pain? A cross-sectional study of candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Linda Berg; Christian Hellum; Øivind Gjertsen; Gesche Neckelmann; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Kjersti Storheim; Jens Ivar Brox; Geir Egil Eide; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis.

Authors:  Linda Berg; Gesche Neckelmann; Oivind Gjertsen; Christian Hellum; Lars G Johnsen; Geir E Eide; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Surgeon Reliability for the Assessment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis on MRI: The Impact of Surgeon Experience.

Authors:  Satyajit V Marawar; Ian A Madom; Mark Palumbo; Richard A Tallarico; Nathaniel R Ordway; Umesh Metkar; Dongliang Wang; Adam Green; William F Lavelle
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12-05

10.  Are two readers more reliable than one? A study of upper neck ligament scoring on magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Ansgar Espeland; Nils Vetti; Jostein Kråkenes
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.