BACKGROUND: Risk factors and treatment outcomes under program conditions for isoniazid (INH)-monoresistant tuberculosis have not been well described. METHODS: Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed for all cases of culture-confirmed, INH-monoresistant tuberculosis ( n = 137) reported to the San Francisco Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Section from October 1992 through October 2005, and those cases were compared with a time-matched sample of drug-susceptible tuberculosis cases (n = 274) RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, only a history of treatment for latent tuberculosis (odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-6.4; P = .003) or for active tuberculosis (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.0; P = .002) were significantly associated with INH-monoresistant tuberculosis. Of the 119 patients who completed treatment, 49 (41%) completed a 6-month treatment regimen. Treatment was extended to 7-12 months for 53 (45%) of the patients and to >12 months for 17 (14%). Treatment was most commonly extended because pyrazinamide was not given for the recommended 6-month duration (35 patients [29%]). Despite variation in treatment regimens, the combined end point of treatment failure or relapse was uncommon among patients with INH-monoresistant tuberculosis and was not significantly different for patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis (1.7% vs. 2.2%; P = .73). CONCLUSIONS: A history of treatment for latent or active tuberculosis was associated with subsequent INH monoresistance. Treatment outcomes for patients with INH-monoresistant tuberculosis were excellent and were no different from those for patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis. However, new, short-course regimens are needed because a small proportion of patients completed the 6-month treatment regimen recommended by the American Thoracic Society, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Infectious Diseases Society of America, primarily because of pyrazinamide intolerance.
BACKGROUND: Risk factors and treatment outcomes under program conditions for isoniazid (INH)-monoresistant tuberculosis have not been well described. METHODS: Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed for all cases of culture-confirmed, INH-monoresistant tuberculosis ( n = 137) reported to the San Francisco Department of Public Health Tuberculosis Control Section from October 1992 through October 2005, and those cases were compared with a time-matched sample of drug-susceptible tuberculosis cases (n = 274) RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, only a history of treatment for latent tuberculosis (odds ratio [OR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-6.4; P = .003) or for active tuberculosis (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.0; P = .002) were significantly associated with INH-monoresistant tuberculosis. Of the 119 patients who completed treatment, 49 (41%) completed a 6-month treatment regimen. Treatment was extended to 7-12 months for 53 (45%) of the patients and to >12 months for 17 (14%). Treatment was most commonly extended because pyrazinamide was not given for the recommended 6-month duration (35 patients [29%]). Despite variation in treatment regimens, the combined end point of treatment failure or relapse was uncommon among patients with INH-monoresistant tuberculosis and was not significantly different for patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis (1.7% vs. 2.2%; P = .73). CONCLUSIONS: A history of treatment for latent or active tuberculosis was associated with subsequent INH monoresistance. Treatment outcomes for patients with INH-monoresistant tuberculosis were excellent and were no different from those for patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis. However, new, short-course regimens are needed because a small proportion of patients completed the 6-month treatment regimen recommended by the American Thoracic Society, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Infectious Diseases Society of America, primarily because of pyrazinamide intolerance.
Authors: Henry M Blumberg; William J Burman; Richard E Chaisson; Charles L Daley; Sue C Etkind; Lloyd N Friedman; Paula Fujiwara; Malgosia Grzemska; Philip C Hopewell; Michael D Iseman; Robert M Jasmer; Venkatarama Koppaka; Richard I Menzies; Richard J O'Brien; Randall R Reves; Lee B Reichman; Patricia M Simone; Jeffrey R Starke; Andrew A Vernon Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Robert M Jasmer; Jussi J Saukkonen; Henry M Blumberg; Charles L Daley; John Bernardo; Eric Vittinghoff; Mark D King; L Masae Kawamura; Philip C Hopewell Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Marcos Burgos; Kathryn DeRiemer; Peter M Small; Philip C Hopewell; Charles L Daley Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2003-12-09 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Karen R Jacobson; Danie Theron; Thomas C Victor; Elizabeth M Streicher; Robin M Warren; Megan B Murray Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Argita D Salindri; Rose-Marie F Sales; Lauren DiMiceli; Marcos C Schechter; Russell R Kempker; Matthew J Magee Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2018-03
Authors: Anne F Luetkemeyer; Michelle A Kendall; Xingye Wu; Maria Cristina Lourenço; Ute Jentsch; Susan Swindells; Sarojini S Qasba; Jorge Sanchez; Diane V Havlir; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Ian M Sanne; Cynthia Firnhaber Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Fedora Lanzas; Thomas R Ioerger; Harita Shah; William Acosta; Petros C Karakousis Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 5.948