Literature DB >> 19087107

The tragedy of the reviewer commons.

Michael E Hochberg, Jonathan M Chase, Nicholas J Gotelli, Alan Hastings, Shahid Naeem.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19087107     DOI： 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01276.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN： 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Niche-driven evolution of metabolic and life-history strategies in natural and domesticated populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Aymé Spor; Thibault Nidelet; Jonattan Simon; Aurélie Bourgais; Dominique de Vienne; Delphine Sicard
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 2.  Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors.

Authors:  Armen Yuri Gasparyan; Lilit Ayvazyan; Heather Blackmore; George D Kitas
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers.

Authors:  Maurício Cantor; Shane Gero
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Imbalance in individual researcher's peer review activities quantified for four British Ecological Society journals, 2003-2010.

Authors:  Owen L Petchey; Jeremy W Fox; Lindsay Haddon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Editorial behaviors in peer review.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Xiangjie Kong; Jun Zhang; Zhen Chen; Feng Xia; Xianwen Wang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-27

6.  Principles of cooperation across systems: from human sharing to multicellularity and cancer.

Authors:  Athena Aktipis
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  The case for open preprints in biology.

Authors:  Philippe Desjardins-Proulx; Ethan P White; Joel J Adamson; Karthik Ram; Timothée Poisot; Dominique Gravel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals.

Authors:  Vivian M Nguyen; Neal R Haddaway; Lee F G Gutowsky; Alexander D M Wilson; Austin J Gallagher; Michael R Donaldson; Neil Hammerschlag; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Charles W Fox; Arianne Y K Albert; Timothy H Vines
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2017-03-08

10.  The effectiveness of journals as arbiters of scientific impact.

Authors:  C E Timothy Paine; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.912
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.