Literature DB >> 19087180

Drift promotes speciation by sexual selection.

Josef C Uyeda1, Stevan J Arnold, Paul A Hohenlohe, Louise S Mead.   

Abstract

Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection have generally failed to provide a direct connection to speciation and to explore the consequences of finite population size. The connection to speciation has been indirect because the models have treated only the evolution of male and female traits and have stopped short of modeling the evolution of sexual isolation. In this article we extend Lande's (1981) model of sexual selection to quantify predictions about the evolution of sexual isolation and speciation. Our results, based on computer simulations, support and extend Lande's claim that drift along a line of equilibria can rapidly lead to sexual isolation and speciation. Furthermore, we show that rapid speciation can occur by drift in populations of appreciable size (N(e) >or= 1000). These results are in sharp contrast to the opinion of many researchers and textbook writers who have argued that drift does not play an important role in speciation. We argue that drift may be a powerful amplifier of speciation under a wide variety of modeling assumptions, even when selection acts directly on female mating preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19087180      PMCID: PMC3558038          DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00589.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  15 in total

1.  The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.

Authors:  S Gavrilets; G Arnqvist; U Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution.

Authors:  Y Iwasa; A Pomiankowski
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict.

Authors:  S Gavrilets
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Evolution of the genetic covariance between male and female components of mate recognition: an experimental test.

Authors:  M W Blows
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Resolving the paradox of stasis: models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary divergence on all timescales.

Authors:  Suzanne Estes; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Analysis of data on sexual isolation.

Authors:  A J BATEMAN
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1949-06       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Correspondence between sexual isolation and allozyme differentiation: a test in the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus.

Authors:  S G Tilley; P A Verrell; S J Arnold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits.

Authors:  D Schluter; T Price
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1993-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Role of sexual selection in speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Akanksha Singh; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Dispersal and local persistence shape the genetic structure of a widespread Neotropical plant species with a patchy distribution.

Authors:  Bárbara Simões Santos Leal; Vanessa Araujo Graciano; Cleber Juliano Neves Chaves; Luis Alberto Pillaca Huacre; Myriam Heuertz; Clarisse Palma-Silva
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Dimensionality of mate choice, sexual isolation, and speciation.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Correlation between acoustic divergence and phylogenetic distance in soniferous European gobiids (Gobiidae; Gobius lineage).

Authors:  Sven Horvatić; Stefano Malavasi; Jasna Vukić; Radek Šanda; Zoran Marčić; Marko Ćaleta; Massimo Lorenzoni; Perica Mustafić; Ivana Buj; Lucija Onorato; Lucija Ivić; Francesco Cavraro; Davor Zanella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Reinforcement of gametic isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Island biology and morphological divergence of the Skyros wall lizard Podarcis gaigeae: a combined role for local selection and genetic drift on color morph frequency divergence?

Authors:  Anna Runemark; Bengt Hansson; Panayiotis Pafilis; Efstratios D Valakos; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Genetic drift does not sufficiently explain patterns of electric signal variation among populations of the mormyrid electric fish Paramormyrops kingsleyae.

Authors:  Sophie Picq; Joshua Sperling; Catherine J Cheng; Bruce A Carlson; Jason R Gallant
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Key ornamental innovations facilitate diversification in an avian radiation.

Authors:  Rafael Maia; Dustin R Rubenstein; Matthew D Shawkey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The genetic basis of female mate preference and species isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Meghan Laturney; Amanda J Moehring
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-08-23

10.  The role of ecological variation in driving divergence of sexual and non-sexual traits in the red-backed fairy-wren (Malurus melanocephalus).

Authors:  Daniel T Baldassarre; Henri A Thomassen; Jordan Karubian; Michael S Webster
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.