Literature DB >> 19089551

Risk factors for central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: a 1073-patient study.

Junichi Yoshida1, Toshiyuki Ishimaru, Michiko Fujimoto, Noriko Hirata, Nobuo Matsubara, Nobuhiro Koyanagi.   

Abstract

We intended to evaluate the risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) with central venous (CV) catheters. For the hub of the CV line, we used three-way stopcocks in the first year of the study and closed needleless connectors (NCs) in the second year. Background factors included the age and sex of patients; the ward; the specialty service; the CV catheter and its days of placement; and the staff compounding the intravenous infusion, i.e., either nurses, who disinfect hands-free, or pharmacists using clean benches. Outcome factors included positive culture from the blood-related samples and the body temperature estimate. Of a total of 29 221 device-days in 1073 patients, positive cultures showed an overall incidence of 2.26 per 1000 device-days. Multivariate analysis showed a higher odds ratio of positive cultures for the ICU (odds ratio [OR], 4.415; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.054-9.490]) and for CV catheter placement for more than 30 days (OR, 7.529; 95% CI, 4.279-13.247), but no significance for male sex (OR, 1.752; 95% CI, 0.984-3.119) or for pharmacists' compounding (OR, 2.150; 95% CI, 0.974-4.749). Univariate analysis showed no significance for the following factors: age more than 70 years (OR, 0.968; 95% CI 0.561-1.641), the surgery service (OR, 1.029; 95% CI, 0.582-1.818), double-lumen CV catheters (OR, 0.841; 95% CI, 0.465-1.521), or the NC (1.107; 95% CI, 0.673-1.821). We conclude that the theoretical benefit of the NC, the abolished dead space in the hub, contributed little to the outcomes of blood-related culture. The hands-free disinfection may have resulted in comparable odds ratios for the nurses and the pharmacists compounding the infusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19089551     DOI: 10.1007/s10156-008-0637-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.211


  3 in total

1.  Incorrect aseptic techniques in medicine preparation and recommendations for safer practices: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eeva Suvikas-Peltonen; Suvi Hakoinen; Ercan Celikkayalar; Raisa Laaksonen; Marja Airaksinen
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2016-10-12

2.  Does antimicrobial use density at the ward level influence monthly central line-associated bloodstream infection rates?

Authors:  Junichi Yoshida; Yukiko Harada; Tetsuya Kikuchi; Ikuyo Asano; Takako Ueno; Nobuo Matsubara
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 3.  APSIC guide for prevention of Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI).

Authors:  Moi Lin Ling; Anucha Apisarnthanarak; Namita Jaggi; Glenys Harrington; Keita Morikane; Le Thi Anh Thu; Patricia Ching; Victoria Villanueva; Zhiyong Zong; Jae Sim Jeong; Chun-Ming Lee
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.887

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.