| Literature DB >> 27152193 |
Moi Lin Ling1, Anucha Apisarnthanarak2, Namita Jaggi3, Glenys Harrington4, Keita Morikane5, Le Thi Anh Thu6, Patricia Ching7, Victoria Villanueva8, Zhiyong Zong9, Jae Sim Jeong10, Chun-Ming Lee11.
Abstract
This document is an executive summary of the APSIC Guide for Prevention of Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI). It describes key evidence-based care components of the Central Line Insertion and Maintenance Bundles and its implementation using the quality improvement methodology, namely the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology involving multidisciplinary process and stakeholders. Monitoring of improvement over time with timely feedback to stakeholders is a key component to ensure the success of implementing best practices. A surveillance program is recommended to monitor outcomes and adherence to evidence-based central line insertion and maintenance practices (compliance rate) and identify quality improvement opportunities and strategically targeting interventions for the reduction of CLABSI.Entities:
Keywords: CLABSI; Central line associated bloodstream infections; Insertion bundle; Maintenance bundle; Quality improvement
Year: 2016 PMID: 27152193 PMCID: PMC4857414 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-016-0116-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ISSN: 2047-2994 Impact factor: 4.887
Categories for strength of each recommendation
| Categories for strength of each recommendation | |
| Category | Definition |
| A | Good evidence to support a recommendation for use. |
| B | Moderate evidence to support a recommendation for use. |
| C | Insufficient evidence to support a recommendation for or against use |
| D | Moderate evidence to support a recommendation against use. |
| E | Good evidence to support a recommendation against use. |
| Categories for quality of evidence on which recommendations are made | |
| Grade | Definition |
| I | Evidence from at least one properly randomized, controlled trial. |
| II | Evidence from at least one well-designed clinical trial without randomization, from cohort or case-controlled analytic studies, preferably from more than one centre, from multiple time series, or from dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments. |
| III | Evidence from opinions of respected authorities on the basis of clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees. |
APSIC central line insertion checklist
| Name of patient | Age | Sex | Unique ID | |||||||
| Name of Insertor | Date | Time | Unit | |||||||
| Is the Indication for insertion appropriate? | Yes | No | ||||||||
| Type of Central Venous Catheter | Tunneled | Non-Tunneled | PICC line | Chemoport | Any other: | |||||
| Emergency Procedure | Yes | No | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Was sublclavian or IJ vein the site for insertion - Y/N | ||||||||||
| Has insertor and assistant performed hand hygiene procedures, either by washing hands with liquid soap and water or with alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHR)? | Yes | No | ||||||||
| Was 70 % alcohol and >0.5 % CHG used in cleaning site of insertion? | Yes | No | ||||||||
| Have both the operator and assistant practised maximal sterile barrier precautions (wearing a sterile gown, sterile gloves, and cap and using a full body drape for patient)? | Yes | No | ||||||||
| Signature of person in-charge: | ||||||||||
APSIC central line maintenance checklist
| Name of patient | Age | Sex | Unique ID | ||||||||||||||||||
| Name of Treating physician/Surgeon | Unit | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Type of Central Venous Catheter | Tunneled | Non-Tunneled | PICC line | Chemoport | Any other: | ||||||||||||||||
| Days | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||
| Date | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Y | N | Comment: | Y | N | Comment: | Y | N | Comment: | Y | N | Comment: | Y | N | Comment: | Y | N | Comment: | Y | N | Comment: |
| date for change in dressing, date of IV set change | date for change in dressing, date of IV set change | date for change in dressing, date of IV set change | date for change in dressing, date of IV set change | date for change in dressing, date of IV set change | date for change in dressing, date of IV set change | date for change in dressing, date of IV set change | |||||||||||||||
| Is review done for need for central line use? | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Was hand hygiene practised before all line maintenance/access procedures? | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Was alcohol used to disinfect hub before each access? | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Was dressing changed using aseptic technique? | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Were administration sets replaced every 4-7 days? | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Signature of person in-charge: | |||||||||||||||||||||