| Literature DB >> 19091009 |
Chuan-Kun Liu1, Yan-Hau Chen, Cheng-Yang Tang, Shu-Chuan Chang, Yi-Jung Lin, Ming-Fang Tsai, Yuan-Tsong Chen, Adam Yao.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the flood of information generated by the new generation of sequencing technologies, more efficient bioinformatics tools are needed for in-depth impact analysis of novel genomic variations. FANS (Functional Analysis of Novel SNPs) was developed to streamline comprehensive but tedious functional analysis steps into a few clicks and to offer a carefully designed presentation of results so researchers can focus more on thinking instead of typing and calculating.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19091009 PMCID: PMC2638150 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-S12-S10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Bioinformatics ISSN: 1471-2105 Impact factor: 3.169
Risk types and risk levels used for prioritization of variations
| Non-synonymous | Non-sense | Causes premature stop codon and affects protein function | Very High | |
| Non-synonymous | Mis-sense | Non-conservative change | Predicts to affect protein function | High |
| Non-synonymous | Protein domain abolished | Changes ESE, ESS and known protein domain and results in protein structure abolished | High | |
| Non-synonymous | Splicing regulation | Changes ESE, ESS but does not change known protein domain and results in exon splicing regulation | Medium | |
| Non-synonymous | Conservative change | Does not change ESE, ESS and known protein domain and results in analogous protein structure | Low | |
| Synonymous | Splicing regulation | Splicing regulation (protein domain abolished) | Disrupts exon splicing regulation, make protein domain abolished | High |
| Synonymous | Splicing regulation | Disrupts exon splicing regulation, make the same protein domain | Medium | |
| Synonymous | Sense | Does not change amino acid and disrupt exon splicing regulation | Very Low | |
| Non-coding | Splice site | Alters GT-AG splice site | High | |
Figure 1FANS prioritizing and analysis flow path.
Figure 2The FANS results page. The output of an analysis of eighteen variations in eight chromosomes.
A benchmark comparison of analysis of 10 variations by hand and with FANS.
| Number of Steps Needed | NCBI | 350 | 940 | 4 |
| Ensembl | 80 | |||
| SIFT | 100 | |||
| Rescue-ESE | 120 | |||
| Fas-ESS | 120 | |||
| Calculation | 170 | |||
| Time Taken | 3968 s | 118 s | ||
| Result Pages | 47 | 1 | ||