Literature DB >> 19087186

Morphological integration in mammalian limb proportions: dissociation between function and development.

Manuela Schmidt1, Martin S Fischer.   

Abstract

During mammalian evolution, fore- and hindlimbs underwent a fundamental reorganization in the transformation from the sprawled to the parasagittal condition. This caused a dissociation between serial and functional homologues. The mobilized scapula functions as the new proximal forelimb element and is functionally analogous to the femur of the hindlimb. Tarsus and metatarsus built a new functional hindlimb element that is functionally analogous to the forearm of the forelimb. Morphological covariation between serially homologous fore- and hindlimb elements can conflict with biomechanical demands when certain intralimb proportions are required for the postural stability of motion. The limb proportions of 189 mammalian species were examined to test whether intralimb proportions are governed by a general principle that corresponds to biomechanical predictions. Morphological covariation between functionally analogous and serially homologous fore- and hindlimb elements was tested by a correlation analysis. A clear relationship exists between the proportions of the first and the third elements of each limb, while the middle element is less involved in alterations of intralimb proportions. Hindlimb proportions are largely uniform across mammals and correspond to biomechanical predictions regarding postural stability. The greater variability in forelimb proportion is likely be the expression of various adaptations but might results also from constraints due to the shared developmental programs with the hindlimb.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19087186     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00583.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  17 in total

1.  Deciphering the Palimpsest: Studying the Relationship Between Morphological Integration and Phenotypic Covariation.

Authors:  Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Heather Jamniczky; Nathan M Young; Campbell Rolian; Trish E Parsons; Julia C Boughner; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 2.  Developmental and Evolutionary Allometry of the Mammalian Limb Skeleton.

Authors:  Kimberly L Cooper
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  Developmental and genetic origins of murine long bone length variation.

Authors:  Thomas J Sanger; Elizabeth A Norgard; L Susan Pletscher; Michael Bevilacqua; Victoria R Brooks; Linda J Sandell; James M Cheverud
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.656

4.  Evolution of the axial system in craniates: morphology and function of the perivertebral musculature.

Authors:  Nadja Schilling
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Development and function explain the modular evolution of phalanges in gecko lizards.

Authors:  Priscila S Rothier; Monique N Simon; Gabriel Marroig; Anthony Herrel; Tiana Kohlsdorf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Morphological integration in the appendicular skeleton of two domestic taxa: the horse and donkey.

Authors:  Pauline Hanot; Anthony Herrel; Claude Guintard; Raphaël Cornette
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Morphological integration in the forelimb of musteloid carnivorans.

Authors:  Anne-Claire Fabre; Anjali Goswami; Stéphane Peigné; Raphaël Cornette
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the pectoral girdle during upside-down locomotion of two-toed sloths (Choloepus didactylus, Linné 1758).

Authors:  John A Nyakatura; Martin S Fischer
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  A first glimpse at the influence of body mass in the morphological integration of the limb long bones: an investigation in modern rhinoceroses.

Authors:  Christophe Mallet; Guillaume Billet; Alexandra Houssaye; Raphaël Cornette
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.921

10.  Scale effects and morphological diversification in hindlimb segment mass proportions in neognath birds.

Authors:  Brandon M Kilbourne
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.