Literature DB >> 19083824

On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers.

Thore Egeland1, Nuala Sheehan.   

Abstract

This paper considers identification problems based on DNA marker data. The topics we discuss are general, but we will exemplify them in a simple context. There is DNA available from two persons. There is uncertainty about the relationship between the two individuals and a number of hypotheses describing the possible relationship is available. The task is to determine the most likely pedigree. This problem is fairly standard. However, there are some problems that cannot be solved using DNA from independently segregating loci. For example, the likelihoods for (i) grandparent-grandchild, (ii) uncle-niece and (iii) half-sibs coincide for such DNA data and so these relations cannot be distinguished on the basis of markers normally used for forensic identification problems: the likelihood ratio comparing any pair of hypotheses will be unity. Sometimes, but not in the examples we consider, other sources of DNA like mtDNA or sex chromosomes can help to distinguish between such equally likely possibilities. Prior information can likewise be of use. For instance, age information can exclude alternative (i) above and also indicate that alternative (iii) is apriori more likely than alternative (ii). More generally, the above problems can be solved using linked autosomal markers. To study the problem in detail and understand how linkage works in this regard, we derive an explicit formula for a pair of linked markers. The formula extends to independent pairs of linked markers. While this approach adds to the understanding of the problem, more markers are required to obtain satisfactory results and then the Lander-Green algorithm is needed. Simulation experiments are presented based on a range of scenarios and we conclude that useful results can be obtained using available freeware (MERLIN and R). The main message of this paper is that linked autosomal markers deserve greater attention in forensic genetics and that the required laboratory and statistical analyses can be performed based on existing technology and freeware.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19083824     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  6 in total

1.  Population data of 21 non-CODIS STR loci in Han population of northern China.

Authors:  Li Yuan; Jianye Ge; Di Lu; Xue Yang
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Mixtures with relatives and linked markers.

Authors:  Guro Dørum; Daniel Kling; Andreas Tillmar; Magnus Dehli Vigeland; Thore Egeland
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  A general model for likelihood computations of genetic marker data accounting for linkage, linkage disequilibrium, and mutations.

Authors:  Daniel Kling; Andreas Tillmar; Thore Egeland; Petter Mostad
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Population data of 13 nonCODIS STR markers located inside the 6 nonsyndromic oculocutaneous albinism genes.

Authors:  Faravareh Khordadpoor Deilamani; Mohammad Taghi Akbari
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Population-scale whole genome sequencing identifies 271 highly polymorphic short tandem repeats from Japanese population.

Authors:  Satoshi Hirata; Kaname Kojima; Kazuharu Misawa; Olivier Gervais; Yosuke Kawai; Masao Nagasaki
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-05-22

6.  Using object oriented bayesian networks to model linkage, linkage disequilibrium and mutations between STR markers.

Authors:  Daniel Kling; Thore Egeland; Petter Mostad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.