Literature DB >> 19087046

Robotic technology in surgery: current status in 2008.

Declan G Murphy1, Rohan Hall, Raymond Tong, Rajiv Goel, Anthony J Costello.   

Abstract

There is increasing patient and surgeon interest in robotic-assisted surgery, particularly with the proliferation of da Vinci surgical systems (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) throughout the world. There is much debate over the usefulness and cost-effectiveness of these systems. The currently available robotic surgical technology is described. Published data relating to the da Vinci system are reviewed and the current status of surgical robotics within Australia and New Zealand is assessed. The first da Vinci system in Australia and New Zealand was installed in 2003. Four systems had been installed by 2006 and seven systems are currently in use. Most of these are based in private hospitals. Technical advantages of this system include 3-D vision, enhanced dexterity and improved ergonomics when compared with standard laparoscopic surgery. Most procedures currently carried out are urological, with cardiac, gynaecological and general surgeons also using this system. The number of patients undergoing robotic-assisted surgery in Australia and New Zealand has increased fivefold in the past 4 years. The most common procedure carried out is robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Published data suggest that robotic-assisted surgery is feasible and safe although the installation and recurring costs remain high. There is increasing acceptance of robotic-assisted surgery, especially for urological procedures. The da Vinci surgical system is becoming more widely available in Australia and New Zealand. Other surgical specialties will probably use this technology. Significant costs are associated with robotic technology and it is not yet widely available to public patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19087046     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04754.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  6 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted surgery:--impact on gynaecological and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  O E O'Sullivan; B A O'Reilly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Benjamin J Challacombe; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Robotic learning of motion using demonstrations and statistical models for surgical simulation.

Authors:  Tao Yang; Chee Kong Chui; Jiang Liu; Weimin Huang; Yi Su; Stephen K Y Chang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for recurrent diverticulitis: experience in consecutive cases and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Madhu Ragupathi; Diego I Ramos-Valadez; Chirag B Patel; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Minimally invasive evaluation and treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Anton L Gueorguiev; Richard Mackey; Gopal C Kowdley; Jesus Esquivel; Steven C Cunningham
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-07

6.  Knowledge and attitudes of theatre staff prior to the implementation of robotic-assisted surgery in the public sector.

Authors:  Kate E McBride; Daniel Steffens; Kylie Duncan; Paul G Bannon; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.