Literature DB >> 19091886

A new PET scanner with semiconductor detectors enables better identification of intratumoral inhomogeneity.

Tohru Shiga1, Yuichi Morimoto, Naoki Kubo, Norio Katoh, Chietsugu Katoh, Wataru Takeuchi, Reiko Usui, Kenji Hirata, Shinichi Kojima, Kikuo Umegaki, Hiroki Shirato, Nagara Tamaki.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: An autoradiography method revealed intratumoral inhomogeneity in various solid tumors. It is becoming increasingly important to estimate intratumoral inhomogeneity. However, with low spatial resolution and high scatter noise, it is difficult to detect intratumoral inhomogeneity in clinical settings. We developed a new PET system with CdTe semiconductor detectors to provide images with high spatial resolution and low scatter noise. Both phantom images and patients' images were analyzed to evaluate intratumoral inhomogeneity.
METHODS: This study was performed with a cold spot phantom that had 6-mm-diameter cold sphenoid defects, a dual-cylinder phantom with an adjusted concentration of 1:2, and an "H"-shaped hot phantom. These were surrounded with water. Phantom images and (18)F-FDG PET images of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer were compared with conventional bismuth germanate PET images. Profile curves for the phantoms were measured as peak-to-valley ratios to define contrast. Intratumoral inhomogeneity and tumor edge sharpness were evaluated on the images of the patients.
RESULTS: The contrast obtained with the semiconductor PET scanner (1.53) was 28% higher than that obtained with the conventional scanner (1.20) for the 6-mm-diameter cold sphenoid phantom. The contrast obtained with the semiconductor PET scanner (1.43) was 27% higher than that obtained with the conventional scanner (1.13) for the dual-cylinder phantom. Similarly, the 2-mm cold region between 1-mm hot rods was identified only by the new PET scanner and not by the conventional scanner. The new PET scanner identified intratumoral inhomogeneity in more detail than the conventional scanner in 6 of 10 patients. The tumor edge was sharper on the images obtained with the new PET scanner than on those obtained with the conventional scanner.
CONCLUSION: These phantom and clinical studies suggested that this new PET scanner has the potential for better identification of intratumoral inhomogeneity, probably because of its high spatial resolution and low scatter noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19091886     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.054833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  9 in total

1.  SUV navigator enables rapid [18F]-FDG PET/CT image interpretation compared with 2D ROI and 3D VOI evaluations.

Authors:  Atsutaka Okizaki; Michihiro Nakayama; Shunta Ishitoya; Kaori Nakajima; Masaaki Yamashina; Tamio Aburano; Koji Takahashi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Simulation study of spatial resolution and sensitivity for the tapered depth of interaction PET detectors for small animal imaging.

Authors:  Sara St James; Yongfeng Yang; Spencer L Bowen; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Hybrid Pixel-Waveform (HPWF) Enabled CdTe Detectors for Small Animal Gamma-Ray Imaging Applications.

Authors:  A Groll; K Kim; H Bhatia; J C Zhang; J H Wang; Z M Shen; L Cai; J Dutta; Q Li; L J Meng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-01

Review 4.  Tumor hypoxia: a new PET imaging biomarker in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Nagara Tamaki; Kenji Hirata
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Can hybrid FDG-PET/CT detect subclinical lymph node metastasis of esophageal cancer appropriately and contribute to radiation treatment planning? A comparison of image-based and pathological findings.

Authors:  Shinichi Shimizu; Masao Hosokawa; Kazuo Itoh; Masahiro Fujita; Hiroaki Takahashi; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Development and translational imaging of a TP53 porcine tumorigenesis model.

Authors:  Jessica C Sieren; David K Meyerholz; Xiao-Jun Wang; Bryan T Davis; John D Newell; Emily Hammond; Judy A Rohret; Frank A Rohret; Jason T Struzynski; J Adam Goeken; Paul W Naumann; Mariah R Leidinger; Agshin Taghiyev; Richard Van Rheeden; Jussara Hagen; Benjamin W Darbro; Dawn E Quelle; Christopher S Rogers
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Local relapse of nasopharyngeal cancer and Voxel-based analysis of FMISO uptake using PET with semiconductor detectors.

Authors:  Yukiko Nishikawa; Koichi Yasuda; Shozo Okamoto; Yoichi M Ito; Rikiya Onimaru; Tohru Shiga; Kazuhiko Tsuchiya; Shiro Watanabe; Wataru Takeuchi; Yuji Kuge; Hao Peng; Nagara Tamaki; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Simulation of the expected performance of a seamless scanner for brain PET based on highly pixelated CdTe detectors.

Authors:  Ekaterina Mikhaylova; Gianluca De Lorenzo; Mokhtar Chmeissani; Machiel Kolstein; Mario Cañadas; Pedro Arce; Yonatan Calderón; Dilber Uzun; Gerard Ariño; José Gabriel Macias-Montero; Ricardo Martinez; Carles Puigdengoles; Enric Cabruja
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  A novel iterative modified bicubic interpolation method enables high-contrast and high-resolution image generation for F-18 FDG-PET.

Authors:  Atsutaka Okizaki; Michihiro Nakayama; Kaori Nakajima; Koji Takahashi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.